You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by ajs6f <aj...@apache.org> on 2018/06/28 16:53:05 UTC
Old internal notes?
Hey, Jena-folks,
I found this page: https://jena.apache.org/documentation/notes/jena-internals.html
while looking for something else, and after reading it, I wonder if it's a good thing to keep in the public documentation. It seems more than a bit out-of-date, since it refers to types that don't exist and plans that don't seemed to have been carried out.
Am I missing something, or shall I move that page to the Cwiki instance as historical-only?
ajs6f
Re: Old internal notes?
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 29/06/18 21:51, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Good idea.
>
> Andy
>
> (A quick step ASAP would be to unlink from notes/index and make the note
> at the top of the page much, much more obvious.)
This part is done.
http://jena.staging.apache.org/documentation/notes/jena-internals.html
>
>
> On 28/06/18 17:53, ajs6f wrote:
>> Hey, Jena-folks,
>>
>> I found this page:
>> https://jena.apache.org/documentation/notes/jena-internals.html
>>
>> while looking for something else, and after reading it, I wonder if
>> it's a good thing to keep in the public documentation. It seems more
>> than a bit out-of-date, since it refers to types that don't exist and
>> plans that don't seemed to have been carried out.
>>
>> Am I missing something, or shall I move that page to the Cwiki
>> instance as historical-only?
>>
>> ajs6f
>>
Re: Old internal notes?
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
Good idea.
Andy
(A quick step ASAP would be to unlink from notes/index and make the note
at the top of the page much, much more obvious.)
On 28/06/18 17:53, ajs6f wrote:
> Hey, Jena-folks,
>
> I found this page: https://jena.apache.org/documentation/notes/jena-internals.html
>
> while looking for something else, and after reading it, I wonder if it's a good thing to keep in the public documentation. It seems more than a bit out-of-date, since it refers to types that don't exist and plans that don't seemed to have been carried out.
>
> Am I missing something, or shall I move that page to the Cwiki instance as historical-only?
>
> ajs6f
>