You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tapestry.apache.org by Norbert Sándor <pr...@hotmail.com> on 2004/06/29 21:46:32 UTC
3.1
The 3.1 release seems very promising. Is there a roadmap for that release?
Thanks in advance,
Norbi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Preferred project layout [auf Viren geprueft]
Posted by Geoff Longman <gl...@intelligentworks.com>.
Spindle places new pages component in the folder that contains the .application file (or .library file if that's what you are adding the page/component too). Its the simplest choice right now as Spindle does not yet have the capability to update .application/.library files with <page> or <component> tags. Well, it could easily do this by rewriting the file (older versions of Spindle did this) but I'm staying away from that approach. Working towards an update mechanism that preserves the tags in the order a user has added them (and preserves your comments!).
The rules Tapestry uses to locate things are quite complex (maybe too complex?) The best reference for these rules is the Tapestry javadocs themselves.
Pages (class comment):
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/doc/api/org/apache/tapestry/resolver/PageSpecificationResolver.html
Components (class comment):
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/doc/api/org/apache/tapestry/resolver/ComponentSpecificationResolver.html
Template lookup is done by a private method so its javadoc is not publicly available (outside of examining the source of course) Here is the javadoc for DefaultTemplateSource#findTemplate()
/**
* Finds the template for the given component, using the following rules:
* <ul>
* <li>If the component has a $template asset, use that
* <li>Look for a template in the same folder as the component
* <li>If a page in the application namespace, search in the application root
* <li>Fail!
* </ul>
*
* @return the template, or null if not found
*
**/
So by the last javadoc, component templates must be located in the same folder as the spec (unless a $template asset is used)
Whew, long and complicated. The short story is that the spindle wizard places things where they will be picked up without requiring a modification to a .application or .library file. The Spindle builder, however, implements and uses all the rules stated above. So, if you have a component that is not being picked up, either its not in a place where it will be picked up by default, or its not defined in a <page> or <component> tag in the application/library, or Spindle is broken.
Would need to know specifics on where your Border component is located to make an opinion on whether Spindle screwed up.
Last thing, normally, the way Tapestry 3.0 works, application pages/components can't sit in the classpath next to the .java files if the application spec is under /context. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong here (I've now gone an confused myself with all of the above). There is a way to place your application in the classpath, see
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/doc/api/org/apache/tapestry/ApplicationServlet.html#getApplicationSpecificationLocation()
and
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/doc/api/org/apache/tapestry/ApplicationServlet.html#getApplicationSpecificationPath()
Geoff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan O'Connor" <Jo...@xcom.de>
To: "Tapestry users" <ta...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: Preferred project layout [auf Viren geprueft]
> Geoff,
> So what your saying is just keep all the .page and .jwc files in
> context/WEB-INF and the .html files in context.
> Of course, our build script does exactly that, but during development I
> like to divide up the system into smaller directories.
>
> Let me ask some easier more specific questions:
> 1. Do people keep xxx.java in the same folder as xxx.html and xxx.page, or
> in separate directories?
> 2. Do people keep each component in a separate directory?
>
> My end goal is to have Spindle tell me I have no errors and warnings in my
> Tapestry code. Currently, I have lots of messages telling me "Component
> 'Border' is not in project workspace."
>
> Ciao,
> Jonathan O'Connor
> Development Manager
> XCOM Dublin
> Phone: +353 1 872 3305
> Mobile: +353 86 824 9736
>
>
>
> "Geoff Longman" <gl...@intelligentworks.com>
> 06/07/2004 10:45
> Please respond to
> "Tapestry users" <ta...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
> To
> "Tapestry users" <ta...@jakarta.apache.org>
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: Preferred project layout [auf Viren geprueft]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> You can place things anywhere that <page> or <component> elements (in a
> .application or .library file) can see.
>
> But, you have to maintain those files by hand.
>
> Geoff
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jonathan O'Connor" <Jo...@xcom.de>
> To: "Tapestry users" <ta...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 1:45 PM
> Subject: Preferred project layout [auf Viren geprueft]
>
>
> > Guys,
> > I'm looking for the best directory structure for our Tapestry project.
> We
> > use the Spindle plugin, and I'd like to be fully compatible with that.
> > At the moment we have a context folder containing WEB-INF and all the
> > *.page and *.html. I can live with this for all our main pages.
> > We also have a few components that each have their own directories
> > containing .java, .html and .jwc files. However, Spindle doesn't like
> > these omponents because they don't live in /context.
> >
> > Appendix B of The Book is too simplistic, and doesn't say anything about
>
> > components.
> >
> > Any ideas are gratefully received.
> > Ciao,
> > Jonathan O'Connor
> > Development Manager
> > XCOM Dublin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Preferred project layout [auf Viren geprueft]
Posted by Jonathan O'Connor <Jo...@xcom.de>.
Geoff,
So what your saying is just keep all the .page and .jwc files in
context/WEB-INF and the .html files in context.
Of course, our build script does exactly that, but during development I
like to divide up the system into smaller directories.
Let me ask some easier more specific questions:
1. Do people keep xxx.java in the same folder as xxx.html and xxx.page, or
in separate directories?
2. Do people keep each component in a separate directory?
My end goal is to have Spindle tell me I have no errors and warnings in my
Tapestry code. Currently, I have lots of messages telling me "Component
'Border' is not in project workspace."
Ciao,
Jonathan O'Connor
Development Manager
XCOM Dublin
Phone: +353 1 872 3305
Mobile: +353 86 824 9736
"Geoff Longman" <gl...@intelligentworks.com>
06/07/2004 10:45
Please respond to
"Tapestry users" <ta...@jakarta.apache.org>
To
"Tapestry users" <ta...@jakarta.apache.org>
cc
Subject
Re: Preferred project layout [auf Viren geprueft]
You can place things anywhere that <page> or <component> elements (in a
.application or .library file) can see.
But, you have to maintain those files by hand.
Geoff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan O'Connor" <Jo...@xcom.de>
To: "Tapestry users" <ta...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 1:45 PM
Subject: Preferred project layout [auf Viren geprueft]
> Guys,
> I'm looking for the best directory structure for our Tapestry project.
We
> use the Spindle plugin, and I'd like to be fully compatible with that.
> At the moment we have a context folder containing WEB-INF and all the
> *.page and *.html. I can live with this for all our main pages.
> We also have a few components that each have their own directories
> containing .java, .html and .jwc files. However, Spindle doesn't like
> these omponents because they don't live in /context.
>
> Appendix B of The Book is too simplistic, and doesn't say anything about
> components.
>
> Any ideas are gratefully received.
> Ciao,
> Jonathan O'Connor
> Development Manager
> XCOM Dublin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Preferred project layout [auf Viren geprueft]
Posted by Geoff Longman <gl...@intelligentworks.com>.
You can place things anywhere that <page> or <component> elements (in a .application or .library file) can see.
But, you have to maintain those files by hand.
Geoff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan O'Connor" <Jo...@xcom.de>
To: "Tapestry users" <ta...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 1:45 PM
Subject: Preferred project layout [auf Viren geprueft]
> Guys,
> I'm looking for the best directory structure for our Tapestry project. We
> use the Spindle plugin, and I'd like to be fully compatible with that.
> At the moment we have a context folder containing WEB-INF and all the
> *.page and *.html. I can live with this for all our main pages.
> We also have a few components that each have their own directories
> containing .java, .html and .jwc files. However, Spindle doesn't like
> these omponents because they don't live in /context.
>
> Appendix B of The Book is too simplistic, and doesn't say anything about
> components.
>
> Any ideas are gratefully received.
> Ciao,
> Jonathan O'Connor
> Development Manager
> XCOM Dublin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Preferred project layout [auf Viren geprueft]
Posted by Jonathan O'Connor <Jo...@xcom.de>.
Guys,
I'm looking for the best directory structure for our Tapestry project. We
use the Spindle plugin, and I'd like to be fully compatible with that.
At the moment we have a context folder containing WEB-INF and all the
*.page and *.html. I can live with this for all our main pages.
We also have a few components that each have their own directories
containing .java, .html and .jwc files. However, Spindle doesn't like
these omponents because they don't live in /context.
Appendix B of The Book is too simplistic, and doesn't say anything about
components.
Any ideas are gratefully received.
Ciao,
Jonathan O'Connor
Development Manager
XCOM Dublin
Re: 3.1
Posted by Howard Lewis Ship <hl...@gmail.com>.
"Tapestry Director's Cut"
"Tapestry The Special Edition"
"Mystery Science Tapestry 3000"
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 15:42:06 +0800, Rosdi Kasim <ro...@onepixel.com.my> wrote:
>
> No!.. i think Tapestry XP or Tapestry 2005 sounds MUCH better! :D
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marcus Brito" <mb...@gmail.com>
> To: "Tapestry users" <ta...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 12:11 AM
> Subject: Re: 3.1
>
> > How about Tapestry 3, version 5.0? :-)
> >
> > On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 11:26:25 -0400, Howard Lewis Ship <hl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > Or 2.5? Or perhaps 6.6.6? Version numbers are mostly about marketing.
> > > Functionality changes between 3.0 and 3.1 will justify a small bump in
> > > the version number, even if what's iunder the covers changes a lot.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
http://howardlewisship.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: 3.1
Posted by Warner Onstine <sw...@warneronstine.com>.
How about "Tapestry Reloaded" and then "Tapestry Revolutions". (Sorry
had to throw out the Matrix references).
-warner
On Jul 7, 2004, at 12:42 AM, Rosdi Kasim wrote:
>
> No!.. i think Tapestry XP or Tapestry 2005 sounds MUCH better! :D
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marcus Brito" <mb...@gmail.com>
> To: "Tapestry users" <ta...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 12:11 AM
> Subject: Re: 3.1
>
>
>> How about Tapestry 3, version 5.0? :-)
>>
>> On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 11:26:25 -0400, Howard Lewis Ship
>> <hl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>> Or 2.5? Or perhaps 6.6.6? Version numbers are mostly about
>>> marketing.
>>> Functionality changes between 3.0 and 3.1 will justify a small bump
>>> in
>>> the version number, even if what's iunder the covers changes a lot.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: 3.1
Posted by Rosdi Kasim <ro...@onepixel.com.my>.
No!.. i think Tapestry XP or Tapestry 2005 sounds MUCH better! :D
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marcus Brito" <mb...@gmail.com>
To: "Tapestry users" <ta...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 12:11 AM
Subject: Re: 3.1
> How about Tapestry 3, version 5.0? :-)
>
> On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 11:26:25 -0400, Howard Lewis Ship <hl...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > Or 2.5? Or perhaps 6.6.6? Version numbers are mostly about marketing.
> > Functionality changes between 3.0 and 3.1 will justify a small bump in
> > the version number, even if what's iunder the covers changes a lot.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: 3.1
Posted by Marcus Brito <mb...@gmail.com>.
How about Tapestry 3, version 5.0? :-)
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 11:26:25 -0400, Howard Lewis Ship <hl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Or 2.5? Or perhaps 6.6.6? Version numbers are mostly about marketing.
> Functionality changes between 3.0 and 3.1 will justify a small bump in
> the version number, even if what's iunder the covers changes a lot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: 3.1
Posted by Howard Lewis Ship <hl...@gmail.com>.
Or 2.5? Or perhaps 6.6.6? Version numbers are mostly about marketing.
Functionality changes between 3.0 and 3.1 will justify a small bump in
the version number, even if what's iunder the covers changes a lot.
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:59:45 +0200, Vjeran Marcinko <vj...@tis.hr> wrote:
> Maybe it will be called 4.0 because of major refactorings ? ;-)
>
> -Vjeran
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Howard Lewis Ship" <hl...@gmail.com>
> To: "Tapestry users" <ta...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 2:01 PM
> Subject: Re: 3.1
>
> There's some notes on the Wiki, but no firm dates. It's a pretty major
> refactoring effort that has to be worked around all existing
> committments (my consulting, Eric's book and consulting, etc.). Viva
> open source!
>
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:46:32 +0200, Norbert Sándor
> <pr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > The 3.1 release seems very promising. Is there a roadmap for that release?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Norbi
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> --
> Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
> Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
> Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
> http://howardlewisship.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
http://howardlewisship.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: 3.1
Posted by Vjeran Marcinko <vj...@tis.hr>.
Maybe it will be called 4.0 because of major refactorings ? ;-)
-Vjeran
----- Original Message -----
From: "Howard Lewis Ship" <hl...@gmail.com>
To: "Tapestry users" <ta...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: 3.1
There's some notes on the Wiki, but no firm dates. It's a pretty major
refactoring effort that has to be worked around all existing
committments (my consulting, Eric's book and consulting, etc.). Viva
open source!
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:46:32 +0200, Norbert Sándor
<pr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> The 3.1 release seems very promising. Is there a roadmap for that release?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Norbi
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
http://howardlewisship.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: 3.1
Posted by Howard Lewis Ship <hl...@gmail.com>.
There's some notes on the Wiki, but no firm dates. It's a pretty major
refactoring effort that has to be worked around all existing
committments (my consulting, Eric's book and consulting, etc.). Viva
open source!
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:46:32 +0200, Norbert Sándor
<pr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> The 3.1 release seems very promising. Is there a roadmap for that release?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Norbi
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
http://howardlewisship.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org