You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@pulsar.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/09/15 12:18:13 UTC

[GitHub] [pulsar] 315157973 commented on a change in pull request #12044: [Client] Fix endless receiveAsync loop in MultiTopicsConsumer

315157973 commented on a change in pull request #12044:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12044#discussion_r709126852



##########
File path: pulsar-broker/src/test/java/org/apache/pulsar/client/api/MultiTopicsConsumerTest.java
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.pulsar.client.api;
+
+import static org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers.any;
+import static org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers.anyLong;
+import static org.mockito.Mockito.mock;
+import static org.mockito.Mockito.times;
+import static org.mockito.Mockito.verify;
+import com.google.common.collect.Lists;
+import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
+import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledExecutorService;
+import lombok.Cleanup;
+import org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.ClientBuilderImpl;
+import org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.PulsarClientImpl;
+import org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.conf.ClientConfigurationData;
+import org.mockito.AdditionalAnswers;
+import org.mockito.Mockito;
+import org.slf4j.Logger;
+import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
+import org.testng.annotations.AfterMethod;
+import org.testng.annotations.BeforeMethod;
+import org.testng.annotations.Test;
+
+@Test(groups = "broker")
+public class MultiTopicsConsumerTest extends ProducerConsumerBase {
+    private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(MultiTopicsConsumerTest.class);
+    private ScheduledExecutorService internalExecutorServiceDelegate;
+
+    @BeforeMethod(alwaysRun = true)
+    @Override
+    protected void setup() throws Exception {
+        super.internalSetup();
+        super.producerBaseSetup();
+    }
+
+    @AfterMethod(alwaysRun = true)
+    @Override
+    protected void cleanup() throws Exception {
+        super.internalCleanup();
+    }
+
+    @Override
+    protected PulsarClient createNewPulsarClient(ClientBuilder clientBuilder) throws PulsarClientException {
+        ClientConfigurationData conf =
+                ((ClientBuilderImpl) clientBuilder).getClientConfigurationData();
+        return new PulsarClientImpl(conf) {
+            {
+                ScheduledExecutorService internalExecutorService =
+                        (ScheduledExecutorService) super.getInternalExecutorService();
+                internalExecutorServiceDelegate = mock(ScheduledExecutorService.class,
+                        // a spy isn't used since that doesn't work for private classes, instead
+                        // the mock delegatesTo an existing instance. A delegate is sufficient for verifying
+                        // method calls on the interface.
+                        Mockito.withSettings().defaultAnswer(AdditionalAnswers.delegatesTo(internalExecutorService)));
+            }
+            @Override
+            public ExecutorService getInternalExecutorService() {
+                return internalExecutorServiceDelegate;
+            }
+        };
+    }
+
+    // test that reproduces the issue https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12024
+    // where closing the consumer leads to an endless receive loop
+    @Test
+    public void testMultiTopicsConsumerCloses() throws Exception {
+        String topicNameBase = "persistent://my-property/my-ns/my-topic-consumer-closes-";
+
+        @Cleanup
+        Producer<byte[]> producer1 = pulsarClient.newProducer()
+                .topic(topicNameBase + "1")
+                .enableBatching(false)
+                .create();
+        @Cleanup
+        Producer<byte[]> producer2 = pulsarClient.newProducer()
+                .topic(topicNameBase + "2")
+                .enableBatching(false)
+                .create();
+        @Cleanup
+        Producer<byte[]> producer3 = pulsarClient.newProducer()
+                .topic(topicNameBase + "3")
+                .enableBatching(false)
+                .create();
+
+        Consumer<byte[]> consumer = pulsarClient
+                .newConsumer()
+                .topics(Lists.newArrayList(topicNameBase + "1", topicNameBase + "2", topicNameBase + "3"))
+                .subscriptionInitialPosition(SubscriptionInitialPosition.Earliest)
+                .receiverQueueSize(1)
+                .subscriptionName(methodName)
+                .subscribe();
+
+        // wait for background tasks to start
+        Thread.sleep(1000L);

Review comment:
       We cannot be sure that this task can be started within 1 second.
   I think we should use `awaitility`




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@pulsar.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org