You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Jeanne Waldman <je...@oracle.com> on 2007/11/15 18:48:16 UTC
1.2.4-branch is ready...
My vote is still to make 1.2 the trunk, and not have two trunks.
By the way, I created 1.2.4-branch, and did the merge and did a quick
test by following Adam's directions on the wiki page. Matthias, what is
the next step in the process?
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/TrinidadCreating12Branches
Thanks,
Jeanne
Andrew Robinson wrote:
> +1
>
> Getting the ball rolling :)
>
> On 11/15/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Vote:
>> Creation of https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/
>>
>> Justification:
>> Once again trinidad lacking a trunk for 1.2 is giving me heartburn.
>> I have been making changes to 1.0.5 and to be nice, I wanted to put
>> them into 1.2 as well, but of course there is no home for 1.2.5 yet.
>> Unlike the last time this was brought up, we now have an existing
>> example as an argument to use as a standard:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk_1.2.x/
>>
>> If it is good enough for core, should it not also be good enough for trinidad?
>>
>> Since "https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/" would
>> remain untouched, this should remove any debates over JSF not being
>> supported.
>>
>> Benefits:
>> 1) 1.2 snapshots possible with continuum
>> 2) 1.2 is kept up to date
>> 3) easier merge during 1.2 release time and hopefully as a result a
>> more stable product
>>
>> -Andrew
>>
>
Re: [TRINIDAD] 1.2.4-branch is ready...
Posted by Jeanne Waldman <je...@oracle.com>.
putting Trinidad in the subject because I forgot to originally.
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> next is "testing" and prepare a release candidate.
>
> by end of next week (if all agree) I can provide a 124 RC
> so, we have some time to test. If we need more time, no
> big deal in waiting some more days :-)
>
> -M
>
> On Nov 15, 2007 12:48 PM, Jeanne Waldman <je...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> My vote is still to make 1.2 the trunk, and not have two trunks.
>> By the way, I created 1.2.4-branch, and did the merge and did a quick
>> test by following Adam's directions on the wiki page. Matthias, what is
>> the next step in the process?
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/TrinidadCreating12Branches
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jeanne
>>
>> Andrew Robinson wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Getting the ball rolling :)
>>>
>>> On 11/15/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Vote:
>>>> Creation of https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/
>>>>
>>>> Justification:
>>>> Once again trinidad lacking a trunk for 1.2 is giving me heartburn.
>>>> I have been making changes to 1.0.5 and to be nice, I wanted to put
>>>> them into 1.2 as well, but of course there is no home for 1.2.5 yet.
>>>> Unlike the last time this was brought up, we now have an existing
>>>> example as an argument to use as a standard:
>>>>
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk_1.2.x/
>>>>
>>>> If it is good enough for core, should it not also be good enough for trinidad?
>>>>
>>>> Since "https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/" would
>>>> remain untouched, this should remove any debates over JSF not being
>>>> supported.
>>>>
>>>> Benefits:
>>>> 1) 1.2 snapshots possible with continuum
>>>> 2) 1.2 is kept up to date
>>>> 3) easier merge during 1.2 release time and hopefully as a result a
>>>> more stable product
>>>>
>>>> -Andrew
>>>>
>
>
>
Re: 1.2.4-branch is ready...
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
next is "testing" and prepare a release candidate.
by end of next week (if all agree) I can provide a 124 RC
so, we have some time to test. If we need more time, no
big deal in waiting some more days :-)
-M
On Nov 15, 2007 12:48 PM, Jeanne Waldman <je...@oracle.com> wrote:
> My vote is still to make 1.2 the trunk, and not have two trunks.
> By the way, I created 1.2.4-branch, and did the merge and did a quick
> test by following Adam's directions on the wiki page. Matthias, what is
> the next step in the process?
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/TrinidadCreating12Branches
>
> Thanks,
> Jeanne
>
> Andrew Robinson wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Getting the ball rolling :)
> >
> > On 11/15/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Vote:
> >> Creation of https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/
> >>
> >> Justification:
> >> Once again trinidad lacking a trunk for 1.2 is giving me heartburn.
> >> I have been making changes to 1.0.5 and to be nice, I wanted to put
> >> them into 1.2 as well, but of course there is no home for 1.2.5 yet.
> >> Unlike the last time this was brought up, we now have an existing
> >> example as an argument to use as a standard:
> >>
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk_1.2.x/
> >>
> >> If it is good enough for core, should it not also be good enough for trinidad?
> >>
> >> Since "https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/" would
> >> remain untouched, this should remove any debates over JSF not being
> >> supported.
> >>
> >> Benefits:
> >> 1) 1.2 snapshots possible with continuum
> >> 2) 1.2 is kept up to date
> >> 3) easier merge during 1.2 release time and hopefully as a result a
> >> more stable product
> >>
> >> -Andrew
> >>
> >
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org