You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@rocketmq.apache.org by jo...@apache.org on 2017/01/01 16:08:36 UTC
Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 January 2017, 10:30 am PDT.
The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
submission (Wed, January 04).
Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
meeting.
Thanks,
The Apache Incubator PMC
Submitting your Report
----------------------
Your report should contain the following:
* Your project name
* A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
the project or necessarily of its field
* A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
towards graduation.
* Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
aware of
* How has the community developed since the last report
* How has the project developed since the last report.
This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017
Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
this page is created from a template.
Mentors
-------
Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
for the Incubator PMC.
Incubator PMC
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> 2) I don't believe that all mentors are required to sign off on the podling report, but I'm not exactly sure.
Mentor sign off is mostly in the low numbers particularly at this time of year. I wouldn’t be too concerned if you don’t get all the mentors signing off. 2 or 3 is a good number.
> 3) I think the shepherds are folks from the IPMC and their reviews are due to Sun, 8 January.
Shepherds check that the mentors are doing their jobs. RocketMQ was not assigned one this month.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
1) The folks on the original proposal are the first PMC members and the PMC
decides as a group who should become a committer via a discussion and a
vote on the private mailing list. The same is true for adding PMC members.
2) I don't believe that all mentors are required to sign off on the podling
report, but I'm not exactly sure. At any rate, mentors need to sign off by
Tue, 10 January.
3) I think the shepherds are folks from the IPMC and their reviews are due
to Sun, 8 January. The mentors are all the folks in the list above the
notes. The section in the report that you highlighted is for notes only.
The top of the report indicates the due dates for various events. I will be
attending the board meeting on Wed, 18 January so I will be present to
answer questions.
Bruce
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 5:11 AM, Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Mentors,
>
> From the latest report[1], I have three questions, looking forward to
> your guys reply :-)
>
> 1. FYO, when do we start the PPMC members election, better ok ?
> 2. Why did only mentor bruce sign off in the podling process, will it
> affect our graduation this year ?
> 3. Who is our shepherd mentor ?
>
>
>
>
> [1]https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017
>
>
>
> 在 2017年1月5日，14:20，Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> Nice job on the website, it's looking good!
>
> Bruce
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:20 PM, yukon <yu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> At present, RocketMQ adopt the RTC model for pull requests, a acceptable PR
> should satisfy two conditions:
>
> 1. Follow the uniform code style[1].
> 2. Reviewed by at least three committers.
>
> [2] is a example pull request, how to deal with PR please refer to [3].
>
> [1]. http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/docs/code-guidelines/
> [2]. https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/5
> [3]. http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/docs/pull-request/
>
> As you can see, the RocketMQ website is online, welcome for any advice.
>
> Regards,
> yukon
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Von,
>
> I am unable to locate either of those usernames in the ASF Confluence
>
> wiki,
>
> so I'm guessing they have not registered for Confluence accounts using
> these usernames. Please let them know that they must register for a
> Confluence username separately from your ASF username here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Signup!default.jspa
>
> Bruce
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>
>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> vintagewang and lollipop are real confluence name. At the same time,
>
> they
>
> are ASF usernames ;-)
>
>
> 在 2017年1月3日，23:23，Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> Hi Von,
>
> I need the Confluence usernames for the guys, not the ASF usernames.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>
>
> wrote:
>
>
> I have contributed some points for our first podling report :-)
>
>
> A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
>
> towards
>
> graduation
> Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
>
> aware
>
> of
>
>
> I am not sure whether we are applicable to answer these problems.
>
> So,
>
> just
>
> let them blank :-)
>
>
> BTW, we found the following committer guys have not been granted for
>
> wiki.
>
> @Bruce, could you help us :-)
>
> wiki name list:
>
> vintagewang
> lollipop
>
>
> 在 2017年1月3日，03:02，Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> I have updated the January podling report on the following wiki
>
> page:
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROCKETMQ/
>
> Podling+Report+January+2017
>
>
> Please contribute anything the wiki page that you feel should be
>
> included
>
> in the final podling report as I plan to post the report to the
>
> IPMC
>
> tomorrow.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:08 AM, <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Dear podling,
>
> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of
>
> time
>
> to
>
> prepare your quarterly board report.
>
> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 January 2017, 10:30 am
>
> PDT.
>
> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2
>
> weeks
>
> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> submission (Wed, January 04).
>
> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the
>
> Incubator
>
> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again,
>
> the
>
> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the
>
> board
>
> meeting.
>
> Thanks,
>
> The Apache Incubator PMC
>
> Submitting your Report
>
> ----------------------
>
> Your report should contain the following:
>
> * Your project name
> * A brief description of your project, which assumes no
>
> knowledge
>
> of
>
> the project or necessarily of its field
> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the
>
> move
>
> towards graduation.
> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need
>
> to
>
> be
>
> aware of
> * How has the community developed since the last report
> * How has the project developed since the last report.
>
> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017
>
> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little
>
> before
>
> this page is created from a template.
>
> Mentors
> -------
>
> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them
>
> off
>
> on
>
> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise
>
> alarms
>
> for the Incubator PMC.
>
> Incubator PMC
>
>
>
>
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\
>
> "YC;VT*"
>
> );'
>
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
>
> );'
>
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>
>
>
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>.
Hi Mentors,
From the latest report[1], I have three questions, looking forward to your guys reply :-)
1. FYO, when do we start the PPMC members election, better ok ?
2. Why did only mentor bruce sign off in the podling process, will it affect our graduation this year ?
3. Who is our shepherd mentor ?
[1]https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017 <https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017>
> 在 2017年1月5日，14:20，Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> Nice job on the website, it's looking good!
>
> Bruce
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:20 PM, yukon <yu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> At present, RocketMQ adopt the RTC model for pull requests, a acceptable PR
>> should satisfy two conditions:
>>
>> 1. Follow the uniform code style[1].
>> 2. Reviewed by at least three committers.
>>
>> [2] is a example pull request, how to deal with PR please refer to [3].
>>
>> [1]. http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/docs/code-guidelines/
>> [2]. https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/5
>> [3]. http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/docs/pull-request/
>>
>> As you can see, the RocketMQ website is online, welcome for any advice.
>>
>> Regards,
>> yukon
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Von,
>>>
>>> I am unable to locate either of those usernames in the ASF Confluence
>> wiki,
>>> so I'm guessing they have not registered for Confluence accounts using
>>> these usernames. Please let them know that they must register for a
>>> Confluence username separately from your ASF username here:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Signup!default.jspa
>>>
>>> Bruce
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Bruce,
>>>>
>>>> vintagewang and lollipop are real confluence name. At the same time,
>> they
>>>> are ASF usernames ;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> 在 2017年1月3日，23:23，Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> 写道：
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Von,
>>>>>
>>>>> I need the Confluence usernames for the guys, not the ASF usernames.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bruce
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I have contributed some points for our first podling report :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
>>> towards
>>>>>> graduation
>>>>>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
>>>> aware
>>>>>> of
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not sure whether we are applicable to answer these problems.
>> So,
>>>> just
>>>>>> let them blank :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, we found the following committer guys have not been granted for
>>>> wiki.
>>>>>> @Bruce, could you help us :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wiki name list:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> vintagewang
>>>>>> lollipop
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 在 2017年1月3日，03:02，Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> 写道：
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have updated the January podling report on the following wiki
>> page:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROCKETMQ/
>>>>>> Podling+Report+January+2017
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please contribute anything the wiki page that you feel should be
>>>> included
>>>>>>> in the final podling report as I plan to post the report to the
>> IPMC
>>>>>>> tomorrow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bruce
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:08 AM, <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear podling,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
>>>>>>>> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of
>> time
>>> to
>>>>>>>> prepare your quarterly board report.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 January 2017, 10:30 am
>>> PDT.
>>>>>>>> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
>>>>>>>> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2
>>> weeks
>>>>>>>> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
>>>>>>>> submission (Wed, January 04).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the
>>> Incubator
>>>>>>>> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again,
>> the
>>>>>>>> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the
>>>> board
>>>>>>>> meeting.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Apache Incubator PMC
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Submitting your Report
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your report should contain the following:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * Your project name
>>>>>>>> * A brief description of your project, which assumes no
>> knowledge
>>> of
>>>>>>>> the project or necessarily of its field
>>>>>>>> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the
>> move
>>>>>>>> towards graduation.
>>>>>>>> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need
>>> to
>>>> be
>>>>>>>> aware of
>>>>>>>> * How has the community developed since the last report
>>>>>>>> * How has the project developed since the last report.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little
>>> before
>>>>>>>> this page is created from a template.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mentors
>>>>>>>> -------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them
>> off
>>>> on
>>>>>>>> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
>>>>>>>> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise
>>> alarms
>>>>>>>> for the Incubator PMC.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Incubator PMC
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> perl -e 'print
>>>>>>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\
>> "YC;VT*"
>>>> );'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
>>>>>>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
>>>>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> perl -e 'print
>>>>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
>>> );'
>>>>>
>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
>>>>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
>>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> perl -e 'print
>>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>>>
>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
>>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
Nice job on the website, it's looking good!
Bruce
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:20 PM, yukon <yu...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At present, RocketMQ adopt the RTC model for pull requests, a acceptable PR
> should satisfy two conditions:
>
> 1. Follow the uniform code style[1].
> 2. Reviewed by at least three committers.
>
> [2] is a example pull request, how to deal with PR please refer to [3].
>
> [1]. http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/docs/code-guidelines/
> [2]. https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/5
> [3]. http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/docs/pull-request/
>
> As you can see, the RocketMQ website is online, welcome for any advice.
>
> Regards,
> yukon
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Von,
> >
> > I am unable to locate either of those usernames in the ASF Confluence
> wiki,
> > so I'm guessing they have not registered for Confluence accounts using
> > these usernames. Please let them know that they must register for a
> > Confluence username separately from your ASF username here:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Signup!default.jspa
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Bruce,
> > >
> > > vintagewang and lollipop are real confluence name. At the same time,
> they
> > > are ASF usernames ;-)
> > >
> > >
> > > > 在 2017年1月3日，23:23，Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> 写道：
> > > >
> > > > Hi Von,
> > > >
> > > > I need the Confluence usernames for the guys, not the ASF usernames.
> > > >
> > > > Bruce
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I have contributed some points for our first podling report :-)
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> > towards
> > > >> graduation
> > > >> Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> > > aware
> > > >> of
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> I am not sure whether we are applicable to answer these problems.
> So,
> > > just
> > > >> let them blank :-)
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> BTW, we found the following committer guys have not been granted for
> > > wiki.
> > > >> @Bruce, could you help us :-)
> > > >>
> > > >> wiki name list:
> > > >>
> > > >> vintagewang
> > > >> lollipop
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>> 在 2017年1月3日，03:02，Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> 写道：
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I have updated the January podling report on the following wiki
> page:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROCKETMQ/
> > > >> Podling+Report+January+2017
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Please contribute anything the wiki page that you feel should be
> > > included
> > > >>> in the final podling report as I plan to post the report to the
> IPMC
> > > >>> tomorrow.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Bruce
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:08 AM, <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Dear podling,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> > > >>>> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of
> time
> > to
> > > >>>> prepare your quarterly board report.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 January 2017, 10:30 am
> > PDT.
> > > >>>> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> > > >>>> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2
> > weeks
> > > >>>> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> > > >>>> submission (Wed, January 04).
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the
> > Incubator
> > > >>>> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again,
> the
> > > >>>> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the
> > > board
> > > >>>> meeting.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The Apache Incubator PMC
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Submitting your Report
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> ----------------------
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Your report should contain the following:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> * Your project name
> > > >>>> * A brief description of your project, which assumes no
> knowledge
> > of
> > > >>>> the project or necessarily of its field
> > > >>>> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the
> move
> > > >>>> towards graduation.
> > > >>>> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need
> > to
> > > be
> > > >>>> aware of
> > > >>>> * How has the community developed since the last report
> > > >>>> * How has the project developed since the last report.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little
> > before
> > > >>>> this page is created from a template.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Mentors
> > > >>>> -------
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them
> off
> > > on
> > > >>>> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> > > >>>> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise
> > alarms
> > > >>>> for the Incubator PMC.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Incubator PMC
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --
> > > >>> perl -e 'print
> > > >>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\
> "YC;VT*"
> > > );'
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> > > >>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> > > >>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > perl -e 'print
> > > > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> > );'
> > > >
> > > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> > > > Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> > > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > perl -e 'print
> > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
> >
> > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> > Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> >
>
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by yukon <yu...@apache.org>.
Hi,
At present, RocketMQ adopt the RTC model for pull requests, a acceptable PR
should satisfy two conditions:
1. Follow the uniform code style[1].
2. Reviewed by at least three committers.
[2] is a example pull request, how to deal with PR please refer to [3].
[1]. http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/docs/code-guidelines/
[2]. https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/5
[3]. http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/docs/pull-request/
As you can see, the RocketMQ website is online, welcome for any advice.
Regards,
yukon
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Von,
>
> I am unable to locate either of those usernames in the ASF Confluence wiki,
> so I'm guessing they have not registered for Confluence accounts using
> these usernames. Please let them know that they must register for a
> Confluence username separately from your ASF username here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Signup!default.jspa
>
> Bruce
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Bruce,
> >
> > vintagewang and lollipop are real confluence name. At the same time, they
> > are ASF usernames ;-)
> >
> >
> > > 在 2017年1月3日，23:23，Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> 写道：
> > >
> > > Hi Von,
> > >
> > > I need the Confluence usernames for the guys, not the ASF usernames.
> > >
> > > Bruce
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I have contributed some points for our first podling report :-)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> towards
> > >> graduation
> > >> Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> > aware
> > >> of
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I am not sure whether we are applicable to answer these problems. So,
> > just
> > >> let them blank :-)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> BTW, we found the following committer guys have not been granted for
> > wiki.
> > >> @Bruce, could you help us :-)
> > >>
> > >> wiki name list:
> > >>
> > >> vintagewang
> > >> lollipop
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> 在 2017年1月3日，03:02，Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> 写道：
> > >>>
> > >>> I have updated the January podling report on the following wiki page:
> > >>>
> > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROCKETMQ/
> > >> Podling+Report+January+2017
> > >>>
> > >>> Please contribute anything the wiki page that you feel should be
> > included
> > >>> in the final podling report as I plan to post the report to the IPMC
> > >>> tomorrow.
> > >>>
> > >>> Bruce
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:08 AM, <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Dear podling,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> > >>>> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time
> to
> > >>>> prepare your quarterly board report.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 January 2017, 10:30 am
> PDT.
> > >>>> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> > >>>> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2
> weeks
> > >>>> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> > >>>> submission (Wed, January 04).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the
> Incubator
> > >>>> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> > >>>> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the
> > board
> > >>>> meeting.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The Apache Incubator PMC
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Submitting your Report
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ----------------------
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Your report should contain the following:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> * Your project name
> > >>>> * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge
> of
> > >>>> the project or necessarily of its field
> > >>>> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> > >>>> towards graduation.
> > >>>> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need
> to
> > be
> > >>>> aware of
> > >>>> * How has the community developed since the last report
> > >>>> * How has the project developed since the last report.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little
> before
> > >>>> this page is created from a template.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Mentors
> > >>>> -------
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off
> > on
> > >>>> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> > >>>> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise
> alarms
> > >>>> for the Incubator PMC.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Incubator PMC
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> perl -e 'print
> > >>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> > );'
> > >>>
> > >>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> > >>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> > >>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > perl -e 'print
> > > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
> > >
> > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> > > Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
Von,
I am unable to locate either of those usernames in the ASF Confluence wiki,
so I'm guessing they have not registered for Confluence accounts using
these usernames. Please let them know that they must register for a
Confluence username separately from your ASF username here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Signup!default.jspa
Bruce
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> vintagewang and lollipop are real confluence name. At the same time, they
> are ASF usernames ;-)
>
>
> > 在 2017年1月3日，23:23，Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> 写道：
> >
> > Hi Von,
> >
> > I need the Confluence usernames for the guys, not the ASF usernames.
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I have contributed some points for our first podling report :-)
> >>
> >>
> >> A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards
> >> graduation
> >> Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> aware
> >> of
> >>
> >>
> >> I am not sure whether we are applicable to answer these problems. So,
> just
> >> let them blank :-)
> >>
> >>
> >> BTW, we found the following committer guys have not been granted for
> wiki.
> >> @Bruce, could you help us :-)
> >>
> >> wiki name list:
> >>
> >> vintagewang
> >> lollipop
> >>
> >>
> >>> 在 2017年1月3日，03:02，Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> 写道：
> >>>
> >>> I have updated the January podling report on the following wiki page:
> >>>
> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROCKETMQ/
> >> Podling+Report+January+2017
> >>>
> >>> Please contribute anything the wiki page that you feel should be
> included
> >>> in the final podling report as I plan to post the report to the IPMC
> >>> tomorrow.
> >>>
> >>> Bruce
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:08 AM, <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Dear podling,
> >>>>
> >>>> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> >>>> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> >>>> prepare your quarterly board report.
> >>>>
> >>>> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 January 2017, 10:30 am PDT.
> >>>> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> >>>> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> >>>> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> >>>> submission (Wed, January 04).
> >>>>
> >>>> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> >>>> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> >>>> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the
> board
> >>>> meeting.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> The Apache Incubator PMC
> >>>>
> >>>> Submitting your Report
> >>>>
> >>>> ----------------------
> >>>>
> >>>> Your report should contain the following:
> >>>>
> >>>> * Your project name
> >>>> * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> >>>> the project or necessarily of its field
> >>>> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> >>>> towards graduation.
> >>>> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to
> be
> >>>> aware of
> >>>> * How has the community developed since the last report
> >>>> * How has the project developed since the last report.
> >>>>
> >>>> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017
> >>>>
> >>>> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> >>>> this page is created from a template.
> >>>>
> >>>> Mentors
> >>>> -------
> >>>>
> >>>> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off
> on
> >>>> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> >>>> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> >>>> for the Incubator PMC.
> >>>>
> >>>> Incubator PMC
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> perl -e 'print
> >>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
> >>>
> >>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> >>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> >>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > perl -e 'print
> > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
> >
> > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> > Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>
>
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>.
Hi Bruce,
vintagewang and lollipop are real confluence name. At the same time, they are ASF usernames ;-)
> 在 2017年1月3日，23:23，Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> Hi Von,
>
> I need the Confluence usernames for the guys, not the ASF usernames.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I have contributed some points for our first podling report :-)
>>
>>
>> A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards
>> graduation
>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be aware
>> of
>>
>>
>> I am not sure whether we are applicable to answer these problems. So, just
>> let them blank :-)
>>
>>
>> BTW, we found the following committer guys have not been granted for wiki.
>> @Bruce, could you help us :-)
>>
>> wiki name list:
>>
>> vintagewang
>> lollipop
>>
>>
>>> 在 2017年1月3日，03:02，Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> 写道：
>>>
>>> I have updated the January podling report on the following wiki page:
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROCKETMQ/
>> Podling+Report+January+2017
>>>
>>> Please contribute anything the wiki page that you feel should be included
>>> in the final podling report as I plan to post the report to the IPMC
>>> tomorrow.
>>>
>>> Bruce
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:08 AM, <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear podling,
>>>>
>>>> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
>>>> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
>>>> prepare your quarterly board report.
>>>>
>>>> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 January 2017, 10:30 am PDT.
>>>> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
>>>> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
>>>> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
>>>> submission (Wed, January 04).
>>>>
>>>> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
>>>> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
>>>> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
>>>> meeting.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> The Apache Incubator PMC
>>>>
>>>> Submitting your Report
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------
>>>>
>>>> Your report should contain the following:
>>>>
>>>> * Your project name
>>>> * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
>>>> the project or necessarily of its field
>>>> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
>>>> towards graduation.
>>>> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
>>>> aware of
>>>> * How has the community developed since the last report
>>>> * How has the project developed since the last report.
>>>>
>>>> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>>>>
>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017
>>>>
>>>> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
>>>> this page is created from a template.
>>>>
>>>> Mentors
>>>> -------
>>>>
>>>> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
>>>> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
>>>> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
>>>> for the Incubator PMC.
>>>>
>>>> Incubator PMC
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> perl -e 'print
>>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>>>
>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
>>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Willem,
Just added you.
John
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:58 PM Willem Jiang <wi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Could you grant the edit right to my wiki account (willemjiang)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Willem Jiang
>
> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
> http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese)
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Von,
> >
> > I need the Confluence usernames for the guys, not the ASF usernames.
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I have contributed some points for our first podling report :-)
> > >
> > >
> > > A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> towards
> > > graduation
> > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> > aware
> > > of
> > >
> > >
> > > I am not sure whether we are applicable to answer these problems. So,
> > just
> > > let them blank :-)
> > >
> > >
> > > BTW, we found the following committer guys have not been granted for
> > wiki.
> > > @Bruce, could you help us :-)
> > >
> > > wiki name list:
> > >
> > > vintagewang
> > > lollipop
> > >
> > >
> > > > 在 2017年1月3日，03:02，Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> 写道：
> > > >
> > > > I have updated the January podling report on the following wiki page:
> > > >
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROCKETMQ/
> > > Podling+Report+January+2017
> > > >
> > > > Please contribute anything the wiki page that you feel should be
> > included
> > > > in the final podling report as I plan to post the report to the IPMC
> > > > tomorrow.
> > > >
> > > > Bruce
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:08 AM, <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Dear podling,
> > > >>
> > > >> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> > > >> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time
> to
> > > >> prepare your quarterly board report.
> > > >>
> > > >> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 January 2017, 10:30 am
> PDT.
> > > >> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> > > >> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2
> weeks
> > > >> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> > > >> submission (Wed, January 04).
> > > >>
> > > >> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the
> Incubator
> > > >> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> > > >> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the
> > board
> > > >> meeting.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >>
> > > >> The Apache Incubator PMC
> > > >>
> > > >> Submitting your Report
> > > >>
> > > >> ----------------------
> > > >>
> > > >> Your report should contain the following:
> > > >>
> > > >> * Your project name
> > > >> * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge
> of
> > > >> the project or necessarily of its field
> > > >> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> > > >> towards graduation.
> > > >> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need
> to
> > be
> > > >> aware of
> > > >> * How has the community developed since the last report
> > > >> * How has the project developed since the last report.
> > > >>
> > > >> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
> > > >>
> > > >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017
> > > >>
> > > >> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little
> before
> > > >> this page is created from a template.
> > > >>
> > > >> Mentors
> > > >> -------
> > > >>
> > > >> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off
> > on
> > > >> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> > > >> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise
> alarms
> > > >> for the Incubator PMC.
> > > >>
> > > >> Incubator PMC
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > perl -e 'print
> > > > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> > );'
> > > >
> > > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> > > > Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> > > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > perl -e 'print
> > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
> >
> > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> > Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> >
>
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by Willem Jiang <wi...@gmail.com>.
Hi Bruce,
Could you grant the edit right to my wiki account (willemjiang)?
Thanks,
Willem Jiang
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Von,
>
> I need the Confluence usernames for the guys, not the ASF usernames.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I have contributed some points for our first podling report :-)
> >
> >
> > A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards
> > graduation
> > Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> aware
> > of
> >
> >
> > I am not sure whether we are applicable to answer these problems. So,
> just
> > let them blank :-)
> >
> >
> > BTW, we found the following committer guys have not been granted for
> wiki.
> > @Bruce, could you help us :-)
> >
> > wiki name list:
> >
> > vintagewang
> > lollipop
> >
> >
> > > 在 2017年1月3日，03:02，Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> 写道：
> > >
> > > I have updated the January podling report on the following wiki page:
> > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROCKETMQ/
> > Podling+Report+January+2017
> > >
> > > Please contribute anything the wiki page that you feel should be
> included
> > > in the final podling report as I plan to post the report to the IPMC
> > > tomorrow.
> > >
> > > Bruce
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:08 AM, <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Dear podling,
> > >>
> > >> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> > >> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> > >> prepare your quarterly board report.
> > >>
> > >> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 January 2017, 10:30 am PDT.
> > >> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> > >> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> > >> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> > >> submission (Wed, January 04).
> > >>
> > >> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> > >> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> > >> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the
> board
> > >> meeting.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> The Apache Incubator PMC
> > >>
> > >> Submitting your Report
> > >>
> > >> ----------------------
> > >>
> > >> Your report should contain the following:
> > >>
> > >> * Your project name
> > >> * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> > >> the project or necessarily of its field
> > >> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> > >> towards graduation.
> > >> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to
> be
> > >> aware of
> > >> * How has the community developed since the last report
> > >> * How has the project developed since the last report.
> > >>
> > >> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
> > >>
> > >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017
> > >>
> > >> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> > >> this page is created from a template.
> > >>
> > >> Mentors
> > >> -------
> > >>
> > >> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off
> on
> > >> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> > >> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> > >> for the Incubator PMC.
> > >>
> > >> Incubator PMC
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > perl -e 'print
> > > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
> > >
> > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> > > Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
Hi Von,
I need the Confluence usernames for the guys, not the ASF usernames.
Bruce
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org> wrote:
> I have contributed some points for our first podling report :-)
>
>
> A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards
> graduation
> Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be aware
> of
>
>
> I am not sure whether we are applicable to answer these problems. So, just
> let them blank :-)
>
>
> BTW, we found the following committer guys have not been granted for wiki.
> @Bruce, could you help us :-)
>
> wiki name list:
>
> vintagewang
> lollipop
>
>
> > 在 2017年1月3日，03:02，Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> 写道：
> >
> > I have updated the January podling report on the following wiki page:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROCKETMQ/
> Podling+Report+January+2017
> >
> > Please contribute anything the wiki page that you feel should be included
> > in the final podling report as I plan to post the report to the IPMC
> > tomorrow.
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:08 AM, <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear podling,
> >>
> >> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> >> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> >> prepare your quarterly board report.
> >>
> >> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 January 2017, 10:30 am PDT.
> >> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> >> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> >> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> >> submission (Wed, January 04).
> >>
> >> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> >> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> >> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
> >> meeting.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> The Apache Incubator PMC
> >>
> >> Submitting your Report
> >>
> >> ----------------------
> >>
> >> Your report should contain the following:
> >>
> >> * Your project name
> >> * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> >> the project or necessarily of its field
> >> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> >> towards graduation.
> >> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> >> aware of
> >> * How has the community developed since the last report
> >> * How has the project developed since the last report.
> >>
> >> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
> >>
> >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017
> >>
> >> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> >> this page is created from a template.
> >>
> >> Mentors
> >> -------
> >>
> >> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
> >> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> >> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> >> for the Incubator PMC.
> >>
> >> Incubator PMC
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > perl -e 'print
> > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
> >
> > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> > Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>
>
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>.
We want to develop diversity community, never thought I'd see it dominated by single one vendor. john :-) Also this reason, we have drafted a new vendor-neutral spec for messaging and streaming solutions in 4.1.0 version.
Thanks for your link about review board. Let's take a closer look at it.
> 在 2017年1月3日，19:50，John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> 写道：
>
> Not sure if it helps for CTR/RTC, ASF does host a review board instance (
> https://reviews.apache.org <https://reviews.apache.org/> ).
>
> Personally, I agree with Justin's sentiments about process. I do see a
> number of projects that use RTC. They're generally projects dominated by a
> single vendor.
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 6:22 AM Von Gosling <vongosling@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 1. Refer to RTC or CTR problem
>>
>> For commit, may be, we could use CTR. For PR, we would prefer to RTC. We
>> are high valuing the quality in RocketMQ. So, it is a better way to use the
>> conservative strategy from my opinion :-)
>>
>> 2. Refer to PPMC and committer relationship
>> Thanks Justin refers. We are not familiar with Apache recommended way for
>> this problem. But i have learn about something about PMC additional
>> responsibilities. IMO, we really want to keep the community diversity.
>> Committer may be a good candidate for entering into PMC. For the same
>> reason, contributor may be a good candidate for becoming Committer.
>>
>> AFAIK, Apache Tomcat have separate the PMC member and committer role. And,
>> Apache Storm may regard as the committer as PMC member when someone make a
>> great achievement for the project[1].
>>
>> 1. http://storm.apache.org/contribute/People.html <
>> http://storm.apache.org/contribute/People.html <http://storm.apache.org/contribute/People.html>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> 在 2017年1月3日，16:33，Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> 写道：
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> IMO, not only the number of PR, more concerned about the quality of PR.
>>>
>>> Just try not to have the bar too high / wait too long to vote potential
>> candidates in. This may discourage people being invoved and hinder
>> community growth. But it’s totally up to this PPMC to decide this.
>>>
>>>> PPMC number of members should be less than the number of committer,
>> IMHO,
>>>> the committers are not all PPMC.
>>>
>>> Which is fine being a PPMC/PMC member had additional responsibilities [1]
>>>
>>>> RTC +1 The reference quality is the first priority.
>>>
>>> JFYI This is uncommon in Apache projects and all projects I have been
>> involved in have been CTR. In CTR any commit is just a revert away. I’ve
>> not seen many cases where it’s been an issue, especially where you have
>> good test coverage and code quality metrics. But again it’s totally up to
>> the PPMC to decide.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Justin
>>>
>>> 1. https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#policy
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
Review Board is really nice if the project decides to adopt the RTC model
because it can hook directly into the git commit process preventing commits
until the review has completed successfully. I have used it with great
success in the past on a project with more than 30 team members committing
and it worked well, but this was not an open source project. At any rate,
it's something to consider.
I know that there is a concern about the quality of the code, so in
addition to considering RTC, I suggest first considering the establishment
of standards for the Definition of Done for any contribution and publishing
them in the wiki. E.g., code is not considered complete without unit tests,
integration tests and documentation. Establishing and communicating such
requirements in the beginning will set the expectations now for all
contributors.
Most projects that adopt the RTC model do so in order to strictly control
incoming changes to the code base. Tomcat is a good example -- the project
keeps very tight control over changes because it is such a critical piece
of infrastructure for so many users.
Bruce
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 5:50 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Not sure if it helps for CTR/RTC, ASF does host a review board instance (
> https://reviews.apache.org ).
>
> Personally, I agree with Justin's sentiments about process. I do see a
> number of projects that use RTC. They're generally projects dominated by a
> single vendor.
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 6:22 AM Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > 1. Refer to RTC or CTR problem
> >
> > For commit, may be, we could use CTR. For PR, we would prefer to RTC. We
> > are high valuing the quality in RocketMQ. So, it is a better way to use
> the
> > conservative strategy from my opinion :-)
> >
> > 2. Refer to PPMC and committer relationship
> > Thanks Justin refers. We are not familiar with Apache recommended way for
> > this problem. But i have learn about something about PMC additional
> > responsibilities. IMO, we really want to keep the community diversity.
> > Committer may be a good candidate for entering into PMC. For the same
> > reason, contributor may be a good candidate for becoming Committer.
> >
> > AFAIK, Apache Tomcat have separate the PMC member and committer role.
> And,
> > Apache Storm may regard as the committer as PMC member when someone make
> a
> > great achievement for the project[1].
> >
> > 1. http://storm.apache.org/contribute/People.html <
> > http://storm.apache.org/contribute/People.html>
> >
> >
> >
> > > 在 2017年1月3日，16:33，Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> 写道：
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >> IMO, not only the number of PR, more concerned about the quality of
> PR.
> > >
> > > Just try not to have the bar too high / wait too long to vote potential
> > candidates in. This may discourage people being invoved and hinder
> > community growth. But it’s totally up to this PPMC to decide this.
> > >
> > >> PPMC number of members should be less than the number of committer,
> > IMHO,
> > >> the committers are not all PPMC.
> > >
> > > Which is fine being a PPMC/PMC member had additional responsibilities
> [1]
> > >
> > >> RTC +1 The reference quality is the first priority.
> > >
> > > JFYI This is uncommon in Apache projects and all projects I have been
> > involved in have been CTR. In CTR any commit is just a revert away. I’ve
> > not seen many cases where it’s been an issue, especially where you have
> > good test coverage and code quality metrics. But again it’s totally up to
> > the PPMC to decide.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Justin
> > >
> > > 1. https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#policy
> >
> >
>
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Not sure if it helps for CTR/RTC, ASF does host a review board instance (
https://reviews.apache.org ).
Personally, I agree with Justin's sentiments about process. I do see a
number of projects that use RTC. They're generally projects dominated by a
single vendor.
John
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 6:22 AM Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1. Refer to RTC or CTR problem
>
> For commit, may be, we could use CTR. For PR, we would prefer to RTC. We
> are high valuing the quality in RocketMQ. So, it is a better way to use the
> conservative strategy from my opinion :-)
>
> 2. Refer to PPMC and committer relationship
> Thanks Justin refers. We are not familiar with Apache recommended way for
> this problem. But i have learn about something about PMC additional
> responsibilities. IMO, we really want to keep the community diversity.
> Committer may be a good candidate for entering into PMC. For the same
> reason, contributor may be a good candidate for becoming Committer.
>
> AFAIK, Apache Tomcat have separate the PMC member and committer role. And,
> Apache Storm may regard as the committer as PMC member when someone make a
> great achievement for the project[1].
>
> 1. http://storm.apache.org/contribute/People.html <
> http://storm.apache.org/contribute/People.html>
>
>
>
> > 在 2017年1月3日，16:33，Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> 写道：
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> IMO, not only the number of PR, more concerned about the quality of PR.
> >
> > Just try not to have the bar too high / wait too long to vote potential
> candidates in. This may discourage people being invoved and hinder
> community growth. But it’s totally up to this PPMC to decide this.
> >
> >> PPMC number of members should be less than the number of committer,
> IMHO,
> >> the committers are not all PPMC.
> >
> > Which is fine being a PPMC/PMC member had additional responsibilities [1]
> >
> >> RTC +1 The reference quality is the first priority.
> >
> > JFYI This is uncommon in Apache projects and all projects I have been
> involved in have been CTR. In CTR any commit is just a revert away. I’ve
> not seen many cases where it’s been an issue, especially where you have
> good test coverage and code quality metrics. But again it’s totally up to
> the PPMC to decide.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> >
> > 1. https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#policy
>
>
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>.
> so I highly recommend
> considering the community participation aspect of a potential committer.
> Utilizing The Apache Way is the most important aspect to creating a healthy
> project and community over time.
Alright :-)
> But while we are just beginning, I do not recommend
> immediately adopting the model where committer automatically equals PMC
> member. Changing this can be discussed at a later time when the project is
> more mature and is more comfortable acting as a cohesive group.
+1. Nowadays, we may focus our eyes on how to build a more mature and cohesive group :-)
> 在 2017年1月3日，23:37，Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> I agree in general -- the bar for commit should not be too high at the
> moment, but it should be a sliding scale over time as the project matures
> further so that the bar is higher. Learning, practicing and embodying The
> Apache Way is the ultimate goal of ASF incubation, so I highly recommend
> considering the community participation aspect of a potential committer.
> Utilizing The Apache Way is the most important aspect to creating a healthy
> project and community over time.
>
> I have learned from experience that the PPMC should be carefully chosen and
> the traditional ASF model of roles that Von mentioned is the best way to
> start. E.g., a contributor might become a committer if s/he demonstrates
> the right stuff, a committer might become a PMC member if s/he demonstrates
> the right stuff.
> Bruce
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Von Gosling <vongosling@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 1. Refer to RTC or CTR problem
>>
>> For commit, may be, we could use CTR. For PR, we would prefer to RTC. We
>> are high valuing the quality in RocketMQ. So, it is a better way to use the
>> conservative strategy from my opinion :-)
>>
>> 2. Refer to PPMC and committer relationship
>> Thanks Justin refers. We are not familiar with Apache recommended way for
>> this problem. But i have learn about something about PMC additional
>> responsibilities. IMO, we really want to keep the community diversity.
>> Committer may be a good candidate for entering into PMC. For the same
>> reason, contributor may be a good candidate for becoming Committer.
>>
>> AFAIK, Apache Tomcat have separate the PMC member and committer role. And,
>> Apache Storm may regard as the committer as PMC member when someone make a
>> great achievement for the project[1].
>>
>> 1. http://storm.apache.org/contribute/People.html <
>> http://storm.apache.org/contribute/People.html <http://storm.apache.org/contribute/People.html>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> 在 2017年1月3日，16:33，Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> 写道：
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> IMO, not only the number of PR, more concerned about the quality of PR.
>>>
>>> Just try not to have the bar too high / wait too long to vote potential
>> candidates in. This may discourage people being invoved and hinder
>> community growth. But it’s totally up to this PPMC to decide this.
>>>
>>>> PPMC number of members should be less than the number of committer,
>> IMHO,
>>>> the committers are not all PPMC.
>>>
>>> Which is fine being a PPMC/PMC member had additional responsibilities [1]
>>>
>>>> RTC +1 The reference quality is the first priority.
>>>
>>> JFYI This is uncommon in Apache projects and all projects I have been
>> involved in have been CTR. In CTR any commit is just a revert away. I’ve
>> not seen many cases where it’s been an issue, especially where you have
>> good test coverage and code quality metrics. But again it’s totally up to
>> the PPMC to decide.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Justin
>>>
>>> 1. https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#policy
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ <http://bit.ly/2je6cQ>
> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bsnyder.org/> <http://bruceblog.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder <http://twitter.com/brucesnyder>
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
I agree in general -- the bar for commit should not be too high at the
moment, but it should be a sliding scale over time as the project matures
further so that the bar is higher. Learning, practicing and embodying The
Apache Way is the ultimate goal of ASF incubation, so I highly recommend
considering the community participation aspect of a potential committer.
Utilizing The Apache Way is the most important aspect to creating a healthy
project and community over time.
I have learned from experience that the PPMC should be carefully chosen and
the traditional ASF model of roles that Von mentioned is the best way to
start. E.g., a contributor might become a committer if s/he demonstrates
the right stuff, a committer might become a PMC member if s/he demonstrates
the right stuff. But while we are just beginning, I do not recommend
immediately adopting the model where committer automatically equals PMC
member. Changing this can be discussed at a later time when the project is
more mature and is more comfortable acting as a cohesive group.
Bruce
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1. Refer to RTC or CTR problem
>
> For commit, may be, we could use CTR. For PR, we would prefer to RTC. We
> are high valuing the quality in RocketMQ. So, it is a better way to use the
> conservative strategy from my opinion :-)
>
> 2. Refer to PPMC and committer relationship
> Thanks Justin refers. We are not familiar with Apache recommended way for
> this problem. But i have learn about something about PMC additional
> responsibilities. IMO, we really want to keep the community diversity.
> Committer may be a good candidate for entering into PMC. For the same
> reason, contributor may be a good candidate for becoming Committer.
>
> AFAIK, Apache Tomcat have separate the PMC member and committer role. And,
> Apache Storm may regard as the committer as PMC member when someone make a
> great achievement for the project[1].
>
> 1. http://storm.apache.org/contribute/People.html <
> http://storm.apache.org/contribute/People.html>
>
>
>
> > 在 2017年1月3日，16:33，Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> 写道：
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> IMO, not only the number of PR, more concerned about the quality of PR.
> >
> > Just try not to have the bar too high / wait too long to vote potential
> candidates in. This may discourage people being invoved and hinder
> community growth. But it’s totally up to this PPMC to decide this.
> >
> >> PPMC number of members should be less than the number of committer,
> IMHO,
> >> the committers are not all PPMC.
> >
> > Which is fine being a PPMC/PMC member had additional responsibilities [1]
> >
> >> RTC +1 The reference quality is the first priority.
> >
> > JFYI This is uncommon in Apache projects and all projects I have been
> involved in have been CTR. In CTR any commit is just a revert away. I’ve
> not seen many cases where it’s been an issue, especially where you have
> good test coverage and code quality metrics. But again it’s totally up to
> the PPMC to decide.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> >
> > 1. https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#policy
>
>
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>.
Hi,
1. Refer to RTC or CTR problem
For commit, may be, we could use CTR. For PR, we would prefer to RTC. We are high valuing the quality in RocketMQ. So, it is a better way to use the conservative strategy from my opinion :-)
2. Refer to PPMC and committer relationship
Thanks Justin refers. We are not familiar with Apache recommended way for this problem. But i have learn about something about PMC additional responsibilities. IMO, we really want to keep the community diversity. Committer may be a good candidate for entering into PMC. For the same reason, contributor may be a good candidate for becoming Committer.
AFAIK, Apache Tomcat have separate the PMC member and committer role. And, Apache Storm may regard as the committer as PMC member when someone make a great achievement for the project[1].
1. http://storm.apache.org/contribute/People.html <http://storm.apache.org/contribute/People.html>
> 在 2017年1月3日，16:33，Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> 写道：
>
> Hi,
>
>> IMO, not only the number of PR, more concerned about the quality of PR.
>
> Just try not to have the bar too high / wait too long to vote potential candidates in. This may discourage people being invoved and hinder community growth. But it’s totally up to this PPMC to decide this.
>
>> PPMC number of members should be less than the number of committer, IMHO,
>> the committers are not all PPMC.
>
> Which is fine being a PPMC/PMC member had additional responsibilities [1]
>
>> RTC +1 The reference quality is the first priority.
>
> JFYI This is uncommon in Apache projects and all projects I have been involved in have been CTR. In CTR any commit is just a revert away. I’ve not seen many cases where it’s been an issue, especially where you have good test coverage and code quality metrics. But again it’s totally up to the PPMC to decide.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#policy
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by yukon <yu...@apache.org>.
Hi,
I agree with Justin that we shouldn't set a too high bar, but IMO there
should be some clearly defined rules about when vote potential candidates
in.
As for CTR or RTC, how about CTR for committers and RTC for other
contributors ?
Thanks,
yukon
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > IMO, not only the number of PR, more concerned about the quality of PR.
>
> Just try not to have the bar too high / wait too long to vote potential
> candidates in. This may discourage people being invoved and hinder
> community growth. But it’s totally up to this PPMC to decide this.
>
> > PPMC number of members should be less than the number of committer, IMHO,
> > the committers are not all PPMC.
>
> Which is fine being a PPMC/PMC member had additional responsibilities [1]
>
> > RTC +1 The reference quality is the first priority.
>
> JFYI This is uncommon in Apache projects and all projects I have been
> involved in have been CTR. In CTR any commit is just a revert away. I’ve
> not seen many cases where it’s been an issue, especially where you have
> good test coverage and code quality metrics. But again it’s totally up to
> the PPMC to decide.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#policy
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> IMO, not only the number of PR, more concerned about the quality of PR.
Just try not to have the bar too high / wait too long to vote potential candidates in. This may discourage people being invoved and hinder community growth. But it’s totally up to this PPMC to decide this.
> PPMC number of members should be less than the number of committer, IMHO,
> the committers are not all PPMC.
Which is fine being a PPMC/PMC member had additional responsibilities [1]
> RTC +1 The reference quality is the first priority.
JFYI This is uncommon in Apache projects and all projects I have been involved in have been CTR. In CTR any commit is just a revert away. I’ve not seen many cases where it’s been an issue, especially where you have good test coverage and code quality metrics. But again it’s totally up to the PPMC to decide.
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#policy
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by vintagewang <vi...@apache.org>.
Hi,
*"[1] Is it just a few pull requests and some interaction on the mailing
list or perhaps something more? This varies from project to project. I
think it's likely we have a couple of potential candidates given the number
of PRs so far. Also do we want PPMC == committers or not?"*
IMO, not only the number of PR, more concerned about the quality of PR. PR
quality is more difficult to quantify, I believe that PPMC members are very
professional people, through the discussion together, we will eventually be
able to select the valuable committers.
PPMC number of members should be less than the number of committer, IMHO,
the committers are not all PPMC.
*"[2] One other thing to consider is do we want the project to be CTR
(commit then review) or RTC (review then commit). *
*It currently seems a little more RTC than CTR to me?"*
RTC +1
The reference quality is the first priority.
Regards
vintagewang
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It’s probably easier to reply here and edit a wiki page if you don’t have
> access.
>
> Re three issues towards graduation I would list these, but there may be
> others.
> 1. Confirm the IP review is complete.
> 2. Make our first Apache release
> 3. Vote in our first committer / PMC members
>
> For the 3rd point we should probably have a discussion on this list on
> what does someone need to do in order to be considered a committer. [1] Is
> it just a few pull requests and some interaction on the mailing list or
> perhaps something more? This varies from project to project. I think it's
> likely we have a couple of potential candidates given the number of PRs so
> far. Also do we want PPMC == committers or not?
>
> One other thing to consider is do we want the project to be CTR (commit
> then review) or RTC (review then commit). [2] It currently seems a little
> more RTC than CTR to me?
>
> Thank,
> Justin
>
> 1. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html (see Adding New
> Committers)
> 2. https://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#CommitThenReview
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
It’s probably easier to reply here and edit a wiki page if you don’t have access.
Re three issues towards graduation I would list these, but there may be others.
1. Confirm the IP review is complete.
2. Make our first Apache release
3. Vote in our first committer / PMC members
For the 3rd point we should probably have a discussion on this list on what does someone need to do in order to be considered a committer. [1] Is it just a few pull requests and some interaction on the mailing list or perhaps something more? This varies from project to project. I think it's likely we have a couple of potential candidates given the number of PRs so far. Also do we want PPMC == committers or not?
One other thing to consider is do we want the project to be CTR (commit then review) or RTC (review then commit). [2] It currently seems a little more RTC than CTR to me?
Thank,
Justin
1. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html (see Adding New Committers)
2. https://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#CommitThenReview
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>.
I have contributed some points for our first podling report :-)
A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation
Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be aware of
I am not sure whether we are applicable to answer these problems. So, just let them blank :-)
BTW, we found the following committer guys have not been granted for wiki. @Bruce, could you help us :-)
wiki name list:
vintagewang
lollipop
> 在 2017年1月3日，03:02，Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> I have updated the January podling report on the following wiki page:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROCKETMQ/Podling+Report+January+2017
>
> Please contribute anything the wiki page that you feel should be included
> in the final podling report as I plan to post the report to the IPMC
> tomorrow.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:08 AM, <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear podling,
>>
>> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
>> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
>> prepare your quarterly board report.
>>
>> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 January 2017, 10:30 am PDT.
>> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
>> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
>> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
>> submission (Wed, January 04).
>>
>> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
>> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
>> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
>> meeting.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> The Apache Incubator PMC
>>
>> Submitting your Report
>>
>> ----------------------
>>
>> Your report should contain the following:
>>
>> * Your project name
>> * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
>> the project or necessarily of its field
>> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
>> towards graduation.
>> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
>> aware of
>> * How has the community developed since the last report
>> * How has the project developed since the last report.
>>
>> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>>
>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017
>>
>> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
>> this page is created from a template.
>>
>> Mentors
>> -------
>>
>> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
>> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
>> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
>> for the Incubator PMC.
>>
>> Incubator PMC
>>
>
>
>
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
Thank you, Justin. I'm not sure if the IP review is complete.
I have submitted the podling report via the Incubator wiki page.
Bruce
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > - A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> towards
> > graduation
>
> Here’s my suggestions:
> 1. Confirm the IP review is complete.
> 2. Make our first Apache release
> 3. Vote in our first committer / PMC members
>
> Is 1 complete?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> - A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards
> graduation
Here’s my suggestions:
1. Confirm the IP review is complete.
2. Make our first Apache release
3. Vote in our first committer / PMC members
Is 1 complete?
Thanks,
Justin
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
John and Justin,
The one item where I would like some guidance is with the following item in
the report:
- A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards
graduation
I'm not sure what the IPMC would like to see in this item specifically
beyond what the project believes is important for graduation.
Can you guys please provide some advice on this item?
Bruce
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have updated the January podling report on the following wiki page:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROCKETMQ/
> Podling+Report+January+2017
>
> Please contribute anything the wiki page that you feel should be included
> in the final podling report as I plan to post the report to the IPMC
> tomorrow.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:08 AM, <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear podling,
>>
>> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
>> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
>> prepare your quarterly board report.
>>
>> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 January 2017, 10:30 am PDT.
>> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
>> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
>> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
>> submission (Wed, January 04).
>>
>> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
>> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
>> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
>> meeting.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> The Apache Incubator PMC
>>
>> Submitting your Report
>>
>> ----------------------
>>
>> Your report should contain the following:
>>
>> * Your project name
>> * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
>> the project or necessarily of its field
>> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
>> towards graduation.
>> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
>> aware of
>> * How has the community developed since the last report
>> * How has the project developed since the last report.
>>
>> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>>
>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017
>>
>> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
>> this page is created from a template.
>>
>> Mentors
>> -------
>>
>> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
>> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
>> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
>> for the Incubator PMC.
>>
>> Incubator PMC
>>
>
>
>
> --
> perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&
> 5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2017
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
I have updated the January podling report on the following wiki page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROCKETMQ/Podling+Report+January+2017
Please contribute anything the wiki page that you feel should be included
in the final podling report as I plan to post the report to the IPMC
tomorrow.
Bruce
On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:08 AM, <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Dear podling,
>
> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> prepare your quarterly board report.
>
> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 January 2017, 10:30 am PDT.
> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> submission (Wed, January 04).
>
> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
> meeting.
>
> Thanks,
>
> The Apache Incubator PMC
>
> Submitting your Report
>
> ----------------------
>
> Your report should contain the following:
>
> * Your project name
> * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> the project or necessarily of its field
> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> towards graduation.
> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> aware of
> * How has the community developed since the last report
> * How has the project developed since the last report.
>
> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017
>
> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> this page is created from a template.
>
> Mentors
> -------
>
> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> for the Incubator PMC.
>
> Incubator PMC
>
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder