You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2014/10/06 10:25:44 UTC

[Bug 7088] New: URIBL_RHS_DOB is not reliable

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7088

            Bug ID: 7088
           Summary: URIBL_RHS_DOB is not reliable
           Product: Spamassassin
           Version: 3.4.0
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Rules
          Assignee: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
          Reporter: marco@lanzotti.com

On http://www.support-intelligence.com/dob/ you can read:
[...] The list is currently in BETA and should be used accordingly. We still
have some kinks in it and occasionally domains older than five days, or other
important domains end up in the list [...]

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 7088] URIBL_RHS_DOB is not reliable

Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7088

Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kmcgrail@pccc.com

--- Comment #4 from Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> ---
URIBL_RHS_DOB is returning positives on every query.  Something is technically
wrong right now.  Recommend you set the score to 0 temporarily as this is
typically a good list and monitor the users mailing list.

Regards,
KAM

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 7088] URIBL_RHS_DOB is not reliable

Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7088

--- Comment #3 from AXB <ax...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to marco from comment #2)
> If my domain is a false positive in this list, averyone uses spamassassin
> thinks that my domain is very young.
> I think default score for this unreliable list must be lower.

if your domain is a false positive, you should report it to the list operators,
so they can look into improving their system.

on its own a score of 1.5 does not trigger a FP.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 7088] URIBL_RHS_DOB is not reliable

Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7088

AXB <ax...@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from AXB <ax...@gmail.com> ---
This has always been "beta".
It's a way of saying: no warranty

If it's a problem you can disable the rule by either setting:

score URIBL_RHS_DOB 0 

or with SA 3.4

dns_query_restriction deny sibl.support-intelligence.net

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 7088] URIBL_RHS_DOB is not reliable

Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7088

marco@lanzotti.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |marco@lanzotti.com

--- Comment #2 from marco@lanzotti.com ---
If my domain is a false positive in this list, averyone uses spamassassin
thinks that my domain is very young.
I think default score for this unreliable list must be lower.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.