[jira] [Comment Edited] (THRIFT-3320) TMessages of multiplexed service responses of should include service names

["Xiaoshuang LU (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14737998#comment-14737998 ] 

Xiaoshuang LU edited comment on THRIFT-3320 at 9/10/15 5:22 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Jens, thanks for your comments.

Suppose a  scenario, let's say, clients use "TMultiplexedProtocol"s while servers run "TMultiplexedProcessor"s. The "TMessage"s encapsulated in requests appear like (name = serviceName:procedureName, type = call, seqid = blah_blah_blah). However response "TMessage"s lack serviceName in their name fields. I propose that both request and response "TMessage"s shall have the same values except their type fields.


was (Author: in-chief):
Hi Jens, thanks for your comments.

Suppose clients use "TMultiplexedProtocol"s while servers run "TMultiplexedProcessor"s. The "TMessage"s encapsulated in requests appear like (name = serviceName:procedureName, type = call, seqid = blah_blah_blah). However response "TMessage"s lack serviceName in their name fields. I propose that both request and response "TMessage"s shall have the same format except their type fields.

> TMessages of multiplexed service responses of should include service names
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-3320
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3320
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: Java - Library
>    Affects Versions: 0.9, 0.9.1, 0.9.2
>            Reporter: Xiaoshuang LU
>         Attachments: THRIFT-3320.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)