You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Dave Fisher <da...@comcast.net> on 2017/09/14 18:55:16 UTC
Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be
FlexJS?
Hi -
I am not available for anything until Saturday. I’m done.
I proposed the process as far as I can tell there is not even a consensus on what other names to vote on other than Royale. I consider this move to squash the vote to be steamrolling. I explained it yesterday to proceed in parallel.
There is no reason not to proceed with the VOTE. I am not rescinding it. Plenty of time was given to discuss this I gave a ballot and warned people what it would be.
Regards,
Dave
> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:28 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name? I don't
> want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent" <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
>> No (binding)
>>
>> On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher" <da...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
>>>
>>> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
>>> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
>>> discussed.
>>> [ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called.
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
>>>
>>
>