[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1145) As a CouchApp developer, I'd like access to a listing of local-only (_local) docs.

["ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14312761#comment-14312761 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on COUCHDB-1145:
----------------------------------------------------------

Commit 166be1b5f804d958d73ad5995f1f6ad433a347cf in couchdb's branch refs/heads/developer-preview-2.0 from [~kxepal]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;h=166be1b ]

Merge remote-tracking branch 'iilyak/1145-_local_docs-handler'

This closes #291

COUCHDB-1145


> As a CouchApp developer, I'd like access to a listing of local-only (_local) docs.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-1145
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1145
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: HTTP Interface
>            Reporter: Benjamin Young
>            Assignee: ILYA
>              Labels: api-addition, futon
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> I'm seeing an increased use of _local/{doc}  in CouchApps for storing local config data that should not be replicated for security reasons or because they want it to stay local for instance identification.
> Currently, those docs can only be retrieved if the app developer knows they're there--which may be fine for the app developer. However, if the local user/admin who installed the CouchApp wanted to see the data stored, they can't--at least not via Futon...they'd have to use some pretty complex Erlang via the Erlang shell (re: davisp).
> Please consider making _local doc listing available to the REST API, so it can be exposed to Futon (and others).
> Thanks.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)