[jira] [Commented] (TUSCANY-3884) binding.sca local delegation

["Scott Kurz (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054524#comment-13054524 ] 

Scott Kurz commented on TUSCANY-3884:
-------------------------------------

Simon, 

You're talking about local as in colocated (single JVM), right?   Not local as in PBR, in contrast to remotable (PBV).    Just clarifying since most times I've seen the word "semantics" we're talking about PBR vs. PBV.

I'm not just nitpicking since there are some data-related semantics associated with the current colocated code.   By this I'm referring to the use of Mediator.copyXXX rather than the use of the mediateXXX methods invoked by the DataTransformationInterceptor.    The copy results in a different object graph than the DTI and also I believe does not use wrapper->wrapper transform whereas the DTI typically does in our default Java/JAXB use case.

But I think you're mostly referring to delegating to the provider impl like we do with the non-colocated (distributable) case?

> binding.sca local delegation
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-3884
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3884
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-Beta2
>            Reporter: Simon Laws
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0
>
>
> Binding.sca currently delegates for remote semantics but implements local semantics in it's own provider. Should we create a separate local binding an delegate to that so it can we swapped out without affecting the provider functionality. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira