Performance comparison data

["KUROKAWA, Hiroyuki" <hi...@justsystem.co.jp>]

Hello,

I consider adopting James to our project
to handle mail messages from Java program.
To this adoption, I want to know the performance of James.

Do you have any performance comparison data.
How is James scalable, stable, fast compared with
other mail servers like qmail.

I could only find the description that
James version 2.1 is able to maintain a constant mail throughput 
rate of thousands of messages/minute for continuous periods.

If you have any information, please let me know.

Best Regards,

-- 
Hiroyuki Kurokawa / JUSTSYSTEM CORPORATION

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

RE: Performance comparison data

[Danny Angus <da...@apache.org>]

Hiroyuki,

We don't have any official data, but someone might have test results.

d.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: KUROKAWA, Hiroyuki [mailto:hiroyuki_kurokawa@justsystem.co.jp]
> Sent: 27 January 2003 13:39
> To: james-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: Performance comparison data
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I consider adopting James to our project
> to handle mail messages from Java program.
> To this adoption, I want to know the performance of James.
>
> Do you have any performance comparison data.
> How is James scalable, stable, fast compared with
> other mail servers like qmail.
>
> I could only find the description that
> James version 2.1 is able to maintain a constant mail throughput
> rate of thousands of messages/minute for continuous periods.
>
> If you have any information, please let me know.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> --
> Hiroyuki Kurokawa / JUSTSYSTEM CORPORATION
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>