You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by "Christian Kaltepoth (JIRA)" <de...@myfaces.apache.org> on 2009/03/25 19:48:01 UTC

[jira] Updated: (MYFACES-1902) Allow to use different ExpressionFactory implementation

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Christian Kaltepoth updated MYFACES-1902:
-----------------------------------------

    Status: Patch Available  (was: Open)

> Allow to use different ExpressionFactory implementation
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MYFACES-1902
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1902
>             Project: MyFaces Core
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Extension Feature
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.4-SNAPSHOT
>            Reporter: Christian Kaltepoth
>            Assignee: Matthias Weßendorf
>         Attachments: MYFACES-1902-webapp.zip, MYFACES-1902.patch
>
>
> It should be possible to use a different ExpressionFactory implementation. This feature is required
> to use 3rd party EL implementations like JBoss EL. Mojarra already supports this with the
> 'com.sun.faces.expressionFactory' context parameter.
> MyFaces Core 1.2.x already supports a context parameter 'org.apache.myfaces.EXPRESSION_FACTORY'
> but it is only evaluated in a JSP 2.0 environment (see MYFACES-1693 for details).
> It should be possible to use this parameter with JSP 2.1 as well. The corresponding code
> should be refactored from Jsp20FacesInitializer to AbstractFacesInitializer to be usable in both
> JSP 2.0 and 2.1.
> Discussion on myfaces-users:
> http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-expression-factory-td18867420.html

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.