You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@ofbiz.apache.org by BJ Freeman <bj...@free-man.net> on 2007/10/27 21:05:05 UTC
Ver 4.0 bugs reports
ooops sorry changed the subject.
BJ Freeman sent the following on 10/27/2007 12:01 PM:
> Now that the ver 4.0 app is in full swing with my client
> I am getting bug reports.
> It seems there is a push not to have these put in for ver4.0
> should I put them only for the Trunk?
> Does this change the priority of getting them fixed if not in the ver 4.0?
>
Re: Ver 4.0 bugs reports
Posted by BJ Freeman <bj...@free-man.net>.
My client
David E Jones sent the following on 10/27/2007 12:13 PM:
>
> On Oct 27, 2007, at 1:05 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>
>> ooops sorry changed the subject.
>>
>> BJ Freeman sent the following on 10/27/2007 12:01 PM:
>>> Now that the ver 4.0 app is in full swing with my client
>>> I am getting bug reports.
>>> It seems there is a push not to have these put in for ver4.0
>
> What leads you to think that? These are clearly very important.
>
>>> should I put them only for the Trunk?
>>> Does this change the priority of getting them fixed if not in the ver
>>> 4.0?
>
> It would be good to test against the trunk too, but you don't have to,
> just file the bug and select the 4.0 version and off you go...
>
> -David
>
>
Re: Ver 4.0 bugs reports
Posted by David E Jones <jo...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
On Oct 27, 2007, at 1:05 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
> ooops sorry changed the subject.
>
> BJ Freeman sent the following on 10/27/2007 12:01 PM:
>> Now that the ver 4.0 app is in full swing with my client
>> I am getting bug reports.
>> It seems there is a push not to have these put in for ver4.0
What leads you to think that? These are clearly very important.
>> should I put them only for the Trunk?
>> Does this change the priority of getting them fixed if not in the
>> ver 4.0?
It would be good to test against the trunk too, but you don't have
to, just file the bug and select the 4.0 version and off you go...
-David