You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jmeter.apache.org by Jmeter Tea <jm...@gmail.com> on 2018/08/02 05:51:17 UTC
CSS/JQuery Extractor
It seems that CSS/JQuery Extractor name is a bit confusing,
Because it actually used to extract *HTML *using CSS/JQuery syntax
Isn't it better to rename it to HTML Extractor or HTML DOM Extractor ?
Relevant question:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51644320/jmeter-how-to-use-the-jquery-not-css-extractor/51646040#51646040
Re: CSS/JQuery Extractor
Posted by Jmeter Tea <jm...@gmail.com>.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62593
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Philippe Mouawad <
p.mouawad@ubik-ingenierie.com> wrote:
> I agree.
> Html extractor looks better to me.
>
> Regards
>
> On Thursday, August 2, 2018, Jmeter Tea <jm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It seems that CSS/JQuery Extractor name is a bit confusing,
> > Because it actually used to extract *HTML *using CSS/JQuery syntax
> > Isn't it better to rename it to HTML Extractor or HTML DOM Extractor ?
> >
> > Relevant question:
> > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51644320/jmeter-how-
> > to-use-the-jquery-not-css-extractor/51646040#51646040
> >
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
> Ubik-Ingénierie
>
> UBIK LOAD PACK Web Site <http://www.ubikloadpack.com/>
>
> UBIK LOAD PACK on TWITTER <https://twitter.com/ubikloadpack>
>
Re: CSS/JQuery Extractor
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <p....@ubik-ingenierie.com>.
I agree.
Html extractor looks better to me.
Regards
On Thursday, August 2, 2018, Jmeter Tea <jm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems that CSS/JQuery Extractor name is a bit confusing,
> Because it actually used to extract *HTML *using CSS/JQuery syntax
> Isn't it better to rename it to HTML Extractor or HTML DOM Extractor ?
>
> Relevant question:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51644320/jmeter-how-
> to-use-the-jquery-not-css-extractor/51646040#51646040
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Ubik-Ingénierie
UBIK LOAD PACK Web Site <http://www.ubikloadpack.com/>
UBIK LOAD PACK on TWITTER <https://twitter.com/ubikloadpack>
Re: CSS/JQuery Extractor
Posted by Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
+1 for CSS Selector extractor
-1 for HTML Extractor, too confusing to mee
Antonio
Le jeu. 2 août 2018 à 10:12, UBIK LOAD PACK Support <
support@ubikloadpack.com> a écrit :
> Hello,
> Currently majority of Extractors are based on syntax:
>
> - XPath,
> - Regex,
> - Boundary,
> - CSS / JQuery
>
>
> Only JSON is based on format, but I remember it was due to JSON Path
> already being used.
>
> I think the issue with CSS/ JQuery is that name is maybe not clear to
> testers. Should it be CSS Selector extractor ?
> And should we by the way name JSON Extractor => JSON Path Extractor ?
>
> Regards
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Andrey Pokhilko <ap...@ya.ru> wrote:
>
> > HTML Extractor is also very generic name.
> >
> > Let's understand which naming tradition do we use consistently for
> > extractors - is it "by syntax used" or "by what it extracts"? Otherwise
> > users will be confused when use HTML Extractor and when Boundary
> > Extractor...
> >
> > I am for "by syntax used" since this is a tradition we have up to now
> > and it is less ambiguous.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Andrey Pokhilko
> >
> > 02.08.2018 11:01, Jmeter Tea пишет:
> > > Regex Extractor is more generic, it can extract from any text (JSON,
> > plain,
> > > XML, ....)
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Andrey Pokhilko <ap...@ya.ru> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> IMO name is fine, since it reflects the syntax. Regex Extractor also
> > >> extracts from HTML, XPath Extractor also extracts from HTML.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Andrey Pokhilko
> > >>
> > >> 02.08.2018 08:51, Jmeter Tea пишет:
> > >>> It seems that CSS/JQuery Extractor name is a bit confusing,
> > >>> Because it actually used to extract *HTML *using CSS/JQuery syntax
> > >>> Isn't it better to rename it to HTML Extractor or HTML DOM Extractor
> ?
> > >>>
> > >>> Relevant question:
> > >>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51644320/jmeter-how-
> > >> to-use-the-jquery-not-css-extractor/51646040#51646040
> > >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Regards
> Ubik Load Pack <http://ubikloadpack.com> Team
> Follow us on Twitter <http://twitter.com/ubikloadpack>
>
>
> Cordialement
> L'équipe Ubik Load Pack <http://ubikloadpack.com>
> Suivez-nous sur Twitter <http://twitter.com/ubikloadpack>
>
Re: CSS/JQuery Extractor
Posted by UBIK LOAD PACK Support <su...@ubikloadpack.com>.
Hello,
Currently majority of Extractors are based on syntax:
- XPath,
- Regex,
- Boundary,
- CSS / JQuery
Only JSON is based on format, but I remember it was due to JSON Path
already being used.
I think the issue with CSS/ JQuery is that name is maybe not clear to
testers. Should it be CSS Selector extractor ?
And should we by the way name JSON Extractor => JSON Path Extractor ?
Regards
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Andrey Pokhilko <ap...@ya.ru> wrote:
> HTML Extractor is also very generic name.
>
> Let's understand which naming tradition do we use consistently for
> extractors - is it "by syntax used" or "by what it extracts"? Otherwise
> users will be confused when use HTML Extractor and when Boundary
> Extractor...
>
> I am for "by syntax used" since this is a tradition we have up to now
> and it is less ambiguous.
>
> --
>
> Andrey Pokhilko
>
> 02.08.2018 11:01, Jmeter Tea пишет:
> > Regex Extractor is more generic, it can extract from any text (JSON,
> plain,
> > XML, ....)
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Andrey Pokhilko <ap...@ya.ru> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> IMO name is fine, since it reflects the syntax. Regex Extractor also
> >> extracts from HTML, XPath Extractor also extracts from HTML.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Andrey Pokhilko
> >>
> >> 02.08.2018 08:51, Jmeter Tea пишет:
> >>> It seems that CSS/JQuery Extractor name is a bit confusing,
> >>> Because it actually used to extract *HTML *using CSS/JQuery syntax
> >>> Isn't it better to rename it to HTML Extractor or HTML DOM Extractor ?
> >>>
> >>> Relevant question:
> >>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51644320/jmeter-how-
> >> to-use-the-jquery-not-css-extractor/51646040#51646040
> >>
>
>
--
Regards
Ubik Load Pack <http://ubikloadpack.com> Team
Follow us on Twitter <http://twitter.com/ubikloadpack>
Cordialement
L'équipe Ubik Load Pack <http://ubikloadpack.com>
Suivez-nous sur Twitter <http://twitter.com/ubikloadpack>
Re: CSS/JQuery Extractor
Posted by Andrey Pokhilko <ap...@ya.ru>.
HTML Extractor is also very generic name.
Let's understand which naming tradition do we use consistently for
extractors - is it "by syntax used" or "by what it extracts"? Otherwise
users will be confused when use HTML Extractor and when Boundary
Extractor...
I am for "by syntax used" since this is a tradition we have up to now
and it is less ambiguous.
--
Andrey Pokhilko
02.08.2018 11:01, Jmeter Tea пишет:
> Regex Extractor is more generic, it can extract from any text (JSON, plain,
> XML, ....)
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Andrey Pokhilko <ap...@ya.ru> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> IMO name is fine, since it reflects the syntax. Regex Extractor also
>> extracts from HTML, XPath Extractor also extracts from HTML.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Andrey Pokhilko
>>
>> 02.08.2018 08:51, Jmeter Tea пишет:
>>> It seems that CSS/JQuery Extractor name is a bit confusing,
>>> Because it actually used to extract *HTML *using CSS/JQuery syntax
>>> Isn't it better to rename it to HTML Extractor or HTML DOM Extractor ?
>>>
>>> Relevant question:
>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51644320/jmeter-how-
>> to-use-the-jquery-not-css-extractor/51646040#51646040
>>
Re: CSS/JQuery Extractor
Posted by Jmeter Tea <jm...@gmail.com>.
Regex Extractor is more generic, it can extract from any text (JSON, plain,
XML, ....)
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Andrey Pokhilko <ap...@ya.ru> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMO name is fine, since it reflects the syntax. Regex Extractor also
> extracts from HTML, XPath Extractor also extracts from HTML.
>
> --
>
> Andrey Pokhilko
>
> 02.08.2018 08:51, Jmeter Tea пишет:
> > It seems that CSS/JQuery Extractor name is a bit confusing,
> > Because it actually used to extract *HTML *using CSS/JQuery syntax
> > Isn't it better to rename it to HTML Extractor or HTML DOM Extractor ?
> >
> > Relevant question:
> > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51644320/jmeter-how-
> to-use-the-jquery-not-css-extractor/51646040#51646040
> >
>
>
Re: CSS/JQuery Extractor
Posted by Andrey Pokhilko <ap...@ya.ru>.
Hi,
IMO name is fine, since it reflects the syntax. Regex Extractor also
extracts from HTML, XPath Extractor also extracts from HTML.
--
Andrey Pokhilko
02.08.2018 08:51, Jmeter Tea пишет:
> It seems that CSS/JQuery Extractor name is a bit confusing,
> Because it actually used to extract *HTML *using CSS/JQuery syntax
> Isn't it better to rename it to HTML Extractor or HTML DOM Extractor ?
>
> Relevant question:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51644320/jmeter-how-to-use-the-jquery-not-css-extractor/51646040#51646040
>