Resolved open issues

[Amit Handa <Am...@Sun.COM>]

Hi,

There are a couple of issues/bugs which are resolved with patch submitted and integrated as well
but are still under "Open Issues" category.

Is there a way we can remove them from Open Issues or close them ?

Committers, kindly help.

thanks,
Amit

Re: Resolved open issues

[Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@debrunners.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Amit Handa wrote:
> Sure :
> http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-102
> Seems to be critical but resolved.
>
> Also
> http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-36
>
> This seems to be patched and resolved
> http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-73
>
> http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-89


DERBY-102 may require documentation fixes, so not resolved.

Derby-36 may be not be able to be reproduced, but it
does look like a vm bug we have seen before on AIX, where
inheritence of the run() method for privedged actions is not seen.
But the os they are running on looks like windows.

DERBY-73 has only partially been resolved.

DERBY-89 has not been resolved, the patch has not been applied yet, I'm
still working on it. Even after the patch they may be problems with the
intended functionality, so the bug may remain open.


Dan.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFB0uWrIv0S4qsbfuQRAouMAKDRh3un7KQpsIMX8D/S18+4L0LDLwCeNgzA
ndWuNc1bnb4C3+L5RBX1oK8=
=736g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: Resolved open issues

[Amit Handa <Am...@Sun.COM>]

Sure :
http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-102
Seems to be critical but resolved.

Also
http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-36

This seems to be patched and resolved
http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-73

http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-89

thanks,
Amit


Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Amit Handa wrote:
> 
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>There are a couple of issues/bugs which are resolved with patch
> 
> submitted and integrated as well
> 
>>but are still under "Open Issues" category.
>>
>>Is there a way we can remove them from Open Issues or close them ?
> 
> 
> Can you gave the Jira bug numbers?
> 
> Dan.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFB0ZgwIv0S4qsbfuQRAjVBAKDaFRtK4kN73o5f2KZ1wRLIt+cg5gCff0mf
> rGaz7aZxXC4rYtXA/JcRb5w=
> =Ois/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 


-- 
Regards,

Amit Handa,
JDBC Engineering, Java Web Services.
Sun Microsystems Inc.

Re: Resolved open issues

[Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@debrunners.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Amit Handa wrote:

> Hi,
>
> There are a couple of issues/bugs which are resolved with patch
submitted and integrated as well
> but are still under "Open Issues" category.
>
> Is there a way we can remove them from Open Issues or close them ?

Can you gave the Jira bug numbers?

Dan.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFB0ZgwIv0S4qsbfuQRAjVBAKDaFRtK4kN73o5f2KZ1wRLIt+cg5gCff0mf
rGaz7aZxXC4rYtXA/JcRb5w=
=Ois/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: Resolved open issues

["Jean T. Anderson" <jt...@bristowhill.com>]

Amit Handa wrote:

>There are a couple of issues/bugs which are resolved with patch submitted and integrated as well
>but are still under "Open Issues" category.
>
>Is there a way we can remove them from Open Issues or close them ?
>
>Committers, kindly help.
>  
>
Bugs don't require a committer to close -- or, at least, I don't think
they should based on the information Ron Reuben (our Derby Jira project
lead) put together:

http://incubator.apache.org/derby/DerbyBugGuidelines.html#%22Close%22+your+bug+once+it+is+%22Resolved%22

If any submitters have trouble closing a bug, please post so we can work
the logistics out.

 -jean