You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by Pe...@wcenter.de on 2007/03/09 17:05:37 UTC
Should mod_jk-1.2.21-apache-2.2.x-linux-i686 support Apache2.0 as well?
Hello,
I guess everyone has heard about the security issue that was fixed in
mod_jk recently.
I did install the new version, but since then I see a lot of log entries
from mod_jk like :
jk_uri_worker_map.c (614)]: In jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker,
wrong parameters
The Apache Log shows entries like
...
Destroying config 0x800b5c10
Creating new config (0x800d8060) for (null)
...
The maschines seem to work fine, but I suspect, I have installed a wrong
connector version.
My Tomcat 5.5 and Apache2.0 are on a MACHTYPE=i686-suse-linux
I installed mod_jk-1.2.21-apache-2.2.x-linux-i686.so as binary as there
is no linux binary for apache2.0.
I have not found decisive information about what version to use in the
documentation.
So here is my question at last: Should the mod_jk apache2.2 binary support
also apache 2.0 (and the errors are caused by something else)?
Kind regards,
Peter Henningsen
Senior Consultant
Re: Should mod_jk-1.2.21-apache-2.2.x-linux-i686 support Apache2.0 as well?
Posted by Pe...@wcenter.de.
Hello,
thanks for the clarification. I suspected something like this although the
maschine is still running reasonably well.
I will upgrade the Webserver to 2.2 as the present release came with
Oracle and seems to have no apxs-Files.
Thanks a lot,
Peter Henningsen
Senior Consultant
Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>
09.03.2007 20:49
Please respond to
"Tomcat Users List" <us...@tomcat.apache.org>
To
Tomcat Users List <us...@tomcat.apache.org>
cc
Subject
<SPAM> Re: Should mod_jk-1.2.21-apache-2.2.x-linux-i686 support Apache2.0
as well?
Hello,
module binaries for Apache httpd 2.0 and 2.2 are definitely
incompatible. Combining httpd 2.0 and mod_jk compiled for 2.2 will
result in completely undefined behaviour!
Although most modules compile unchanged from source for 2.0 and 2.2 (so
does mod_jk), the resulting binary only works for the httpd version (2.0
or 2.2) it has been compiled for.
Since there are no 2.0 binaries for download available until now, you
need to compile the module yourself. If you've got apxs/apxs2 on your
system (a version that came with your httpd 2.0) and a gcc compiler,
compiling mod_jk is *very* simple. Just "./configure
--with-apxs=/path/to/apxs" and then "make".
Regards,
Rainer
Peter.Henningsen@wcenter.de wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I guess everyone has heard about the security issue that was fixed in
> mod_jk recently.
>
> I did install the new version, but since then I see a lot of log entries
> from mod_jk like :
>
> jk_uri_worker_map.c (614)]: In jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker,
> wrong parameters
>
> The Apache Log shows entries like
> ...
> Destroying config 0x800b5c10
> Creating new config (0x800d8060) for (null)
> ...
>
> The maschines seem to work fine, but I suspect, I have installed a wrong
> connector version.
>
> My Tomcat 5.5 and Apache2.0 are on a MACHTYPE=i686-suse-linux
>
> I installed mod_jk-1.2.21-apache-2.2.x-linux-i686.so as binary as there
> is no linux binary for apache2.0.
> I have not found decisive information about what version to use in the
> documentation.
>
> So here is my question at last: Should the mod_jk apache2.2 binary
support
> also apache 2.0 (and the errors are caused by something else)?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Peter Henningsen
> Senior Consultant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Should mod_jk-1.2.21-apache-2.2.x-linux-i686 support Apache2.0
as well?
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
Hello,
module binaries for Apache httpd 2.0 and 2.2 are definitely
incompatible. Combining httpd 2.0 and mod_jk compiled for 2.2 will
result in completely undefined behaviour!
Although most modules compile unchanged from source for 2.0 and 2.2 (so
does mod_jk), the resulting binary only works for the httpd version (2.0
or 2.2) it has been compiled for.
Since there are no 2.0 binaries for download available until now, you
need to compile the module yourself. If you've got apxs/apxs2 on your
system (a version that came with your httpd 2.0) and a gcc compiler,
compiling mod_jk is *very* simple. Just "./configure
--with-apxs=/path/to/apxs" and then "make".
Regards,
Rainer
Peter.Henningsen@wcenter.de wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I guess everyone has heard about the security issue that was fixed in
> mod_jk recently.
>
> I did install the new version, but since then I see a lot of log entries
> from mod_jk like :
>
> jk_uri_worker_map.c (614)]: In jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker,
> wrong parameters
>
> The Apache Log shows entries like
> ...
> Destroying config 0x800b5c10
> Creating new config (0x800d8060) for (null)
> ...
>
> The maschines seem to work fine, but I suspect, I have installed a wrong
> connector version.
>
> My Tomcat 5.5 and Apache2.0 are on a MACHTYPE=i686-suse-linux
>
> I installed mod_jk-1.2.21-apache-2.2.x-linux-i686.so as binary as there
> is no linux binary for apache2.0.
> I have not found decisive information about what version to use in the
> documentation.
>
> So here is my question at last: Should the mod_jk apache2.2 binary support
> also apache 2.0 (and the errors are caused by something else)?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Peter Henningsen
> Senior Consultant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org