You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> on 2007/05/31 11:11:52 UTC
Re: buildbot failure in mleisi-suse10.2-x86
Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes:
> buildbot@spamassassin.zones.apache.org wrote:
> > The Buildbot has detected a new failure of mleisi-suse10.2-x86.
> > Full details are available at:
> > http://buildbot.spamassassin.org:8010/mleisi-suse10.2-x86/builds/100
> >
> > Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.spamassassin.org:8010/
> >
> > Buildslave for this Build: mleisi-suse10.2-x86
> >
> > Build Reason:
> > Build Source Stamp: HEAD
> > Blamelist: dos
> >
> > BUILD FAILED: failed test
> >
> > sincerely,
> > -The Buildbot
>
> Not sure what's causing this... I haven't touched trunk.
The two mleisi* buildbots seem to have a tendency to fail their
tests for unrelated reasons, I think. I've seen other cases
where they've given filesystem-related errors during the "make test"
phase...
--j.
> t/spamd_parallel............ Not found: endsinnums = TEST_ENDSNUMS
> # Failed test 16 in t/SATest.pm at line 633
> Not found: noreal = TEST_NOREALNAME
> # Failed test 17 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 fail #2
> Not found: flag = X-Spam-Flag: YES
> # Failed test 18 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 fail #3
> Not found: stars = X-Spam-Level: **********
> # Failed test 19 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 fail #4
> Not found: status = X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=
> # Failed test 20 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 fail #5
> Output can be examined in: log/d.spamd_parallel/out.1
> log/d.spamd_parallel/out.15
> FAILED tests 16-20
> Failed 5/20 tests, 75.00% okay
Re: buildbot failure in mleisi-suse10.2-x86
Posted by Matthias Leisi <ma...@leisi.net>.
>> > Buildslave for this Build: mleisi-suse10.2-x86
>> >
>> > Build Reason:
>> > Build Source Stamp: HEAD
>> > Blamelist: dos
>> >
>> > BUILD FAILED: failed test
>> >
>> > sincerely,
>> > -The Buildbot
>>
>> Not sure what's causing this... I haven't touched trunk.
>
> The two mleisi* buildbots seem to have a tendency to fail their
> tests for unrelated reasons, I think. I've seen other cases
> where they've given filesystem-related errors during the "make test"
> phase...
It's actually only the -x86, but not the -x86_64. The -x86 has connection
problems (recurring packet losses of up to 90% for prolonged periods of
time, a separate sad story), so I took it down for the time being (it came
up again inadvertently after a reboot yesterday).
-x86 is now disabled again (and permanently until the connection problems
are resolved, which may involve switching from DSL to cable *sigh*).
Sorry for the confusion,
-- Matthias
>
> --j.
>
>> t/spamd_parallel............ Not found: endsinnums = TEST_ENDSNUMS
>> # Failed test 16 in t/SATest.pm at line 633
>> Not found: noreal = TEST_NOREALNAME
>> # Failed test 17 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 fail #2
>> Not found: flag = X-Spam-Flag: YES
>> # Failed test 18 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 fail #3
>> Not found: stars = X-Spam-Level: **********
>> # Failed test 19 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 fail #4
>> Not found: status = X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=
>> # Failed test 20 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 fail #5
>> Output can be examined in: log/d.spamd_parallel/out.1
>> log/d.spamd_parallel/out.15
>> FAILED tests 16-20
>> Failed 5/20 tests, 75.00% okay
>
>