You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> on 2005/08/02 20:50:52 UTC
myfaces_ext.tld to tomahawk.tld
Now that we are adjusting names to tomahawk, should'nt also the
myfaces_ext.tld file change to tomahawk.tld?
Regards,
Bruno
Re: myfaces_ext.tld to tomahawk.tld
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
We could of course just keep in the old tld file, as we have done once
before...
regards,
Martin
On 8/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hadn't thought about that part ... that might cause a lot of
> headaches, especially with users who don't realize its changed. I'm
> changing my vote to 0 for Matthias' idea but still +1 for changing the
> name as Bruno suggested.
>
> On 8/3/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > another (reluctant) +1
> >
> > cause all users have to change their JSP-files with that, just changing
> the
> > prefix doesn't do any harm.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > On 8/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1 for Matthias' suggestion as well
> > >
> > > On 8/3/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > +1 to the 'also' :-) I think we should change to tomahawk wherever
> it
> > > > is needed...
> > > >
> > > > Bruno
> > > >
> > > > 2005/8/3, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > also
> > > > >
> > > > > <uri> http://myfaces.apache.org/extensions</uri>
> > > > >
> > > > > to
> > > > >
> > > > > http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk ?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/3/05, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 8/2/05, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > I was thinking that also. +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 8/2/05, Bruno Aranda < brunoaranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Now that we are adjusting names to tomahawk, should'nt also
> the
> > > > > > > > myfaces_ext.tld file change to tomahawk.tld?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Bruno
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: myfaces_ext.tld to tomahawk.tld
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
Hadn't thought about that part ... that might cause a lot of
headaches, especially with users who don't realize its changed. I'm
changing my vote to 0 for Matthias' idea but still +1 for changing the
name as Bruno suggested.
On 8/3/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> another (reluctant) +1
>
> cause all users have to change their JSP-files with that, just changing the
> prefix doesn't do any harm.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
> On 8/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 for Matthias' suggestion as well
> >
> > On 8/3/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1 to the 'also' :-) I think we should change to tomahawk wherever it
> > > is needed...
> > >
> > > Bruno
> > >
> > > 2005/8/3, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > also
> > > >
> > > > <uri> http://myfaces.apache.org/extensions</uri>
> > > >
> > > > to
> > > >
> > > > http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 8/3/05, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/2/05, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I was thinking that also. +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 8/2/05, Bruno Aranda < brunoaranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Now that we are adjusting names to tomahawk, should'nt also the
> > > > > > > myfaces_ext.tld file change to tomahawk.tld?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bruno
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: myfaces_ext.tld to tomahawk.tld
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
I'll work on this Sunday or Monday. I'll be offline this weekend.
sean
On 8/5/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> of course... if you do a replace via ant, will be working just as well ;)
>
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 8/4/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What would we need XSLT or codegen for again? Don't we just need to
> > change the URI for the new TLD on the fly using Ant?
> >
> > sean
> >
> >
> > On 8/4/05, Martin Marinschek < martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > right ;)
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/4/05, Mike Kienenberger <mkienenb@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > > Codegen :) Why fight it?
> > > >
> > > > On 8/4/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Yes, this is a very good thing to do...
> > > > >
> > > > > how do you want to do this? XSLT transformation?
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/4/05, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > You know, of course, that the prefix you mention in the TLD is
> > > mostly
> > > > > > > irrelevant, right? It's up to the page to declare what prefix
> it is
> > > > > > > actually going to use. The one in the TLD is merely a
> recommended
> > > > > > > default.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes I know this. But its nice for the recommended defaults to be
> > > > > meaningful.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > The important issue is the tag library URI ... you will
> definitely
> > > > > > > want to maintain a (deprecated) version of the old TLD that
> contains
> > > > > > > this URI for some reasonable period of time. And, from a
> mechanical
> > > > > > > viewpoint, you'll want the build process to generate both
> versions
> > > > > > > from some common source, so you don't have to worry about
> changing
> > > two
> > > > > > > TLDs every time you add a new tag or attribute.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Excellent idea concerning the build. That was a problem the last
> time
> > > > > > we maintained two sets of TLDs like this. Nobody every updated
> the
> > > > > > old one. Lets just keep the single TLD in SVN and auto-generate
> the
> > > > > > legacy one in the build.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for the suggestion.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Craig
> > > > > >
> > > > > > sean
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: myfaces_ext.tld to tomahawk.tld
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
of course... if you do a replace via ant, will be working just as well ;)
regards,
Martin
On 8/4/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What would we need XSLT or codegen for again? Don't we just need to
> change the URI for the new TLD on the fly using Ant?
>
> sean
>
>
> On 8/4/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > right ;)
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > On 8/4/05, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Codegen :) Why fight it?
> > >
> > > On 8/4/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Yes, this is a very good thing to do...
> > > >
> > > > how do you want to do this? XSLT transformation?
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 8/4/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > You know, of course, that the prefix you mention in the TLD is
> > mostly
> > > > > > irrelevant, right? It's up to the page to declare what prefix it
> is
> > > > > > actually going to use. The one in the TLD is merely a
> recommended
> > > > > > default.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes I know this. But its nice for the recommended defaults to be
> > > > meaningful.
> > > > >
> > > > > > The important issue is the tag library URI ... you will
> definitely
> > > > > > want to maintain a (deprecated) version of the old TLD that
> contains
> > > > > > this URI for some reasonable period of time. And, from a
> mechanical
> > > > > > viewpoint, you'll want the build process to generate both
> versions
> > > > > > from some common source, so you don't have to worry about
> changing
> > two
> > > > > > TLDs every time you add a new tag or attribute.
> > > > >
> > > > > Excellent idea concerning the build. That was a problem the last
> time
> > > > > we maintained two sets of TLDs like this. Nobody every updated the
> > > > > old one. Lets just keep the single TLD in SVN and auto-generate
> the
> > > > > legacy one in the build.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the suggestion.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Craig
> > > > >
> > > > > sean
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: myfaces_ext.tld to tomahawk.tld
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
What would we need XSLT or codegen for again? Don't we just need to
change the URI for the new TLD on the fly using Ant?
sean
On 8/4/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> right ;)
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
> On 8/4/05, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Codegen :) Why fight it?
> >
> > On 8/4/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yes, this is a very good thing to do...
> > >
> > > how do you want to do this? XSLT transformation?
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/4/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > You know, of course, that the prefix you mention in the TLD is
> mostly
> > > > > irrelevant, right? It's up to the page to declare what prefix it is
> > > > > actually going to use. The one in the TLD is merely a recommended
> > > > > default.
> > > >
> > > > Yes I know this. But its nice for the recommended defaults to be
> > > meaningful.
> > > >
> > > > > The important issue is the tag library URI ... you will definitely
> > > > > want to maintain a (deprecated) version of the old TLD that contains
> > > > > this URI for some reasonable period of time. And, from a mechanical
> > > > > viewpoint, you'll want the build process to generate both versions
> > > > > from some common source, so you don't have to worry about changing
> two
> > > > > TLDs every time you add a new tag or attribute.
> > > >
> > > > Excellent idea concerning the build. That was a problem the last time
> > > > we maintained two sets of TLDs like this. Nobody every updated the
> > > > old one. Lets just keep the single TLD in SVN and auto-generate the
> > > > legacy one in the build.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the suggestion.
> > > >
> > > > > Craig
> > > >
> > > > sean
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: myfaces_ext.tld to tomahawk.tld
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
right ;)
regards,
Martin
On 8/4/05, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Codegen :) Why fight it?
>
> On 8/4/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes, this is a very good thing to do...
> >
> > how do you want to do this? XSLT transformation?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > On 8/4/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > You know, of course, that the prefix you mention in the TLD is
> mostly
> > > > irrelevant, right? It's up to the page to declare what prefix it is
> > > > actually going to use. The one in the TLD is merely a recommended
> > > > default.
> > >
> > > Yes I know this. But its nice for the recommended defaults to be
> > meaningful.
> > >
> > > > The important issue is the tag library URI ... you will definitely
> > > > want to maintain a (deprecated) version of the old TLD that contains
> > > > this URI for some reasonable period of time. And, from a mechanical
> > > > viewpoint, you'll want the build process to generate both versions
> > > > from some common source, so you don't have to worry about changing
> two
> > > > TLDs every time you add a new tag or attribute.
> > >
> > > Excellent idea concerning the build. That was a problem the last time
> > > we maintained two sets of TLDs like this. Nobody every updated the
> > > old one. Lets just keep the single TLD in SVN and auto-generate the
> > > legacy one in the build.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the suggestion.
> > >
> > > > Craig
> > >
> > > sean
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: myfaces_ext.tld to tomahawk.tld
Posted by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>.
Codegen :) Why fight it?
On 8/4/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, this is a very good thing to do...
>
> how do you want to do this? XSLT transformation?
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
> On 8/4/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > You know, of course, that the prefix you mention in the TLD is mostly
> > > irrelevant, right? It's up to the page to declare what prefix it is
> > > actually going to use. The one in the TLD is merely a recommended
> > > default.
> >
> > Yes I know this. But its nice for the recommended defaults to be
> meaningful.
> >
> > > The important issue is the tag library URI ... you will definitely
> > > want to maintain a (deprecated) version of the old TLD that contains
> > > this URI for some reasonable period of time. And, from a mechanical
> > > viewpoint, you'll want the build process to generate both versions
> > > from some common source, so you don't have to worry about changing two
> > > TLDs every time you add a new tag or attribute.
> >
> > Excellent idea concerning the build. That was a problem the last time
> > we maintained two sets of TLDs like this. Nobody every updated the
> > old one. Lets just keep the single TLD in SVN and auto-generate the
> > legacy one in the build.
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestion.
> >
> > > Craig
> >
> > sean
> >
>
>
Re: myfaces_ext.tld to tomahawk.tld
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Yes, this is a very good thing to do...
how do you want to do this? XSLT transformation?
regards,
Martin
On 8/4/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > You know, of course, that the prefix you mention in the TLD is mostly
> > irrelevant, right? It's up to the page to declare what prefix it is
> > actually going to use. The one in the TLD is merely a recommended
> > default.
>
> Yes I know this. But its nice for the recommended defaults to be
> meaningful.
>
> > The important issue is the tag library URI ... you will definitely
> > want to maintain a (deprecated) version of the old TLD that contains
> > this URI for some reasonable period of time. And, from a mechanical
> > viewpoint, you'll want the build process to generate both versions
> > from some common source, so you don't have to worry about changing two
> > TLDs every time you add a new tag or attribute.
>
> Excellent idea concerning the build. That was a problem the last time
> we maintained two sets of TLDs like this. Nobody every updated the
> old one. Lets just keep the single TLD in SVN and auto-generate the
> legacy one in the build.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion.
>
> > Craig
>
> sean
>
Re: myfaces_ext.tld to tomahawk.tld
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
> You know, of course, that the prefix you mention in the TLD is mostly
> irrelevant, right? It's up to the page to declare what prefix it is
> actually going to use. The one in the TLD is merely a recommended
> default.
Yes I know this. But its nice for the recommended defaults to be meaningful.
> The important issue is the tag library URI ... you will definitely
> want to maintain a (deprecated) version of the old TLD that contains
> this URI for some reasonable period of time. And, from a mechanical
> viewpoint, you'll want the build process to generate both versions
> from some common source, so you don't have to worry about changing two
> TLDs every time you add a new tag or attribute.
Excellent idea concerning the build. That was a problem the last time
we maintained two sets of TLDs like this. Nobody every updated the
old one. Lets just keep the single TLD in SVN and auto-generate the
legacy one in the build.
Thanks for the suggestion.
> Craig
sean
Re: myfaces_ext.tld to tomahawk.tld
Posted by Craig McClanahan <cr...@gmail.com>.
On 8/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How about two TLD files (like we had for SF): the original one will
> have the extensions URI and have 'x'. The new one will have tomahawk
> and 't'. Sound good?
You know, of course, that the prefix you mention in the TLD is mostly
irrelevant, right? It's up to the page to declare what prefix it is
actually going to use. The one in the TLD is merely a recommended
default.
The important issue is the tag library URI ... you will definitely
want to maintain a (deprecated) version of the old TLD that contains
this URI for some reasonable period of time. And, from a mechanical
viewpoint, you'll want the build process to generate both versions
from some common source, so you don't have to worry about changing two
TLDs every time you add a new tag or attribute.
Craig
Re: myfaces_ext.tld to tomahawk.tld
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
How about two TLD files (like we had for SF): the original one will
have the extensions URI and have 'x'. The new one will have tomahawk
and 't'. Sound good?
On 8/3/05, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 also for renaming the uri - should be enough if it's mentioned in the
> release notes - let's not do things by halves
>
>
> On 8/3/05, Matthias Wessendorf < mwessendorf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > well we could provide the old an the new tld... ;)
> >
> > like we did in the past (sf -> a.o)
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > On 8/3/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > another (reluctant) +1
> > >
> > > cause all users have to change their JSP-files with that, just changing
> the
> > > prefix doesn't do any harm.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/3/05, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > +1 for Matthias' suggestion as well
> > > >
> > > > On 8/3/05, Bruno Aranda < brunoaranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > +1 to the 'also' :-) I think we should change to tomahawk wherever
> it
> > > > > is needed...
> > > > >
> > > > > Bruno
> > > > >
> > > > > 2005/8/3, Matthias Wessendorf < mwessendorf@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > also
> > > > > >
> > > > > > <uri> http://myfaces.apache.org/extensions </uri>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > to
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 8/3/05, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 8/2/05, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I was thinking that also. +1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 8/2/05, Bruno Aranda < brunoaranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Now that we are adjusting names to tomahawk, should'nt also
> the
> > > > > > > > > myfaces_ext.tld file change to tomahawk.tld?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Bruno
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
>
>
Re: myfaces_ext.tld to tomahawk.tld
Posted by Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>.
+1 also for renaming the uri - should be enough if it's mentioned in the
release notes - let's not do things by halves
On 8/3/05, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> well we could provide the old an the new tld... ;)
>
> like we did in the past (sf -> a.o)
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 8/3/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > another (reluctant) +1
> >
> > cause all users have to change their JSP-files with that, just changing
> the
> > prefix doesn't do any harm.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > On 8/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1 for Matthias' suggestion as well
> > >
> > > On 8/3/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > +1 to the 'also' :-) I think we should change to tomahawk wherever
> it
> > > > is needed...
> > > >
> > > > Bruno
> > > >
> > > > 2005/8/3, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > also
> > > > >
> > > > > <uri> http://myfaces.apache.org/extensions</uri>
> > > > >
> > > > > to
> > > > >
> > > > > http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk ?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/3/05, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 8/2/05, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > I was thinking that also. +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 8/2/05, Bruno Aranda < brunoaranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Now that we are adjusting names to tomahawk, should'nt also
> the
> > > > > > > > myfaces_ext.tld file change to tomahawk.tld?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Bruno
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
Re: myfaces_ext.tld to tomahawk.tld
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com>.
well we could provide the old an the new tld... ;)
like we did in the past (sf -> a.o)
-Matthias
On 8/3/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> another (reluctant) +1
>
> cause all users have to change their JSP-files with that, just changing the
> prefix doesn't do any harm.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
> On 8/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 for Matthias' suggestion as well
> >
> > On 8/3/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1 to the 'also' :-) I think we should change to tomahawk wherever it
> > > is needed...
> > >
> > > Bruno
> > >
> > > 2005/8/3, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > also
> > > >
> > > > <uri> http://myfaces.apache.org/extensions</uri>
> > > >
> > > > to
> > > >
> > > > http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 8/3/05, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/2/05, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I was thinking that also. +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 8/2/05, Bruno Aranda < brunoaranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Now that we are adjusting names to tomahawk, should'nt also the
> > > > > > > myfaces_ext.tld file change to tomahawk.tld?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bruno
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
Re: myfaces_ext.tld to tomahawk.tld
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
another (reluctant) +1
cause all users have to change their JSP-files with that, just changing the
prefix doesn't do any harm.
regards,
Martin
On 8/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 for Matthias' suggestion as well
>
> On 8/3/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 to the 'also' :-) I think we should change to tomahawk wherever it
> > is needed...
> >
> > Bruno
> >
> > 2005/8/3, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com>:
> > > also
> > >
> > > <uri>http://myfaces.apache.org/extensions</uri>
> > >
> > > to
> > >
> > > http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/3/05, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On 8/2/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I was thinking that also. +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/2/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Now that we are adjusting names to tomahawk, should'nt also the
> > > > > > myfaces_ext.tld file change to tomahawk.tld?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bruno
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> >
>
Re: myfaces_ext.tld to tomahawk.tld
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
+1 for Matthias' suggestion as well
On 8/3/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 to the 'also' :-) I think we should change to tomahawk wherever it
> is needed...
>
> Bruno
>
> 2005/8/3, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com>:
> > also
> >
> > <uri>http://myfaces.apache.org/extensions</uri>
> >
> > to
> >
> > http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/3/05, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On 8/2/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I was thinking that also. +1
> > > >
> > > > On 8/2/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Now that we are adjusting names to tomahawk, should'nt also the
> > > > > myfaces_ext.tld file change to tomahawk.tld?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Bruno
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
>
Re: myfaces_ext.tld to tomahawk.tld
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
+1 to the 'also' :-) I think we should change to tomahawk wherever it
is needed...
Bruno
2005/8/3, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com>:
> also
>
> <uri>http://myfaces.apache.org/extensions</uri>
>
> to
>
> http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk ?
>
>
>
>
> On 8/3/05, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On 8/2/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I was thinking that also. +1
> > >
> > > On 8/2/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Now that we are adjusting names to tomahawk, should'nt also the
> > > > myfaces_ext.tld file change to tomahawk.tld?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Bruno
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
Re: myfaces_ext.tld to tomahawk.tld
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com>.
also
<uri>http://myfaces.apache.org/extensions</uri>
to
http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk ?
On 8/3/05, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On 8/2/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I was thinking that also. +1
> >
> > On 8/2/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Now that we are adjusting names to tomahawk, should'nt also the
> > > myfaces_ext.tld file change to tomahawk.tld?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Bruno
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
Re: myfaces_ext.tld to tomahawk.tld
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 8/2/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was thinking that also. +1
>
> On 8/2/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Now that we are adjusting names to tomahawk, should'nt also the
> > myfaces_ext.tld file change to tomahawk.tld?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Bruno
> >
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
Re: myfaces_ext.tld to tomahawk.tld
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
I was thinking that also. +1
On 8/2/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now that we are adjusting names to tomahawk, should'nt also the
> myfaces_ext.tld file change to tomahawk.tld?
>
> Regards,
>
> Bruno
>