You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Kenneth Liu (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org> on 2007/03/28 16:09:37 UTC

[jira] Commented: (MRELEASE-116) Wrong SCM info put by the release plugin for modules

    [ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_91223 ] 

Kenneth Liu commented on MRELEASE-116:
--------------------------------------

Has there been any work on this issue?  Right now I am manually fixing the <scm> element of every tagged release after release:prepare.

> Wrong SCM info put by the release plugin for modules
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MRELEASE-116
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-116
>             Project: Maven 2.x Release Plugin
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: scm
>    Affects Versions: 2.0-beta-4
>         Environment: Sun JDK 1.5, M2 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT (2006-01-30), Subversion SCM
>            Reporter: Arik Kfir
>         Assigned To: Jason van Zyl
>             Fix For: 2.0-beta-5
>
>         Attachments: patch.txt, patch.txt
>
>
> Hi,
> I have a project with several modules in it. The entire project is
> stored in one SVN repository, in the following layout:
> myproject
>   |
>   +-- module A
>   |
>   +-- module B
>   |
>   +-- .....
> The root pom has a <scm> url like "http://svn.myserver/.../trunk/", and each sub module also has its own <scm> tag with a url such as "http://svn.myserver/.../trunk/moduleA", etc.
> When running "release:prepare", the URL encoded back into the modules' POMs (the back-to-trunk pom, not the released one) is the same URL as the root POM, rather than the original module's SCM url. So module A's <scm> urls would be "http://svn.myserver/.../trunk/" without the "moduleA" directory appended to it (as it was before releasing).
> Carlos has pointed out to me that the best practice for this use case is not specifying the <scm> tag for the modules' POMs at all. He did, however, also noted that it's still a bug - hence this JIRA ;-)
> Cheers.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira