Re: Documentation Format (was Re: Help wanted: more qualified developers)

[Martin Stricker <sh...@gmx.de>]

Kelly Campbell wrote:
> 
> What's wrong with Stylebook? Personally, I prefer Docbook. It's well
> documented, used for many other documentation projects, and has alot
> of resources going for it. But we've already got most of the websites
> in stylebook, so I'm just wondering if it makes sense to do things two
> different ways? I know stylebook is more web-oriented, but we
> shouldn't have to maintain duplicate sets of documents just to have a
> printable version.

You can easily print web pages. Most browsers even have a print button.
;-))

Please keep the documentation format as simple as possible! I want to be
able to read it on a linux console (text only, no graphical user
interface).

BTW: The higher the learning curve for writing xml.apache.org
documentation is the lower is the chance I'll write some...

Best regards,
Martin Stricker

-- 
Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
Star Trek Rollenspiel: http://www.uss-republic.de/
Webmaster-Forum: http://www.masterportal24.com/cgi-bin/YaBB.cgi
Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter.li.org/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail:     webmaster@xml.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail:          general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org