You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@cxf.apache.org by "Alexander Shvid (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/11/01 04:40:35 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (CXF-6078) AnnotationUtils.getAnnotatedMethod for abstract classes non inherent from interface

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Alexander Shvid updated CXF-6078:
---------------------------------
    Attachment: NameServiceImpl.java
                NameService.java
                AnnotationUtilsTest.java
                AbstractNameServiceImpl.java

JUnit test

> AnnotationUtils.getAnnotatedMethod for abstract classes non inherent from interface
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-6078
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6078
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JAX-RS
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.13
>            Reporter: Alexander Shvid
>         Attachments: AbstractNameServiceImpl.java, AnnotationUtilsTest.java, NameService.java, NameServiceImpl.java
>
>
> I created the special junit test to demonstrate this bug.
> Suppose we have NameService with annotated methods: 'get' and 'set'.
> NameServiceImpl that implements NameService and only 'get' method.
> AbstractNameServiceImpl that implements 'set' method. 
> NameServiceImpl extends AbstractNameServiceImpl.
> For this case AnnotationUtils.getAnnotatedMethod returns wrond annotatedMethod for 'set'. It is actually same method as requested one, not a interface 'set' method.
> m = public javax.ws.rs.core.Response NameServiceImpl.get(java.lang.String)
> a = public abstract javax.ws.rs.core.Response NameService.get(java.lang.String)
> m = public javax.ws.rs.core.Response AbstractNameServiceImpl.set(java.lang.String)
> a = public javax.ws.rs.core.Response AbstractNameServiceImpl.set(java.lang.String)
> JDK1.7.0_51
> It happens because AnnotationUtils.getAnnotatedMethod has only single argument Method, that is only from super class AbstractNameServiceImpl and does not check hierarchy of the NameServiceImpl itself.
> AnnotationUtils.getAnnotatedMethod needs additional Class<?> serviceClass argument for this purpose.
> It actually affects ResourceUtils.createClassResourceInfo
> that calls AnnotationUtils.getAnnotatedMethod to detect annotated method in the loop
>     private static void evaluateResourceClass(ClassResourceInfo cri, boolean enableStatic) {
>         MethodDispatcher md = new MethodDispatcher();
>         for (Method m : cri.getServiceClass().getMethods()) {
>             
>             Method annotatedMethod = AnnotationUtils.getAnnotatedMethod(m);
> It knows about ServiceClass, but does not use this information to walk in classes hierarchy.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)