You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Scott Blum (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/05/23 20:11:12 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9152) Change the default of facet.distrib.mco from false to true

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15296998#comment-15296998 ] 

Scott Blum commented on SOLR-9152:
----------------------------------

Why is this even an option?  I don't understand why you'd ever need the distributed request to have mincount=0 when the main request has mincount=1.

> Change the default of facet.distrib.mco from false to true
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-9152
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9152
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Dennis Gove
>            Priority: Minor
>
> SOLR-8988 added a new query option facet.distrib.mco which when set to true would allow the use of facet.mincount=1 in cloud mode. The previous behavior, and current default, is that facet.mincount=0 when in cloud mode. 
> h3. What exactly would be changed?
> The default of facet.distrib.mco=false would be changed to facet.distrib.mco=true.
> h3. When is this option effective?
> From the documentation,
> {code}
> /**
>  * If we are returning facet field counts, are sorting those facets by their count, and the minimum count to return is &gt; 0,
>  * then allow the use of facet.mincount = 1 in cloud mode. To enable this use facet.distrib.mco=true.
>  *
>  * i.e. If the following three conditions are met in cloud mode: facet.sort=count, facet.limit &gt; 0, facet.mincount &gt; 0.
>  * Then use facet.mincount=1.
>  *
>  * Previously and by default facet.mincount will be explicitly set to 0 when in cloud mode for this condition.
>  * In SOLR-8599 and SOLR-8988, significant performance increase has been seen when enabling this optimization.
>  *
>  * Note: enabling this flag has no effect when the conditions above are not met. For those other cases the default behavior is sufficient.
>  */
> {code}
> h3. What is the result of turning this option on?
> When facet.distrib.mco=true is used, and the conditions above are met, then when Solr is sending requests off to the various shards it will include facet.mincount=1. The result of this is that only terms with a count > 0 will be considered when processing the request for that shard. This can result in a significant performance gain when the field has high cardinality and the matching docset is relatively small because terms with 0 matches will not be considered. 
> As shown in SOLR-8988, the runtime of a single query was reduced from 20 seconds to less than 1 second.
> h3. Can this change result in worse performance?
> The current thinking is no, worse performance won't be experienced even under non-optimal scenarios. From the comments in SOLR-8988, 
> {quote}
> Consider you asked for up to 10 terms from shardA with mincount=1 but you received only 5 terms back. In this case you know, definitively, that a term seen in the response from shardB but not in the response from shardA could have at most a count of 0 in shardA. If it had any other count in shardA then it would have been returned in the response from shardA.
> Also, if you asked for up to 10 terms from shardA with mincount=1 and you get back a response with 10 terms having a count >= 1 then the response is identical to the one you'd have received if mincount=0. 
> Because of this, there isn't a scenario where the response would result in more work than would have been required if mincount=0. For this reason, the decrease in required work when mincount=1 is *always* either a moot point or a net win.
> {quote}
> The belief here is that it is safe to change the default of facet.distrib.mco such that facet.mincount=1 will be used when appropriate. The overall performance gain can be significant and there is no seen performance cost.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org