You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@distributedlog.apache.org by Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> on 2016/09/10 19:32:53 UTC
Re: Repackaging the package namespace
Any suggestions from mentors for the first release?
- Sijie
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the namespace to under
> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from mentors?
>
> - Sijie
>
Re: Repackaging the package namespace
Posted by Sijie Guo <si...@twitter.com.INVALID>.
Sorry, I didn't get the chance to take a look your pull request. There is
also a pull request (updating the libthrift version in core) which will
touch quite bunch of files. I am trying to figure out a plan for
accommodate these two changes. I will try to comment on your pull request.
- Sijie
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Any updates on this? Can we get this change in ASAP? so I can rebase my
> branches to the new package namespace. Appreciate any updates.
>
> - KN
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Khurrum,
> >
> > thank your so much for making this change. I will try to take a look and
> > get back to you soon.
> >
> > - Sijie
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Forgot the pull request -
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/41
> > >
> > > - KN
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Khurrum Nasim <
> khurrumnasimm@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I just sent a pull request - repacked the package from
> > > > com.twitter.distributedlog to org.apache.distributedlog.
> > > >
> > > > (basically just renamed files and sed/replace the package name)
> > > >
> > > > Let me know if it is okay.
> > > >
> > > > - KN
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Khurrum, I don't think anyone is working on this now. Feel free to
> > pick
> > > it
> > > >> up.
> > > >>
> > > >> - Sijie
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Khurrum Nasim <
> > khurrumnasimm@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Is anyone working on repackaging? If no, can I pick this up?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > - KN
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Khurrum Nasim <
> > > >> khurrumnasimm@gmail.com>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > +1
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić <
> sslavic@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira <
> > fpj@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >> > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> > It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation
> > says:
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > On Repackaging
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is
> > repackaged
> > > >> under
> > > >> > >> the
> > > >> > >> > Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator
> > > namespace.
> > > >> For
> > > >> > >> > example, Java source might be repackaged to
> org.apache.foo.Bar
> > > or a
> > > >> > DTD
> > > >> > >> to
> > > >> > >> > http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar.
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need
> to
> > > >> > consider
> > > >> > >> > carefully how they will approach this transition.
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > My suggestion is to repackage before the first release,
> though.
> > > >> This
> > > >> > way
> > > >> > >> > applications written against the early release will have the
> > > right
> > > >> > >> > namespace already.
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > -Flavio
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > Any suggestions from mentors for the first release?
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > - Sijie
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <
> > sijie@apache.org>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > >> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the
> > namespace
> > > to
> > > >> > >> under
> > > >> > >> > >> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from
> > > mentors?
> > > >> > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> > >> - Sijie
> > > >> > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Repackaging the package namespace
Posted by Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>.
Any updates on this? Can we get this change in ASAP? so I can rebase my
branches to the new package namespace. Appreciate any updates.
- KN
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> Khurrum,
>
> thank your so much for making this change. I will try to take a look and
> get back to you soon.
>
> - Sijie
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Forgot the pull request -
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/41
> >
> > - KN
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I just sent a pull request - repacked the package from
> > > com.twitter.distributedlog to org.apache.distributedlog.
> > >
> > > (basically just renamed files and sed/replace the package name)
> > >
> > > Let me know if it is okay.
> > >
> > > - KN
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Khurrum, I don't think anyone is working on this now. Feel free to
> pick
> > it
> > >> up.
> > >>
> > >> - Sijie
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Khurrum Nasim <
> khurrumnasimm@gmail.com
> > >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Is anyone working on repackaging? If no, can I pick this up?
> > >> >
> > >> > - KN
> > >> >
> > >> > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Khurrum Nasim <
> > >> khurrumnasimm@gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > +1
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira <
> fpj@apache.org
> > >
> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation
> says:
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > On Repackaging
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is
> repackaged
> > >> under
> > >> > >> the
> > >> > >> > Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator
> > namespace.
> > >> For
> > >> > >> > example, Java source might be repackaged to org.apache.foo.Bar
> > or a
> > >> > DTD
> > >> > >> to
> > >> > >> > http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar.
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need to
> > >> > consider
> > >> > >> > carefully how they will approach this transition.
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > My suggestion is to repackage before the first release, though.
> > >> This
> > >> > way
> > >> > >> > applications written against the early release will have the
> > right
> > >> > >> > namespace already.
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > -Flavio
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > > On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > Any suggestions from mentors for the first release?
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > - Sijie
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <
> sijie@apache.org>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > >> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the
> namespace
> > to
> > >> > >> under
> > >> > >> > >> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from
> > mentors?
> > >> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >> - Sijie
> > >> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Repackaging the package namespace
Posted by Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>.
Khurrum,
thank your so much for making this change. I will try to take a look and
get back to you soon.
- Sijie
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Forgot the pull request -
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/41
>
> - KN
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I just sent a pull request - repacked the package from
> > com.twitter.distributedlog to org.apache.distributedlog.
> >
> > (basically just renamed files and sed/replace the package name)
> >
> > Let me know if it is okay.
> >
> > - KN
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Khurrum, I don't think anyone is working on this now. Feel free to pick
> it
> >> up.
> >>
> >> - Sijie
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Khurrum Nasim <khurrumnasimm@gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Is anyone working on repackaging? If no, can I pick this up?
> >> >
> >> > - KN
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Khurrum Nasim <
> >> khurrumnasimm@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > +1
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fpj@apache.org
> >
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation says:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > On Repackaging
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is repackaged
> >> under
> >> > >> the
> >> > >> > Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator
> namespace.
> >> For
> >> > >> > example, Java source might be repackaged to org.apache.foo.Bar
> or a
> >> > DTD
> >> > >> to
> >> > >> > http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need to
> >> > consider
> >> > >> > carefully how they will approach this transition.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > My suggestion is to repackage before the first release, though.
> >> This
> >> > way
> >> > >> > applications written against the early release will have the
> right
> >> > >> > namespace already.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > -Flavio
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > > On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Any suggestions from mentors for the first release?
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > - Sijie
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the namespace
> to
> >> > >> under
> >> > >> > >> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from
> mentors?
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> - Sijie
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Repackaging the package namespace
Posted by Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>.
Forgot the pull request -
https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/41
- KN
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I just sent a pull request - repacked the package from
> com.twitter.distributedlog to org.apache.distributedlog.
>
> (basically just renamed files and sed/replace the package name)
>
> Let me know if it is okay.
>
> - KN
>
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Khurrum, I don't think anyone is working on this now. Feel free to pick it
>> up.
>>
>> - Sijie
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Is anyone working on repackaging? If no, can I pick this up?
>> >
>> > - KN
>> >
>> > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Khurrum Nasim <
>> khurrumnasimm@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@apache.org>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation says:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Repackaging
>> > >> >
>> > >> > It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is repackaged
>> under
>> > >> the
>> > >> > Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator namespace.
>> For
>> > >> > example, Java source might be repackaged to org.apache.foo.Bar or a
>> > DTD
>> > >> to
>> > >> > http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need to
>> > consider
>> > >> > carefully how they will approach this transition.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > My suggestion is to repackage before the first release, though.
>> This
>> > way
>> > >> > applications written against the early release will have the right
>> > >> > namespace already.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > -Flavio
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Any suggestions from mentors for the first release?
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > - Sijie
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the namespace to
>> > >> under
>> > >> > >> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from mentors?
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> - Sijie
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: Repackaging the package namespace
Posted by Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>.
I just sent a pull request - repacked the package from
com.twitter.distributedlog to org.apache.distributedlog.
(basically just renamed files and sed/replace the package name)
Let me know if it is okay.
- KN
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> Khurrum, I don't think anyone is working on this now. Feel free to pick it
> up.
>
> - Sijie
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Is anyone working on repackaging? If no, can I pick this up?
> >
> > - KN
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Khurrum Nasim <khurrumnasimm@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation says:
> > >> >
> > >> > On Repackaging
> > >> >
> > >> > It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is repackaged
> under
> > >> the
> > >> > Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator namespace.
> For
> > >> > example, Java source might be repackaged to org.apache.foo.Bar or a
> > DTD
> > >> to
> > >> > http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar.
> > >> >
> > >> > Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need to
> > consider
> > >> > carefully how they will approach this transition.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > My suggestion is to repackage before the first release, though. This
> > way
> > >> > applications written against the early release will have the right
> > >> > namespace already.
> > >> >
> > >> > -Flavio
> > >> >
> > >> > > On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Any suggestions from mentors for the first release?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > - Sijie
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the namespace to
> > >> under
> > >> > >> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from mentors?
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> - Sijie
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Repackaging the package namespace
Posted by Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>.
Khurrum, I don't think anyone is working on this now. Feel free to pick it
up.
- Sijie
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Is anyone working on repackaging? If no, can I pick this up?
>
> - KN
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation says:
> >> >
> >> > On Repackaging
> >> >
> >> > It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is repackaged under
> >> the
> >> > Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator namespace. For
> >> > example, Java source might be repackaged to org.apache.foo.Bar or a
> DTD
> >> to
> >> > http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar.
> >> >
> >> > Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need to
> consider
> >> > carefully how they will approach this transition.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > My suggestion is to repackage before the first release, though. This
> way
> >> > applications written against the early release will have the right
> >> > namespace already.
> >> >
> >> > -Flavio
> >> >
> >> > > On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Any suggestions from mentors for the first release?
> >> > >
> >> > > - Sijie
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the namespace to
> >> under
> >> > >> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from mentors?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> - Sijie
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Repackaging the package namespace
Posted by Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>.
Is anyone working on repackaging? If no, can I pick this up?
- KN
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation says:
>> >
>> > On Repackaging
>> >
>> > It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is repackaged under
>> the
>> > Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator namespace. For
>> > example, Java source might be repackaged to org.apache.foo.Bar or a DTD
>> to
>> > http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar.
>> >
>> > Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need to consider
>> > carefully how they will approach this transition.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > My suggestion is to repackage before the first release, though. This way
>> > applications written against the early release will have the right
>> > namespace already.
>> >
>> > -Flavio
>> >
>> > > On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Any suggestions from mentors for the first release?
>> > >
>> > > - Sijie
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the namespace to
>> under
>> > >> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from mentors?
>> > >>
>> > >> - Sijie
>> > >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: Repackaging the package namespace
Posted by Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation says:
> >
> > On Repackaging
> >
> > It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is repackaged under
> the
> > Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator namespace. For
> > example, Java source might be repackaged to org.apache.foo.Bar or a DTD
> to
> > http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar.
> >
> > Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need to consider
> > carefully how they will approach this transition.
> >
> >
> >
> > My suggestion is to repackage before the first release, though. This way
> > applications written against the early release will have the right
> > namespace already.
> >
> > -Flavio
> >
> > > On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Any suggestions from mentors for the first release?
> > >
> > > - Sijie
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the namespace to under
> > >> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from mentors?
> > >>
> > >> - Sijie
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Repackaging the package namespace
Posted by Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>.
+ 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@apache.org> wrote:
> It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation says:
>
> On Repackaging
>
> It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is repackaged under the
> Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator namespace. For
> example, Java source might be repackaged to org.apache.foo.Bar or a DTD to
> http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar.
>
> Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need to consider
> carefully how they will approach this transition.
>
>
>
> My suggestion is to repackage before the first release, though. This way
> applications written against the early release will have the right
> namespace already.
>
> -Flavio
>
> > On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Any suggestions from mentors for the first release?
> >
> > - Sijie
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the namespace to under
> >> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from mentors?
> >>
> >> - Sijie
> >>
>
>
Re: Repackaging the package namespace
Posted by Flavio Junqueira <fp...@apache.org>.
It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation says:
On Repackaging
It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is repackaged under the Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator namespace. For example, Java source might be repackaged to org.apache.foo.Bar or a DTD to http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar.
Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need to consider carefully how they will approach this transition.
My suggestion is to repackage before the first release, though. This way applications written against the early release will have the right namespace already.
-Flavio
> On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Any suggestions from mentors for the first release?
>
> - Sijie
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the namespace to under
>> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from mentors?
>>
>> - Sijie
>>