You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by Joe Toth <jo...@gmail.com> on 2007/12/04 19:23:13 UTC
302 vs. 301 Redirect
When you setRedirect(true), wicket does a 302, temporary, redirect. The
basic rule of thumb in SEO is if you want to pass all authority to a
different page use 301 (permanent).
http://www.seotoday.com/browse.php/category/articles/id/477/index.php
Thoughts on adding something to Wicket to support this functionality?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: 302 vs. 301 Redirect
Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
Exactly, a fully qualified url.. We dont have that so if that is
needed then we have first another problem
2007/12/7, Joe Toth <jo...@gmail.com>:
> I think so...something like
>
> res.setHeader("Location", "http://301redirect.com/ );
> res.setStatus(301);
>
>
> On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 15:43 +0100, Johan Compagner wrote:
> > what is the right way for a permanent redirect in the servlet spec?
> > do it all yourself? Including making the url fully qualified?
> >
> > On Dec 6, 2007 9:49 AM, Joe Toth <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I wasn't suggesting changing the functionality of setRedirect, but
> > > instead maybe adding setPermanentRedirect(true) or another way for
> > > wicket to be able to perform a 301.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 13:43 +0000, Gwyn Evans wrote:
> > > > I think the one thread was "Consistent homepage URL" from 2005Q2 - I
> > > > think the gist was that in the scenario there, it wasn't desirable
> > > > having the redirected URL becoming the one that the search engines
> > > > would always go to.
> > > >
> > > > /Gwyn
> > > >
> > > > On 04/12/2007, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Long long time ago we had discussions about this, i think also
> related
> > > > > to what google expects. I guess what we now have is a result of
> that.
> > > > > But i cant remember what the pros and cons are
> > > > >
> > > > > 2007/12/4, Joe Toth <jo...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > When you setRedirect(true), wicket does a 302, temporary,
> redirect.
> > > The
> > > > > > basic rule of thumb in SEO is if you want to pass all authority to
> a
> > > > > > different page use 301 (permanent).
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > http://www.seotoday.com/browse.php/category/articles/id/477/index.php
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thoughts on adding something to Wicket to support this
> > > functionality?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >
> > >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: 302 vs. 301 Redirect
Posted by Joe Toth <jo...@gmail.com>.
I think so...something like
res.setHeader("Location", "http://301redirect.com/ );
res.setStatus(301);
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 15:43 +0100, Johan Compagner wrote:
> what is the right way for a permanent redirect in the servlet spec?
> do it all yourself? Including making the url fully qualified?
>
> On Dec 6, 2007 9:49 AM, Joe Toth <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I wasn't suggesting changing the functionality of setRedirect, but
> > instead maybe adding setPermanentRedirect(true) or another way for
> > wicket to be able to perform a 301.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 13:43 +0000, Gwyn Evans wrote:
> > > I think the one thread was "Consistent homepage URL" from 2005Q2 - I
> > > think the gist was that in the scenario there, it wasn't desirable
> > > having the redirected URL becoming the one that the search engines
> > > would always go to.
> > >
> > > /Gwyn
> > >
> > > On 04/12/2007, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Long long time ago we had discussions about this, i think also related
> > > > to what google expects. I guess what we now have is a result of that.
> > > > But i cant remember what the pros and cons are
> > > >
> > > > 2007/12/4, Joe Toth <jo...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > When you setRedirect(true), wicket does a 302, temporary, redirect.
> > The
> > > > > basic rule of thumb in SEO is if you want to pass all authority to a
> > > > > different page use 301 (permanent).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > http://www.seotoday.com/browse.php/category/articles/id/477/index.php
> > > > >
> > > > > Thoughts on adding something to Wicket to support this
> > functionality?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: 302 vs. 301 Redirect
Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
what is the right way for a permanent redirect in the servlet spec?
do it all yourself? Including making the url fully qualified?
On Dec 6, 2007 9:49 AM, Joe Toth <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I wasn't suggesting changing the functionality of setRedirect, but
> instead maybe adding setPermanentRedirect(true) or another way for
> wicket to be able to perform a 301.
>
>
> On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 13:43 +0000, Gwyn Evans wrote:
> > I think the one thread was "Consistent homepage URL" from 2005Q2 - I
> > think the gist was that in the scenario there, it wasn't desirable
> > having the redirected URL becoming the one that the search engines
> > would always go to.
> >
> > /Gwyn
> >
> > On 04/12/2007, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Long long time ago we had discussions about this, i think also related
> > > to what google expects. I guess what we now have is a result of that.
> > > But i cant remember what the pros and cons are
> > >
> > > 2007/12/4, Joe Toth <jo...@gmail.com>:
> > > > When you setRedirect(true), wicket does a 302, temporary, redirect.
> The
> > > > basic rule of thumb in SEO is if you want to pass all authority to a
> > > > different page use 301 (permanent).
> > > >
> > > >
> http://www.seotoday.com/browse.php/category/articles/id/477/index.php
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts on adding something to Wicket to support this
> functionality?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Re: 302 vs. 301 Redirect
Posted by Joe Toth <jo...@gmail.com>.
I wasn't suggesting changing the functionality of setRedirect, but
instead maybe adding setPermanentRedirect(true) or another way for
wicket to be able to perform a 301.
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 13:43 +0000, Gwyn Evans wrote:
> I think the one thread was "Consistent homepage URL" from 2005Q2 - I
> think the gist was that in the scenario there, it wasn't desirable
> having the redirected URL becoming the one that the search engines
> would always go to.
>
> /Gwyn
>
> On 04/12/2007, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Long long time ago we had discussions about this, i think also related
> > to what google expects. I guess what we now have is a result of that.
> > But i cant remember what the pros and cons are
> >
> > 2007/12/4, Joe Toth <jo...@gmail.com>:
> > > When you setRedirect(true), wicket does a 302, temporary, redirect. The
> > > basic rule of thumb in SEO is if you want to pass all authority to a
> > > different page use 301 (permanent).
> > >
> > > http://www.seotoday.com/browse.php/category/articles/id/477/index.php
> > >
> > > Thoughts on adding something to Wicket to support this functionality?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: 302 vs. 301 Redirect
Posted by Gwyn Evans <gw...@gmail.com>.
I think the one thread was "Consistent homepage URL" from 2005Q2 - I
think the gist was that in the scenario there, it wasn't desirable
having the redirected URL becoming the one that the search engines
would always go to.
/Gwyn
On 04/12/2007, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Long long time ago we had discussions about this, i think also related
> to what google expects. I guess what we now have is a result of that.
> But i cant remember what the pros and cons are
>
> 2007/12/4, Joe Toth <jo...@gmail.com>:
> > When you setRedirect(true), wicket does a 302, temporary, redirect. The
> > basic rule of thumb in SEO is if you want to pass all authority to a
> > different page use 301 (permanent).
> >
> > http://www.seotoday.com/browse.php/category/articles/id/477/index.php
> >
> > Thoughts on adding something to Wicket to support this functionality?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
--
Download Wicket 1.3.0-rc1 now! - http://wicketframework.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: 302 vs. 301 Redirect
Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
Long long time ago we had discussions about this, i think also related
to what google expects. I guess what we now have is a result of that.
But i cant remember what the pros and cons are
2007/12/4, Joe Toth <jo...@gmail.com>:
> When you setRedirect(true), wicket does a 302, temporary, redirect. The
> basic rule of thumb in SEO is if you want to pass all authority to a
> different page use 301 (permanent).
>
> http://www.seotoday.com/browse.php/category/articles/id/477/index.php
>
> Thoughts on adding something to Wicket to support this functionality?
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org