You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by "Ismael Juma (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/05/18 08:34:12 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-3725) Update documentation with regards to XFS

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15288623#comment-15288623 ] 

Ismael Juma commented on KAFKA-3725:
------------------------------------

[~toddpalino], can you please check our current recommendation with regards to the filesystem and see if should be updated with more recent information? Thanks!

> Update documentation with regards to XFS
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-3725
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3725
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ismael Juma
>
> Our documentation currently states that only Ext4 has been tried (by LinkedIn):
> "Ext4 may or may not be the best filesystem for Kafka. Filesystems like XFS supposedly handle locking during fsync better. We have only tried Ext4, though."
> http://kafka.apache.org/documentation.html#ext4
> I think this is no longer true, so we should update the documentation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)