You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> on 2017/08/22 20:29:26 UTC
[VOTE] uimaj-2.10.1 rc1
Hi,
uimaj-2.10.1 rc1 is posted and ready for voting.
The issues fixed are here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/UIMA/versions/12340281#release-report-tab-body
The source and binary zip/tars are here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/2.10.1-rc1/artifacts
The eclipse update site is here (no need to download it, you can install
directly from here)
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/2.10.1-rc1/eclipse-update-site-uimaj
Maven artifacts are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1153/
SVN Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.10.1/
Please vote on release:
[ ] +1 OK to release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
Thanks.
-Marshall
Re: [VOTE] uimaj-2.10.1 rc1
Posted by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <cw...@apache.org>.
- Build from source on linux using ibm jdk8 and got an error
OptimizeStringsTest.testOpStr:76->checkOffset:87 expected:<0> but
was:<2>
Marshall said this failure is not critical and happens with ibm jdk only.
- Spot checked signatures - OK
- Installed uima jars into ducc and run a few DD jobs - OK
- Checked README, LICENSE, RELEASE_NOTES - OK
- Spot checked documentation - OK
- JIRA report - OK
[X] +1 OK to release
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> checked signatures: OK. (first had to convert from DOS to Unix format)
> installed binary and ran many UIMA pipelines - OK
> tested the new file: & path: prefix notation for external overrides - OK
> built from source & checked signatures: OK
> checked api change report: OK
> checked issues fixed OK
>
> [X] +1 OK to release
>
> ~Burn
>
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Marshall Schor <sc...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > signatures: ok
> >
> > build from source: OK
> >
> > compare source release with tag: OK
> >
> > api change report: OK
> >
> > issues fixed OK (9 vs 10 on the jira web site - discrepancy due to one
> > resolution "Not a Problem".)
> >
> > compare of licenses, notices - no change viz 2.10.0
> >
> > Spot check repository.apache.org for license/notice: OK
> >
> > install from distribution, ran document analyzer, doc viewer - OK
> >
> > install into Eclipse Oxygen ok, ran component descriptor editor, and
> > jcasgen - OK
> >
> > [X] +1 OK to release
> > - -Marshall Schor
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (MingW32)
> >
> > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJZnKa5AAoJEMx2L/3NBM/WxMUQALWxzJ57a8Oo8+4XkTfYzqSk
> > rMlBXOqTRpQ4DVfOrht3idmEQ7tU34eMMj3kfFnaFnpWGTjTma0Nx1E/j6GQX03Y
> > MVG1NFFsnb8e0vyb+rLx6qvMXc5NmkvYFBp2XhkLN76YbvoZoqAussdG6bD3022Q
> > 7Z4ziGhOqb8IFOofx+NJldzoJu/qu5YGHrA9dQrWF0fyYE7i2QrCcBDelLYc1tSP
> > Ef7cp+6dhrK/gG4w5HYxKxPHIU3ccoihTf0xDmVowHvK2Rq0s99lyQ4bUITywqmk
> > 3993nROXAh+q2p4pSosfkmsRA2h8fQbJWsb4TyqmFKAgfGIDYaU8ckaPCq+OvoD1
> > yqYXqCobzfsuqpyjSjwWnBBrFr3zEnIFwvSZnMm+VBcAq58CpbWRKbaKndKAPHI3
> > Y+5ZMPJRDCu6aUP/ZfyvhI6r8Lz0kzBSlxaEou+oqCnlqyrMineAlR501td72dcn
> > Khc0A7YbS70n3f6CBfDOEezbDTBQ4tsiREBpv1XAhezuZaJoH8isLfSn+1RwMzb2
> > l46Ie9etBPa/8QYEd3x5K8TzE55WXj7cEeYQiNC2GSFkXfpE4rgwlK2E1sGlXtco
> > qgyaPnD8KkDBcaPQX+1sR2LXblhZrT0vBF7V72m3ln/66XTodCO972Rf3a8GGlE1
> > kLFxFgQR7ag88lc9qijV
> > =C0B+
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj-2.10.1 rc1
Posted by Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>.
checked signatures: OK. (first had to convert from DOS to Unix format)
installed binary and ran many UIMA pipelines - OK
tested the new file: & path: prefix notation for external overrides - OK
built from source & checked signatures: OK
checked api change report: OK
checked issues fixed OK
[X] +1 OK to release
~Burn
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Marshall Schor <sc...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> signatures: ok
>
> build from source: OK
>
> compare source release with tag: OK
>
> api change report: OK
>
> issues fixed OK (9 vs 10 on the jira web site - discrepancy due to one
> resolution "Not a Problem".)
>
> compare of licenses, notices - no change viz 2.10.0
>
> Spot check repository.apache.org for license/notice: OK
>
> install from distribution, ran document analyzer, doc viewer - OK
>
> install into Eclipse Oxygen ok, ran component descriptor editor, and
> jcasgen - OK
>
> [X] +1 OK to release
> - -Marshall Schor
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (MingW32)
>
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJZnKa5AAoJEMx2L/3NBM/WxMUQALWxzJ57a8Oo8+4XkTfYzqSk
> rMlBXOqTRpQ4DVfOrht3idmEQ7tU34eMMj3kfFnaFnpWGTjTma0Nx1E/j6GQX03Y
> MVG1NFFsnb8e0vyb+rLx6qvMXc5NmkvYFBp2XhkLN76YbvoZoqAussdG6bD3022Q
> 7Z4ziGhOqb8IFOofx+NJldzoJu/qu5YGHrA9dQrWF0fyYE7i2QrCcBDelLYc1tSP
> Ef7cp+6dhrK/gG4w5HYxKxPHIU3ccoihTf0xDmVowHvK2Rq0s99lyQ4bUITywqmk
> 3993nROXAh+q2p4pSosfkmsRA2h8fQbJWsb4TyqmFKAgfGIDYaU8ckaPCq+OvoD1
> yqYXqCobzfsuqpyjSjwWnBBrFr3zEnIFwvSZnMm+VBcAq58CpbWRKbaKndKAPHI3
> Y+5ZMPJRDCu6aUP/ZfyvhI6r8Lz0kzBSlxaEou+oqCnlqyrMineAlR501td72dcn
> Khc0A7YbS70n3f6CBfDOEezbDTBQ4tsiREBpv1XAhezuZaJoH8isLfSn+1RwMzb2
> l46Ie9etBPa/8QYEd3x5K8TzE55WXj7cEeYQiNC2GSFkXfpE4rgwlK2E1sGlXtco
> qgyaPnD8KkDBcaPQX+1sR2LXblhZrT0vBF7V72m3ln/66XTodCO972Rf3a8GGlE1
> kLFxFgQR7ag88lc9qijV
> =C0B+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj-2.10.1 rc1
Posted by Marshall Schor <sc...@apache.org>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
signatures: ok
build from source: OK
compare source release with tag: OK
api change report: OK
issues fixed OK (9 vs 10 on the jira web site - discrepancy due to one
resolution "Not a Problem".)
compare of licenses, notices - no change viz 2.10.0
Spot check repository.apache.org for license/notice: OK
install from distribution, ran document analyzer, doc viewer - OK
install into Eclipse Oxygen ok, ran component descriptor editor, and jcasgen - OK
[X] +1 OK to release
- -Marshall Schor
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (MingW32)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=C0B+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] uimaj-2.10.1 rc1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Hi,
Thanks for testing, even if it's after the fact... :-)
The iteration order was slightly changed for otherwise equal feature structures
to improve reproducibility.
Before, if you had a lot of instances of FS (say a subtype of Annotation) with
the same begin and end, and you removed one from the index, and later
re-inserted it, it would go back in some arbitrary spot among the set of equal
begin/end items.
While this is "correct" (in that the order within comparator-equal items is not
specified), if the index is iterated over, the order of the iteration could
change due to this. The fix was to insure it was put back in the same sequence
as before, so the iteration order (all other things being the same) would be
constant.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5533
Cheers. -Marshall
On 8/30/2017 4:55 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
> Thanks for the release! Sorry I didn't make the vote (again).
>
> I just upgraded DKPro Core to the new version. Due to the change
> in iteration order, I had to update a few unit tests, but otherwise
> all appears to be fine.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard
>
>> On 29.08.2017, at 20:57, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>
>> The vote passes, with 3 +1 votes and no other votes received:
>>
>> +1 Marshall Schor
>>
>> +1 Burn Lewis
>>
>> +1 Jaroslaw Cwiklik
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who reviewed and voted on this release.
>>
>> -Marshall
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] uimaj-2.10.1 rc1
Posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org>.
Thanks for the release! Sorry I didn't make the vote (again).
I just upgraded DKPro Core to the new version. Due to the change
in iteration order, I had to update a few unit tests, but otherwise
all appears to be fine.
Cheers,
-- Richard
> On 29.08.2017, at 20:57, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
> The vote passes, with 3 +1 votes and no other votes received:
>
> +1 Marshall Schor
>
> +1 Burn Lewis
>
> +1 Jaroslaw Cwiklik
>
> Thanks to everyone who reviewed and voted on this release.
>
> -Marshall
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] uimaj-2.10.1 rc1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
The vote passes, with 3 +1 votes and no other votes received:
+1 Marshall Schor
+1 Burn Lewis
+1 Jaroslaw Cwiklik
Thanks to everyone who reviewed and voted on this release.
-Marshall
On 8/22/2017 4:29 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> uimaj-2.10.1 rc1 is posted and ready for voting.
>
> The issues fixed are here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/UIMA/versions/12340281#release-report-tab-body
>
> The source and binary zip/tars are here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/2.10.1-rc1/artifacts
>
> The eclipse update site is here (no need to download it, you can install
> directly from here)
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/2.10.1-rc1/eclipse-update-site-uimaj
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1153/
>
> SVN Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.10.1/
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Marshall
>
>