You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@spamassassin.apache.org by sp...@incubator.apache.org on 2004/07/29 12:05:28 UTC

[SpamAssassin Wiki] Updated: AvoidingFpsForSenders

   Date: 2004-07-29T03:05:27
   Editor: DanielQuinlan <qu...@pathname.com>
   Wiki: SpamAssassin Wiki
   Page: AvoidingFpsForSenders
   URL: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AvoidingFpsForSenders

   no comment

Change Log:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -1,22 +1,28 @@
-= Some Tips on Avoiding False Positives, For Senders =
+= Some Tips for Legitimate Senders to Avoid False Positives =
 
-Tip: be sure not to use excessive spacing and or capitalization on your subject (as this will be scanned too!)
+Tip: use normal conversational English, be sure not to use excessive spacing and or capitalization on your subject (as this will be scanned too!)
 
-Tip: examine exactly which rules were triggered. Take careful note of the _points_ listed beside each rule name -- low-scoring rules do not make much of a difference, it's the ones with high scores that need to be avoided.
-
-Tip: if there are hits in the body of your mail-out, try rephrasing those sentences. We find that spam often uses _exactly_ the same phrases, over and over again, so we detect specific lines of text, and in most cases, synonyms are ignored.
+Tip: examine exactly which rules were triggered if a message was marked as spam or nearly marked as spam. Take careful note of the _points_ listed beside each rule name -- low-scoring rules do not make much of a difference, it's the ones with high scores that need to be avoided.
 
 Tip: don't use similar techniques that spammers use to disguise key words, like spacing out the letters or placing punctuation in odd places in the words. The statistics for use of these techniques show that it occurs far more frequently in spam mails.
 
-Tip: if a subscriber reports that SpamAssassin is blocking mails they want, and they did not ask their ISP to set it up -- get them to ask the ISP to take them off the filtering list! To be honest, sometimes we're as annoyed as you are about this. Spam filters should not be installed on an account unless the person _wants_ it there, in our opinion, since even nowadays some people don't get as much spam as others.  As a result, we ask ISPs to let the users opt in to using the filter.
+Tip: if a subscriber reports that SpamAssassin is blocking mails they want, and they did not ask their ISP to set it up -- get them to ask the ISP to take them off the filtering list! To be honest, sometimes we're as annoyed as you are about this. Spam filters should not be installed on an account unless the person _wants_ it there, in our opinion, since even nowadays some people don't get as much spam as others.  As a result, we ask ISPs to let the users enable or disable the filter.
+
+Tip: don't use 'bulk-mailing' tools used by spammers (i.e., advertised in spam). These are overwhelmingly used to send spam, so SpamAssassin blocks mail sent by those tools as soon as possible
 
-Tip: don't use 'bulk-mailing' tools used by spammers (ie. advertised in spam mails). These are overwhelmingly used to send spam, so we block those signatures as soon as we can.
+Tip: there are several whitelisting services which lower scores for sites using SpamAssassin network tests:
 
-Tip: check out Habeas ( http://www.habeas.com/ ).
-They use a copyrighted piece of text, with restrictive licensing terms that forbid its use in spam.
-They've also committed to suing spammers who attempt to subvert this model.
-Given that, as a result, we can count on mails with this token being non-spam[*], we're happy to give it "bonus points" and allow it through filters.
-(*Please* report spammers who illegally use the Habeas haiku -- see http://www.habeas.com/report/ .)
+ * Bonded Sender ( http://www.bondedsender.org/ )
+   Originators of legitimate email can now post a financial bond to ensure the integrity of their email campaign. Receivers who
+   feel they have received an unsolicited email from a Bonded Sender can complain to their ISP, enterprise, or IronPort and a
+   financial charge is debited from the bond.
+ * Habeas ( http://www.habeas.com/ ).
+   They use a copyrighted piece of text that has restrictive licensing terms that forbid its use in spam combined with
+   a DNS whitelist.  They have committed to sue spammers who violate the Habeas license.
+   Given that, as a result, we can count on mails with this token being non-spam[*], we're happy to give it "bonus points" and
+   allow it through filters.
+
+Please report any spam that is given bonus points for either of these services to the respective service.
 
 Some useful links:
 
@@ -24,13 +30,9 @@
   * SpamCon Foundation: Best practices for marketers: http://www.spamcon.org/directories/best-practices.shtml
   * Bulk e-mail HOWTO: http://spam.abuse.net/marketerhelp/bulk-howto.shtml 
 
-Other organizations we give "bonus points":
+Other methods for receiving "bonus points":
+
+  * HashCash ( http://hashcash.org/ )
 
-HashCash
-http://hashcash.org/
-which refers back to SpamAssassin in some of their documentation
-(
-http://hashcash.org/faq
-http://hashcash.org/draft-hashcash.txt
-).
-This is a technological solution, while Habeas is a social/legal solution.
+    See http://hashcash.org/faq and http://hashcash.org/draft-hashcash.txt.
+    This is a technological solution, while Bonded Sender is an economic solution and Habeas is a legal solution.