You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pdfbox.apache.org by Andreas Lehmkuehler <an...@lehmi.de> on 2013/05/27 20:39:19 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 1.8.2
Hi,
a candidate for the PDFBox 1.8.2 release is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~lehmi/pdfbox/1.8.2/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/1.8.2/
The SHA1 checksum of the archive is 672303f65d2574ebffa992f3723759f5b7af0c0d.
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 1.8.2.
The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
least three +1 PDFBox PMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache PDFBox 1.8.2
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Hers is my +1
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 1.8.2
Posted by Andreas Lehmkuehler <an...@lehmi.de>.
Hi,
Am 29.05.2013 16:03, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
> OK - give the fact that it's not 1.8.2's fault :-)
>
> +1 for 1.8.2
Thanks for reconsidering :-)
> BR
> Maruan Sahyoun
>
> Am 29.05.2013 um 16:00 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler <an...@lehmi.de>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Maruan Sahyoun <sa...@fileaffairs.de> hat am 29. Mai 2013 um 15:32
>>> geschrieben:
>>>
>>>
>>> -1 as the 1.8.x line introduced a regression in color handling which can be
>>> seen by PDFBOX-1615. In addition there is another report of the issue with an
>>> eMail on the users mailing list "Bad image colours using new overlay code".
>>> Both files work fine using 1.7.1. I don't know (yet) which change introduced
>>> that behavior.
>>
>> Hmm, that's odd. It's not 1.8.2 which introduces the issue but 1.8.0. So the
>> current
>> release candidate isn't responsible for that regression but fixes some other
>> issues.
>> So at least 1.8.2 is an improvement compared to 1.8.1 and it wouldn't make
>> things worse.
>>
>> I'd like to ask you to reconsider your veto, so that we don't have to wait for
>> fixing this issue.
>> Furthermore for some personal reasons I won't be able to act as release manager
>> for the next 3 weeks.
>>
>>> The issue can be reproduced by loading and saving the file so it's not because
>>> of Splitter or Overlay.
>>>
>>> Code to reproduce
>>>
>>> PDDocument document = new PDDocument.load(testfile)
>>> document.save(…)
>>> document.close();
>>>
>>> Opening the newly saved file in Adobe Reader the colors are no longer OK.
>> Sounds like PDFBOX-1610, or is it something else?
>>
>>> BR
>>> Maruan Sahyoun
>>>
>>> Am 27.05.2013 um 20:39 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <an...@lehmi.de>:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> a candidate for the PDFBox 1.8.2 release is available at:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~lehmi/pdfbox/1.8.2/
>>>>
>>>> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
>>>>
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/1.8.2/
>>>>
>>>> The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
>>>> 672303f65d2574ebffa992f3723759f5b7af0c0d.
>>>>
>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 1.8.2.
>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>>>> least three +1 PDFBox PMC votes are cast.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache PDFBox 1.8.2
>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hers is my +1
>>>>
>>>> BR
>>>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>>
>>
>> BR
>> Andreas Lehmkühler
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 1.8.2
Posted by Maruan Sahyoun <sa...@fileaffairs.de>.
OK - give the fact that it's not 1.8.2's fault :-)
+1 for 1.8.2
BR
Maruan Sahyoun
Am 29.05.2013 um 16:00 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler <an...@lehmi.de>:
> Hi,
>
>> Maruan Sahyoun <sa...@fileaffairs.de> hat am 29. Mai 2013 um 15:32
>> geschrieben:
>>
>>
>> -1 as the 1.8.x line introduced a regression in color handling which can be
>> seen by PDFBOX-1615. In addition there is another report of the issue with an
>> eMail on the users mailing list "Bad image colours using new overlay code".
>> Both files work fine using 1.7.1. I don't know (yet) which change introduced
>> that behavior.
>
> Hmm, that's odd. It's not 1.8.2 which introduces the issue but 1.8.0. So the
> current
> release candidate isn't responsible for that regression but fixes some other
> issues.
> So at least 1.8.2 is an improvement compared to 1.8.1 and it wouldn't make
> things worse.
>
> I'd like to ask you to reconsider your veto, so that we don't have to wait for
> fixing this issue.
> Furthermore for some personal reasons I won't be able to act as release manager
> for the next 3 weeks.
>
>> The issue can be reproduced by loading and saving the file so it's not because
>> of Splitter or Overlay.
>>
>> Code to reproduce
>>
>> PDDocument document = new PDDocument.load(testfile)
>> document.save(…)
>> document.close();
>>
>> Opening the newly saved file in Adobe Reader the colors are no longer OK.
> Sounds like PDFBOX-1610, or is it something else?
>
>> BR
>> Maruan Sahyoun
>>
>> Am 27.05.2013 um 20:39 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <an...@lehmi.de>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> a candidate for the PDFBox 1.8.2 release is available at:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~lehmi/pdfbox/1.8.2/
>>>
>>> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/1.8.2/
>>>
>>> The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
>>> 672303f65d2574ebffa992f3723759f5b7af0c0d.
>>>
>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 1.8.2.
>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>>> least three +1 PDFBox PMC votes are cast.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache PDFBox 1.8.2
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>
>>>
>>> Hers is my +1
>>>
>>> BR
>>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>
>
> BR
> Andreas Lehmkühler
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 1.8.2
Posted by Andreas Lehmkühler <an...@lehmi.de>.
Hi,
> Maruan Sahyoun <sa...@fileaffairs.de> hat am 29. Mai 2013 um 15:32
> geschrieben:
>
>
> -1 as the 1.8.x line introduced a regression in color handling which can be
> seen by PDFBOX-1615. In addition there is another report of the issue with an
> eMail on the users mailing list "Bad image colours using new overlay code".
> Both files work fine using 1.7.1. I don't know (yet) which change introduced
> that behavior.
Hmm, that's odd. It's not 1.8.2 which introduces the issue but 1.8.0. So the
current
release candidate isn't responsible for that regression but fixes some other
issues.
So at least 1.8.2 is an improvement compared to 1.8.1 and it wouldn't make
things worse.
I'd like to ask you to reconsider your veto, so that we don't have to wait for
fixing this issue.
Furthermore for some personal reasons I won't be able to act as release manager
for the next 3 weeks.
> The issue can be reproduced by loading and saving the file so it's not because
> of Splitter or Overlay.
>
> Code to reproduce
>
> PDDocument document = new PDDocument.load(testfile)
> document.save(…)
> document.close();
>
> Opening the newly saved file in Adobe Reader the colors are no longer OK.
Sounds like PDFBOX-1610, or is it something else?
> BR
> Maruan Sahyoun
>
> Am 27.05.2013 um 20:39 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <an...@lehmi.de>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > a candidate for the PDFBox 1.8.2 release is available at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~lehmi/pdfbox/1.8.2/
> >
> > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/1.8.2/
> >
> > The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
> > 672303f65d2574ebffa992f3723759f5b7af0c0d.
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 1.8.2.
> > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> > least three +1 PDFBox PMC votes are cast.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache PDFBox 1.8.2
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> >
> > Hers is my +1
> >
> > BR
> > Andreas Lehmkühler
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 1.8.2
Posted by Maruan Sahyoun <sa...@fileaffairs.de>.
-1 as the 1.8.x line introduced a regression in color handling which can be seen by PDFBOX-1615. In addition there is another report of the issue with an eMail on the users mailing list "Bad image colours using new overlay code". Both files work fine using 1.7.1. I don't know (yet) which change introduced that behavior.
The issue can be reproduced by loading and saving the file so it's not because of Splitter or Overlay.
Code to reproduce
PDDocument document = new PDDocument.load(testfile)
document.save(…)
document.close();
Opening the newly saved file in Adobe Reader the colors are no longer OK.
BR
Maruan Sahyoun
Am 27.05.2013 um 20:39 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <an...@lehmi.de>:
> Hi,
>
> a candidate for the PDFBox 1.8.2 release is available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~lehmi/pdfbox/1.8.2/
>
> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/1.8.2/
>
> The SHA1 checksum of the archive is 672303f65d2574ebffa992f3723759f5b7af0c0d.
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 1.8.2.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 PDFBox PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache PDFBox 1.8.2
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
>
> Hers is my +1
>
> BR
> Andreas Lehmkühler
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 1.8.2
Posted by Leleu Eric <er...@gmail.com>.
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for this release.
I checked the preflight behaviour with the Isartor Tests and my test set
(around 100 pdfs). It works fine for me.
Here is my +1.
BR,
Eric
2013/5/27 Andreas Lehmkuehler <an...@lehmi.de>
> Hi,
>
> a candidate for the PDFBox 1.8.2 release is available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~**lehmi/pdfbox/1.8.2/<http://people.apache.org/~lehmi/pdfbox/1.8.2/>
>
> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/pdfbox/tags/1.8.2/<http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/1.8.2/>
>
> The SHA1 checksum of the archive is 672303f65d2574ebffa992f3723759**
> f5b7af0c0d.
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 1.8.2.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 PDFBox PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache PDFBox 1.8.2
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
>
> Hers is my +1
>
> BR
> Andreas Lehmkühler
>
[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 1.8.2
Posted by Andreas Lehmkuehler <an...@lehmi.de>.
Hi,
I cancel this vote due to a regression which was introduced with
1.8.0 which leads to malformed pdfs when using indexed colorspaces.
As we already found a solution for the issue I'd like to redo the
release including the fix, see [1] for further information.
I'm going to start the release process in a couple of minutes.
I hope everybody agrees with my decision. :-)
Am 27.05.2013 20:39, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
> Hi,
>
> a candidate for the PDFBox 1.8.2 release is available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~lehmi/pdfbox/1.8.2/
>
> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/1.8.2/
>
> The SHA1 checksum of the archive is 672303f65d2574ebffa992f3723759f5b7af0c0d.
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 1.8.2.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 PDFBox PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache PDFBox 1.8.2
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
>
> Hers is my +1
>
> BR
> Andreas Lehmkühler
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1615