You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "ori (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/12/19 22:16:46 UTC
[jira] Commented: (CHAIN-40) ContextBase should use LinkedHashMap
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-40?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12658183#action_12658183 ]
ori commented on CHAIN-40:
--------------------------
There's additional overhead to using LinkedHashMap, HashMap is more efficient, especially if you're creating the Map on every request.
> ContextBase should use LinkedHashMap
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: CHAIN-40
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-40
> Project: Commons Chain
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Cédric BODIN
> Priority: Minor
>
> org.apache.commons.chain.impl.ContextBase should use java.util.LinkedHashMap (instead of java.util.HashMap) : as its superclass, and as the java.util.Map implementation for its "descriptors" attribute.
> Indeed LinkedHashMap allow "insertion-order" iteration over the context, which is an additional information about the chain execution (to know the order of the commands into the chain).
> Moreover LinkedHashMap is a HashMap : so this enhancement is "transparent" for users who didn't/don't/won't want to presume about context's iteration order.
> Thanks in advance.
> Cédric BODIN
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.