You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Hyrum K Wright <hy...@wandisco.com> on 2011/08/08 13:43:43 UTC
Re: [svnbench] Revision: 1154804 compiled Aug 8 2011, 00:21:20
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> neels@apache.org wrote on Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 02:09:53 +0000:
>> Timings for 5x5_1.6
>> ---
>> Timings for 5x5_trunk
>
> Shouldn't this test the 1.7 branch?
>
> (in addition to, or instead of, trunk)
Alternatively, are we still interested in these numbers? In other
words, are we early enough in the release cycle of 1.7 that something
we read in these numbers will influence the design of 1.7? (I would
guess "no" :) )
-Hyrum
--
uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
http://www.uberSVN.com/
Re: [svnbench] Revision: 1154804 compiled Aug 8 2011, 00:21:20
Posted by Neels J Hofmeyr <ne...@elego.de>.
On 08/08/2011 02:05 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 06:43:43AM -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>>> neels@apache.org wrote on Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 02:09:53 +0000:
>>>> Timings for 5x5_1.6
>>>> ---
>>>> Timings for 5x5_trunk
>>>
>>> Shouldn't this test the 1.7 branch?
>>>
>>> (in addition to, or instead of, trunk)
>>
>> Alternatively, are we still interested in these numbers? In other
>> words, are we early enough in the release cycle of 1.7 that something
>> we read in these numbers will influence the design of 1.7? (I would
>> guess "no" :) )
>
> It would be interesting to keep track of how trunk differs from 1.7.
That would indeed be interesting :)
Nevertheless, there is no need to post the results here. If any single
person asks me to stop, I'll stop, and instead people interested in the perf
ratings can ask me to add their email address as recipient. np.
~Neels
Re: [svnbench] Revision: 1154804 compiled Aug 8 2011, 00:21:20
Posted by Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de>.
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 06:43:43AM -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> > neels@apache.org wrote on Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 02:09:53 +0000:
> >> Timings for 5x5_1.6
> >> ---
> >> Timings for 5x5_trunk
> >
> > Shouldn't this test the 1.7 branch?
> >
> > (in addition to, or instead of, trunk)
>
> Alternatively, are we still interested in these numbers? In other
> words, are we early enough in the release cycle of 1.7 that something
> we read in these numbers will influence the design of 1.7? (I would
> guess "no" :) )
It would be interesting to keep track of how trunk differs from 1.7.