load-on-startup order seems incorrect...

[Jeff Wishnie <je...@deluxebiz.com>]

I have two load-on-startup servlets in my apps web.xml . One is set as 0,
the other as 1.

According the the servlet spec, containers should guarantee that servlet's
with lower load-on-startup values should load first, but according to my
logs, Servlet 1 gets its init called before servlet 0.

I'm using Tomcat 4.1.7 on Redhat 7.2

Any idea why the load is happening in the reverse order?

Thanks,

jeff


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

RE: load-on-startup order seems incorrect...

[Andy Eastham <an...@gliant.com>]

Jeff,

Try 10 and 20 or 1 and 2.

I know negative numbers don't necessarily start up before 1, maybe 0 doesn't
either.

Andy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Wishnie [mailto:jeff@deluxebiz.com]
> Sent: 05 September 2002 18:22
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: load-on-startup order seems incorrect...
>
>
> I have two load-on-startup servlets in my apps web.xml . One is set as 0,
> the other as 1.
>
> According the the servlet spec, containers should guarantee that servlet's
> with lower load-on-startup values should load first, but according to my
> logs, Servlet 1 gets its init called before servlet 0.
>
> I'm using Tomcat 4.1.7 on Redhat 7.2
>
> Any idea why the load is happening in the reverse order?
>
> Thanks,
>
> jeff
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>