You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Karan Malhi <ka...@gmail.com> on 2011/07/13 19:48:02 UTC

TomEE cdi

Currently TomEE ships with docs, examples, ejb-examples etc. For CDI
TCK, I do not see the need to bundle all these webapps with TomEE.
Should we create a separate TomEE bundle for CDI TCK with all these
goodies removed? Would it be a separate new project?

-- 

Karan Singh Malhi
twitter.com/KaranSinghMalhi

Re: TomEE cdi

Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
Ok, let's yank them.

On Jul 13, 2011, at 1:02 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:

> I agree - it makes sense to strip these apps out. Would be great to
> separately distribute the ejb-examples app and perhaps the moviefun app as
> WAR files as well.
> 
> Jon
> 
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>> lol, i thought it this morning, +1 to remove useless things
>> 
>> - Romain
>> 
>> 2011/7/13 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jul 13, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Karan Malhi wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Currently TomEE ships with docs, examples, ejb-examples etc. For CDI
>>>> TCK, I do not see the need to bundle all these webapps with TomEE.
>>>> Should we create a separate TomEE bundle for CDI TCK with all these
>>>> goodies removed? Would it be a separate new project?
>>> 
>>> We delete them for the TCK as well.
>>> 
>>> We could potentially remove them for TomEE in general.  Provided we can
>>> make some other easier way to run the examples.
>>> 
>>> -David
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 


Re: TomEE cdi

Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
I agree - it makes sense to strip these apps out. Would be great to
separately distribute the ejb-examples app and perhaps the moviefun app as
WAR files as well.

Jon

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<rm...@gmail.com>wrote:

> lol, i thought it this morning, +1 to remove useless things
>
> - Romain
>
> 2011/7/13 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>
> >
> > On Jul 13, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Karan Malhi wrote:
> >
> > > Currently TomEE ships with docs, examples, ejb-examples etc. For CDI
> > > TCK, I do not see the need to bundle all these webapps with TomEE.
> > > Should we create a separate TomEE bundle for CDI TCK with all these
> > > goodies removed? Would it be a separate new project?
> >
> > We delete them for the TCK as well.
> >
> > We could potentially remove them for TomEE in general.  Provided we can
> > make some other easier way to run the examples.
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: TomEE cdi

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
lol, i thought it this morning, +1 to remove useless things

- Romain

2011/7/13 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>

>
> On Jul 13, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Karan Malhi wrote:
>
> > Currently TomEE ships with docs, examples, ejb-examples etc. For CDI
> > TCK, I do not see the need to bundle all these webapps with TomEE.
> > Should we create a separate TomEE bundle for CDI TCK with all these
> > goodies removed? Would it be a separate new project?
>
> We delete them for the TCK as well.
>
> We could potentially remove them for TomEE in general.  Provided we can
> make some other easier way to run the examples.
>
> -David
>
>
>
>

Re: TomEE cdi

Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
On Jul 13, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Karan Malhi wrote:

> Currently TomEE ships with docs, examples, ejb-examples etc. For CDI
> TCK, I do not see the need to bundle all these webapps with TomEE.
> Should we create a separate TomEE bundle for CDI TCK with all these
> goodies removed? Would it be a separate new project?

We delete them for the TCK as well.

We could potentially remove them for TomEE in general.  Provided we can make some other easier way to run the examples.

-David