You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@stdcxx.apache.org by "Martin Sebor (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/08/26 23:21:30 UTC
[jira] Assigned: (STDCXX-235) std::vector::iterators not
symmetric
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Martin Sebor reassigned STDCXX-235:
-----------------------------------
Assignee: Martin Sebor
> std::vector<bool>::iterators not symmetric
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: STDCXX-235
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-235
> Project: C++ Standard Library
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: 23. Containers
> Environment: all
> Reporter: Martin Sebor
> Assignee: Martin Sebor
>
> Moved from the Rogue Wave bug tracking database:
> ****Created By: sebor @ Jun 27, 2000 01:05:10 PM****
> Chichiang Wan wrote:
> >
> > Chichiang Wan wrote:
> > >
> > > Martin,
> > >
> > > Iterator relation operator support is missing for vector<bool>. Is
> > > there a reason for that?
> > >
> >
> > I mean for mixing iterator and const_iterator.
> Well, getting the iterators working was quite a bit of work and we just ran out of time. (Also, given the chaos surrounding vector<bool> in general I didn't consider it as important as all the others.) I would recommend users to not use the class (#define _RWSTD_NO_VECTOR_BOOL). We will probably eventually rewrite vector<bool> and the iterators but I don't think it will happen anytime soon. I created incident #23164.
> Martin
> >
> > -- Chichiang
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.