You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@flume.apache.org by "Ashish Paliwal (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/11/05 12:29:33 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (FLUME-996) Flume SyslogWireExtractor vs Syslog4j

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Ashish Paliwal resolved FLUME-996.
----------------------------------
       Resolution: Won't Fix
    Fix Version/s: v0.9.5

Won't fix. 0.X branch not maintained anymore

> Flume SyslogWireExtractor vs Syslog4j
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLUME-996
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-996
>             Project: Flume
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: Master
>    Affects Versions: v0.9.4
>         Environment: Windows 7, Ubuntu 10.10
>            Reporter: Ambud Sharma
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: newbie, test
>             Fix For: v0.9.5
>
>
> Tested processing bandwidth of the SyslogWireExtractor and processed about 55MB in 47seconds compared to syslog4j that did 20MB.
> Also wondering if the extractor could be made multi-threaded



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)