You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by David Rees <dr...@gmail.com> on 2006/06/03 02:44:38 UTC
What happened to the mod_jk 1.2.16 release?
There was a thread in late March
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=114259566000001&r=1&w=2) which looked
like was going to lead to a new release of mod_jk which would fix a
number of outstanding bugs, but I never saw that 1.2.16 was tagged for
testing.
I'm willing to test once 1.2.16 is tagged as my servers are affected
by some of the known bugs in 1.2.15. Will the head of SVN planned on
being tagged for 1.2.16? I can pull that and use that for testing in
the meantime.
-Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: What happened to the mod_jk 1.2.16 release?
Posted by David Rees <dr...@gmail.com>.
On 6/5/06, Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org> wrote:
> Think I'm done with all the patches I had on my schedule.
> Feel free to check the HEAD.
I built the latest from SVN today and ran a few of my applications
through it and didn't notice any anomalies. Looks good so far, thanks!
-Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: What happened to the mod_jk 1.2.16 release?
Posted by Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>.
David Rees wrote:
>
> OK, I see that mladen has recently checked in some jk changes. As soon
> as he gives the word, I'll check out the latest from SVN and do some
> testing.
>
Think I'm done with all the patches I had on my schedule.
Feel free to check the HEAD.
Regards,
Mladen.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: What happened to the mod_jk 1.2.16 release?
Posted by David Rees <dr...@gmail.com>.
On 6/3/06, Rainer Jung <rj...@apache.org> wrote:
> Mladen Turk wants to add some small changes. After that we will do some
> testing again and then release. Any input from your side about
> intermediate test results on trunk will be highly appreciated.
OK, I see that mladen has recently checked in some jk changes. As soon
as he gives the word, I'll check out the latest from SVN and do some
testing.
-Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: What happened to the mod_jk 1.2.16 release?
Posted by Rainer Jung <rj...@apache.org>.
Mladen Turk wants to add some small changes. After that we will do some
testing again and then release. Any input from your side about
intermediate test results on trunk will be highly appreciated.
Most important changes until now:
- fixed bug, that disabled workers never will leave error state
- added piped mod_jk logging for Apache 1.3
- fixed log file corruptions
- Additional attribute "distance" to express preferences between
balanced workers of an lb
- Additional parameter "jvm_route" to be configure several workers for
the same tomcat target, e.g. to use them in differently configured lb
workers.
- Better behaviour of lb in settings which use domains and after error
recovery
- small performance improvements
- code simplifications in lb worker
The new atributes are already documented in the xml documentation
contained in subversion.
Rainer
David Rees wrote:
> There was a thread in late March
> (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=114259566000001&r=1&w=2) which looked
> like was going to lead to a new release of mod_jk which would fix a
> number of outstanding bugs, but I never saw that 1.2.16 was tagged for
> testing.
>
> I'm willing to test once 1.2.16 is tagged as my servers are affected
> by some of the known bugs in 1.2.15. Will the head of SVN planned on
> being tagged for 1.2.16? I can pull that and use that for testing in
> the meantime.
>
> -Dave
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org