You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au> on 2003/04/01 06:51:37 UTC
Re: The JavaCC and JJTree tasks....
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 07:23 am, Tom Copeland wrote:
>
> If there's a better way to post these patches, please let me know...
On BugZilla is probably better for tracking progress.
Do we need to be able to support both packages? Changing this is going to
break anybody still using the old versions.
Thoughts?
--
Conor MacNeill
Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/
Re: The JavaCC and JJTree tasks....
Posted by Tom Copeland <to...@infoether.com>.
> Not really. 8-) A patch that would enable the tasks to work with
> either version would be appreciated.
Sure thing, will do...
[much typing and testing commences]
Yours,
Tom
Re: The JavaCC and JJTree tasks....
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 01 Apr 2003, Tom Copeland <to...@infoether.com> wrote:
>> If possible we should support both (and I think there already is a
>> bugzilla report to that effect, including a patch IIRC).
>
> I poked around Bugzilla for a bit and couldn't find anything.
I was wrong. There is one for JDepend, which has similar problems
(changed directory structure in new release).
> Anyhow, sounds like you have this one under control...
Not really. 8-) A patch that would enable the tasks to work with
either version would be appreciated.
Stefan
Re: The JavaCC and JJTree tasks....
Posted by Tom Copeland <to...@infoether.com>.
> Hmm, Gump still uses the old version, so I guess others will be slow
> on switching as well.
Yup, JavaCC version updates have been few and far between. Hopefully
the package name change to org.netbeans.blah means that a full open
sourcing of JavaCC is on the way... this possibility has been bandied
about on the JavaCC mailing list a couple of times, but no one's made
any firm promises.
>
> If possible we should support both (and I think there already is a
> bugzilla report to that effect, including a patch IIRC).
I poked around Bugzilla for a bit and couldn't find anything. But maybe
I'm not entering the right query params.
Anyhow, sounds like you have this one under control... please let me
know if you need someone to do some testing or anything...
Yours,
Tom
Re: The JavaCC and JJTree tasks....
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au>
wrote:
> Do we need to be able to support both packages?
Hmm, Gump still uses the old version, so I guess others will be slow
on switching as well.
If possible we should support both (and I think there already is a
bugzilla report to that effect, including a patch IIRC).
Stefan