You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@zookeeper.apache.org by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com> on 2012/03/19 19:59:06 UTC
Pure Python bindings
It would be handy if there were pure Python bindings available. Are there any?
Regards,
Alan
Re: Pure Python bindings
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
On Mar 20, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>> I take the silence to mean that the answer is no. Would anyone have a problem if I worked on such a beast?
>
> You saw this right? afaik there isn't.
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/ZKClientBindings
>
> That's a loaded question. ;-) You're free to work on whatever you
> like, are you intending to contribute it back or host it yourself,
> or.... ?
I'm going to work on this during my copious free time; don't expect it out soon. This email is just a shout out that I'm currently tinkering with things.
I'm happy to contribute it to Zookeeper.
> FYI, likely you'd have to start by updating the code generator to
> generate python jute classes. See jute in the source tree.
Yeah, I have the Jute compiler generating the Python classes. I'm currently writing tests to make sure there's binary compatibility.
I'm thinking of writing very, very, low level functions on top of which more complex frameworks could be written in twisted/eventlet/greenlet.
Regards,
Alan
Re: Pure Python bindings
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> I take the silence to mean that the answer is no. Would anyone have a problem if I worked on such a beast?
You saw this right? afaik there isn't.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/ZKClientBindings
That's a loaded question. ;-) You're free to work on whatever you
like, are you intending to contribute it back or host it yourself,
or.... ?
FYI, likely you'd have to start by updating the code generator to
generate python jute classes. See jute in the source tree.
Regards,
Patrick
>
> On Mar 19, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> It would be handy if there were pure Python bindings available. Are there any?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>
Re: Pure Python bindings
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
Far from having a problem, I think that you would get a fair bit of support
if you wanted to work on this!
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>wrote:
> I take the silence to mean that the answer is no. Would anyone have a
> problem if I worked on such a beast?
>
Re: Pure Python bindings
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
I take the silence to mean that the answer is no. Would anyone have a problem if I worked on such a beast?
Regards,
Alan
On Mar 19, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> It would be handy if there were pure Python bindings available. Are there any?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>