You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> on 2006/12/22 05:36:22 UTC
Re: AntUnit
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Peter Reilly <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I haven't seen anybody complain about missing
>> > features in beta2, is
>> > AntUnit ready for a 1.0 release?
>
> Does it work with ant 1.6.5?
Not at all. Apart from relying on ResourceCollections it uses a bunch
of other API changes or the new backtrace attribute on macrodef.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: AntUnit
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Martijn Kruithof <jm...@kruithof.xs4all.nl> wrote:
> Not only that our testsuite of 1.7.0 final relies on it so
> definetely +1 here.
OK, that have been +1s by plenty of people by now. I'll build release
tarballs sometime latr this week/early next week so that we can vote
on them and have a release in the second week of 2007.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: AntUnit
Posted by Martijn Kruithof <jm...@kruithof.xs4all.nl>.
Antoine Levy-Lambert schreef:
> Hi,
>
> I have not done anything much with antunit yet, but I am also +1.
> It is a cool way of testing ant tasks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Antoine
>
Not only that our testsuite of 1.7.0 final relies on it so definetely +1
here.
Martijn
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:27:08 +0000
> Von: "Peter Reilly" <pe...@gmail.com>
> An: "Ant Developers List" <de...@ant.apache.org>
> Betreff: Re: AntUnit
>
>
>> On 12/22/06, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Peter Reilly <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> I haven't seen anybody complain about missing
>>>>>> features in beta2, is
>>>>>> AntUnit ready for a 1.0 release?
>>>>>>
>>>> Does it work with ant 1.6.5?
>>>>
>>> Not at all. Apart from relying on ResourceCollections it uses a bunch
>>> of other API changes or the new backtrace attribute on macrodef.
>>>
>> I just had a vague memory of a request to make antunit ant 1.6 compatible,
>> but I am cool with making it depend on ant 1.7.
>>
>> So +1 for releasing antunit 1.0.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>> Stefan
>>>
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: AntUnit
Posted by Antoine Levy-Lambert <an...@gmx.de>.
Hi,
I have not done anything much with antunit yet, but I am also +1.
It is a cool way of testing ant tasks.
Regards,
Antoine
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:27:08 +0000
Von: "Peter Reilly" <pe...@gmail.com>
An: "Ant Developers List" <de...@ant.apache.org>
Betreff: Re: AntUnit
> On 12/22/06, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Peter Reilly <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >> > I haven't seen anybody complain about missing
> > >> > features in beta2, is
> > >> > AntUnit ready for a 1.0 release?
> > >
> > > Does it work with ant 1.6.5?
> >
> > Not at all. Apart from relying on ResourceCollections it uses a bunch
> > of other API changes or the new backtrace attribute on macrodef.
> I just had a vague memory of a request to make antunit ant 1.6 compatible,
> but I am cool with making it depend on ant 1.7.
>
> So +1 for releasing antunit 1.0.
>
> Peter
>
> >
> > Stefan
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: AntUnit
Posted by Peter Reilly <pe...@gmail.com>.
On 12/22/06, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Peter Reilly <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > I haven't seen anybody complain about missing
> >> > features in beta2, is
> >> > AntUnit ready for a 1.0 release?
> >
> > Does it work with ant 1.6.5?
>
> Not at all. Apart from relying on ResourceCollections it uses a bunch
> of other API changes or the new backtrace attribute on macrodef.
I just had a vague memory of a request to make antunit ant 1.6 compatible,
but I am cool with making it depend on ant 1.7.
So +1 for releasing antunit 1.0.
Peter
>
> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org