You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@esme.apache.org by Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com> on 2010/01/27 19:15:22 UTC
ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Hi everyone,
Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits".
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue!
/Anne
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Wed January 27 2010 3:13:16 pm Ethan Jewett wrote:
> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I
> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my
> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure
> though.
You "kind of" can using the git-svn integration stuff. Instead of a git
push, it's a "git svn dcommit" to commit the commits that are on the branch in
your repo into the tracked branch in svn.
See some basic instructions at:
http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache
Anyway, I'm using the git-svn stuff for most of my CXF trunk work now. Seems
to work pretty well MOST of the time. (it's had a quirk here and there)
Dan
>
> Ethan
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> > What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
> >
> > http://git.apache.org/
> >
> >
> > If David was/is the only developer using git, then I
> > wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But
> > if others use it, it makes sense to request support
> > for git.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >
> >> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>
> >> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
> >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>
> >> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just
> >> delete it now.
> >> Or is anyone still using it?
> >>
> >> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >> > Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs
> >> > are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
> >> > so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
> >> > github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
> >> > mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
> >> > The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
> >> > the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested
> >> > user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
> >> > of svn.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> >
> >> >> From: Joe Schaefer
> >> >> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
> >> >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >> >>
> >> >> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends
> >> >> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
> >> >> need to be at the base directory of the package.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> ----- Original Message ----
> >> >>
> >> >>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >> >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
> >> >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
> >> >>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume?
> >> >>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the
> >> >>> trunk. At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as
> >> >>> well. What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it
> >> >>> is?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >> >>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has
> >> >>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
> >> >>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
> >> >>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >> >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
> >> >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Thanks Joe.
> >> >>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >> >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
> >> >>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47
> >> >>>>>>> "Some
> >> >>
> >> >> Licensing
> >> >>
> >> >>>>>>> Nits".
> >> >>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue!
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> /Anne
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's
> >> >>>>>> copyright interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well,
> >> >>>>>> see
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> __________________________________________________
> >> >>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> >> >>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >> >>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >> >>
> >> >> __________________________________________________
> >> >> Do You Yahoo!?
> >> >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >> >> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>.
And I second this! Thank you so much!
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @anne: Thanks again for making these svn commits. woot!
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>
>> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
>>
>> http://git.apache.org/
>>
>>
>> If David was/is the only developer using git, then I
>> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But
>> if others use it, it makes sense to request support
>> for git.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> > From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>
>> > To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
>> > Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> >
>> > The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just delete
>> it
>> > now.
>> > Or is anyone still using it?
>> >
>> > On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> >
>> > > Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs
>> > > are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
>> > > so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
>> > > github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
>> > > mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
>> > > The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
>> > > the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested
>> > > user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
>> > > of svn.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ----- Original Message ----
>> > >> From: Joe Schaefer
>> > >> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
>> > >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> > >>
>> > >> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends
>> > >> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
>> > >> need to be at the base directory of the package.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> ----- Original Message ----
>> > >>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> > >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
>> > >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
>> > >>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume?
>> > >>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the
>> trunk.
>> > >>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well.
>> > >>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is?
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has
>> > >>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
>> > >>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
>> > >>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> ----- Original Message ----
>> > >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> > >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
>> > >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Thanks Joe.
>> > >>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> > >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
>> > >>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some
>> > >> Licensing
>> > >>>
>> > >>>>>>> Nits".
>> > >>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue!
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> /Anne
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's
>> copyright
>> > >>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> __________________________________________________
>> > >>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> > >>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> > >>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> __________________________________________________
>> > >> Do You Yahoo!?
>> > >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> > >> http://mail.yahoo.com
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>.
@anne: Thanks again for making these svn commits. woot!
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>wrote:
> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
>
> http://git.apache.org/
>
>
> If David was/is the only developer using git, then I
> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But
> if others use it, it makes sense to request support
> for git.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>
> > To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
> > Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >
> > The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just delete
> it
> > now.
> > Or is anyone still using it?
> >
> > On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >
> > > Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs
> > > are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
> > > so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
> > > github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
> > > mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
> > > The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
> > > the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested
> > > user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
> > > of svn.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > >> From: Joe Schaefer
> > >> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
> > >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > >>
> > >> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends
> > >> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
> > >> need to be at the base directory of the package.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message ----
> > >>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
> > >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > >>>
> > >>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
> > >>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume?
> > >>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> > >>>
> > >>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the
> trunk.
> > >>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well.
> > >>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has
> > >>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
> > >>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
> > >>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
> > >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks Joe.
> > >>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
> > >>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some
> > >> Licensing
> > >>>
> > >>>>>>> Nits".
> > >>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue!
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> /Anne
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's
> copyright
> > >>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> __________________________________________________
> > >>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> > >>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > >>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> __________________________________________________
> > >> Do You Yahoo!?
> > >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > >> http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>
>
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>.
I just looked at various files in our repository (property files, html
files, etc.) and many do not have the apache license. There are some
scripts available(https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/).
Does one of the committers have a unix box where they run the scripts
to add the license to the other files. Before I run rat, I'd like to
change the licenses.
Scripts:
We also scripts in SVN with various copyrights. What do we need and
what can we toss. Is there a way to pull in these scripts via the
build process so that we are not part of our SVN?
Here are few examples below:
(http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/jquery-1.3.2.min.js?view=markup).
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/tip_balloon.js?view=markup
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/wz_tooltip.js?view=markup
D.
On 1/28/10, Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org> wrote:
> A bit late, but I would also like to have the git interface set up.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>> I would suggest sending the notifications to the dev list
>> instead of to one-or-two developer's inboxes, but otherwise
>> if you're happy with Hudson by all means stick with it.
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> From: Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 4:29:09 PM
>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>>
>>> Hudson is working fine - I'm thinking about hooking it up to our Amazon
>>> cloud instances
>>>
>>> D.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Wed January 27 2010 4:13:30 pm Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>> > > Not to overload this discussion with more extraneous information,
>>> > > but Gavin McDonald is the other contracted sysadmin at Apache
>>> > > who specializes in providing build/CI services with buildbot.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > That's also something this project would be well-advised to look
>>> > > into if it's not already participating in the hudson build farm
>>> > > at Apache.
>>> >
>>> > It's already in Hudson:
>>> > http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/ESME/
>>> >
>>> > I don't see any reason to change to buildbot if the Hudson stuff is
>>> > working
>>> > fine.
>>> >
>>> > Dan
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > ----- Original Message ----
>>> > >
>>> > > > From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>> > > > To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> > > > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:36:09 PM
>>> > > > Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Well at least we can't say ESME-47 was good for nothing ;-)
>>> > > >
>>> > > > We now have a NOTICE and a LICENSE file where they should be,
>>> > > > learned
>>> > > > that we can use git-svn and met a lot of awesome people on our
>>> > > > list.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On 27. jan. 2010, at 21.25, Ethan Jewett wrote:
>>> > > > > Clearly I should Google before assuming something can't be done.
>>> > > > > Thanks Joe and Daniel.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Ethan
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>> > > > >> Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn
>>> > > > >> server. There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do
>>> > > > >> to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability:
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> ----- Original Message ----
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >>> From: Ethan Jewett
>>> > > > >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> > > > >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM
>>> > > > >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>> > > > >>>
>>> > > > >>> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at
>>> > > > >>> least I
>>> > > > >>> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream
>>> > > > >>> from my
>>> > > > >>> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not
>>> > > > >>> sure
>>> > > > >>> though.
>>> > > > >>>
>>> > > > >>> Ethan
>>> > > > >>>
>>> > > > >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>> > > > >>>> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
>>> > > > >>>>
>>> > > > >>>> http://git.apache.org/
>>> > > > >>>>
>>> > > > >>>>
>>> > > > >>>> If David was/is the only developer using git, then I
>>> > > > >>>> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But
>>> > > > >>>> if others use it, it makes sense to request support
>>> > > > >>>> for git.
>>> > > > >>>>
>>> > > > >>>>
>>> > > > >>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> > > > >>>>
>>> > > > >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>> > > > >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> > > > >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
>>> > > > >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>> > > > >>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can
>>> > just
>>> > > > >>>>> delete
>>> > > >
>>> > > > it
>>> > > >
>>> > > > >>>>> now.
>>> > > > >>>>> Or is anyone still using it?
>>> > > > >>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>> > > > >>>>>> Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs
>>> > > > >>>>>> are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
>>> > > > >>>>>> so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from
>>> > > > >>>>>> infrastructure.
>>> > > > >>>>>> github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
>>> > > > >>>>>> mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
>>> > > > >>>>>> The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
>>> > > > >>>>>> the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any
>>> > > > >>>>>> interested
>>> > > > >>>>>> user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
>>> > > > >>>>>> of svn.
>>> > > > >>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> > > > >>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>> From: Joe Schaefer
>>> > > > >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> > > > >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
>>> > > > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends
>>> > > > >>>>>>> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those
>>> > > > >>>>>>> files
>>> > > > >>>>>>> need to be at the base directory of the package.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> assume? http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> file
>>> > to
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> the
>>> > > > >>>
>>> > > > >>> trunk.
>>> > > > >>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> as
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> well. What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> stay
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> where it is?
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> has
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> tree
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> that.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Joe.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed
>>> > ESME-47
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> "Some
>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>> Licensing
>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Nits".
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> issue!
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> /Anne
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Apache's
>>> > > >
>>> > > > copyright
>>> > > >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well,
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> see
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
>>> > around
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>> > > > >>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> > > > >>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
>>> > > > >>>>>>> around
>>> > > > >>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> __________________________________________________
>>> > > > >> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> > > > >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>> > > > >> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>> > >
>>> > > __________________________________________________
>>> > > Do You Yahoo!?
>>> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Daniel Kulp
>>> > dkulp@apache.org
>>> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>.
A bit late, but I would also like to have the git interface set up.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I would suggest sending the notifications to the dev list
> instead of to one-or-two developer's inboxes, but otherwise
> if you're happy with Hudson by all means stick with it.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 4:29:09 PM
>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>
>> Hudson is working fine - I'm thinking about hooking it up to our Amazon
>> cloud instances
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed January 27 2010 4:13:30 pm Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> > > Not to overload this discussion with more extraneous information,
>> > > but Gavin McDonald is the other contracted sysadmin at Apache
>> > > who specializes in providing build/CI services with buildbot.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > That's also something this project would be well-advised to look
>> > > into if it's not already participating in the hudson build farm
>> > > at Apache.
>> >
>> > It's already in Hudson:
>> > http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/ESME/
>> >
>> > I don't see any reason to change to buildbot if the Hudson stuff is working
>> > fine.
>> >
>> > Dan
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ----- Original Message ----
>> > >
>> > > > From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> > > > To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:36:09 PM
>> > > > Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> > > >
>> > > > Well at least we can't say ESME-47 was good for nothing ;-)
>> > > >
>> > > > We now have a NOTICE and a LICENSE file where they should be, learned
>> > > > that we can use git-svn and met a lot of awesome people on our list.
>> > > >
>> > > > On 27. jan. 2010, at 21.25, Ethan Jewett wrote:
>> > > > > Clearly I should Google before assuming something can't be done.
>> > > > > Thanks Joe and Daniel.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Ethan
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> > > > >> Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn
>> > > > >> server. There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do
>> > > > >> to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> ----- Original Message ----
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> From: Ethan Jewett
>> > > > >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM
>> > > > >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I
>> > > > >>> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my
>> > > > >>> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure
>> > > > >>> though.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Ethan
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> > > > >>>> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> http://git.apache.org/
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> If David was/is the only developer using git, then I
>> > > > >>>> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But
>> > > > >>>> if others use it, it makes sense to request support
>> > > > >>>> for git.
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> ----- Original Message ----
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> > > > >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
>> > > > >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can
>> > just
>> > > > >>>>> delete
>> > > >
>> > > > it
>> > > >
>> > > > >>>>> now.
>> > > > >>>>> Or is anyone still using it?
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>> Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs
>> > > > >>>>>> are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
>> > > > >>>>>> so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
>> > > > >>>>>> github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
>> > > > >>>>>> mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
>> > > > >>>>>> The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
>> > > > >>>>>> the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested
>> > > > >>>>>> user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
>> > > > >>>>>> of svn.
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> From: Joe Schaefer
>> > > > >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
>> > > > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends
>> > > > >>>>>>> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
>> > > > >>>>>>> need to be at the base directory of the package.
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> > > > >>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > >>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
>> > > > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
>> > > > >>>>>>>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I
>> > > > >>>>>>>> assume? http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file
>> > to
>> > > > >>>>>>>> the
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> trunk.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as
>> > > > >>>>>>>> well. What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay
>> > > > >>>>>>>> where it is?
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Joe.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed
>> > ESME-47
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> "Some
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Licensing
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Nits".
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> issue!
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> /Anne
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's
>> > > >
>> > > > copyright
>> > > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
>> > around
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>> > > > >>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> > > > >>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> > > > >>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> __________________________________________________
>> > > > >> Do You Yahoo!?
>> > > > >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> > > > >> http://mail.yahoo.com
>> > >
>> > > __________________________________________________
>> > > Do You Yahoo!?
>> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Daniel Kulp
>> > dkulp@apache.org
>> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>> >
>
>
>
>
>
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
I would suggest sending the notifications to the dev list
instead of to one-or-two developer's inboxes, but otherwise
if you're happy with Hudson by all means stick with it.
----- Original Message ----
> From: Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 4:29:09 PM
> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>
> Hudson is working fine - I'm thinking about hooking it up to our Amazon
> cloud instances
>
> D.
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> > On Wed January 27 2010 4:13:30 pm Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > Not to overload this discussion with more extraneous information,
> > > but Gavin McDonald is the other contracted sysadmin at Apache
> > > who specializes in providing build/CI services with buildbot.
> > >
> > >
> > > That's also something this project would be well-advised to look
> > > into if it's not already participating in the hudson build farm
> > > at Apache.
> >
> > It's already in Hudson:
> > http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/ESME/
> >
> > I don't see any reason to change to buildbot if the Hudson stuff is working
> > fine.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > >
> > > > From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > > > To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:36:09 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > > >
> > > > Well at least we can't say ESME-47 was good for nothing ;-)
> > > >
> > > > We now have a NOTICE and a LICENSE file where they should be, learned
> > > > that we can use git-svn and met a lot of awesome people on our list.
> > > >
> > > > On 27. jan. 2010, at 21.25, Ethan Jewett wrote:
> > > > > Clearly I should Google before assuming something can't be done.
> > > > > Thanks Joe and Daniel.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ethan
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > > >> Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn
> > > > >> server. There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do
> > > > >> to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ----- Original Message ----
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> From: Ethan Jewett
> > > > >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM
> > > > >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I
> > > > >>> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my
> > > > >>> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure
> > > > >>> though.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Ethan
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > > >>>> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> http://git.apache.org/
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> If David was/is the only developer using git, then I
> > > > >>>> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But
> > > > >>>> if others use it, it makes sense to request support
> > > > >>>> for git.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > > > >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
> > > > >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can
> > just
> > > > >>>>> delete
> > > >
> > > > it
> > > >
> > > > >>>>> now.
> > > > >>>>> Or is anyone still using it?
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > > >>>>>> Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs
> > > > >>>>>> are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
> > > > >>>>>> so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
> > > > >>>>>> github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
> > > > >>>>>> mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
> > > > >>>>>> The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
> > > > >>>>>> the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested
> > > > >>>>>> user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
> > > > >>>>>> of svn.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> From: Joe Schaefer
> > > > >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
> > > > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends
> > > > >>>>>>> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
> > > > >>>>>>> need to be at the base directory of the package.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > > > >>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > >>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
> > > > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
> > > > >>>>>>>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I
> > > > >>>>>>>> assume? http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file
> > to
> > > > >>>>>>>> the
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> trunk.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as
> > > > >>>>>>>> well. What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay
> > > > >>>>>>>> where it is?
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has
> > > > >>>>>>>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
> > > > >>>>>>>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
> > > > >>>>>>>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Joe.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed
> > ESME-47
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> "Some
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Licensing
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Nits".
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> issue!
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> /Anne
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's
> > > >
> > > > copyright
> > > >
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
> > around
> > > > >>>>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> > > > >>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > >>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > > > >>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > > >>
> > > > >> __________________________________________________
> > > > >> Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > > > >> http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Kulp
> > dkulp@apache.org
> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> >
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>.
Hudson is working fine - I'm thinking about hooking it up to our Amazon
cloud instances
D.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed January 27 2010 4:13:30 pm Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > Not to overload this discussion with more extraneous information,
> > but Gavin McDonald is the other contracted sysadmin at Apache
> > who specializes in providing build/CI services with buildbot.
> >
> >
> > That's also something this project would be well-advised to look
> > into if it's not already participating in the hudson build farm
> > at Apache.
>
> It's already in Hudson:
> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/ESME/
>
> I don't see any reason to change to buildbot if the Hudson stuff is working
> fine.
>
> Dan
>
>
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >
> > > From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>
> > > To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:36:09 PM
> > > Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > >
> > > Well at least we can't say ESME-47 was good for nothing ;-)
> > >
> > > We now have a NOTICE and a LICENSE file where they should be, learned
> > > that we can use git-svn and met a lot of awesome people on our list.
> > >
> > > On 27. jan. 2010, at 21.25, Ethan Jewett wrote:
> > > > Clearly I should Google before assuming something can't be done.
> > > > Thanks Joe and Daniel.
> > > >
> > > > Ethan
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > >> Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn
> > > >> server. There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do
> > > >> to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> ----- Original Message ----
> > > >>
> > > >>> From: Ethan Jewett
> > > >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM
> > > >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I
> > > >>> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my
> > > >>> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure
> > > >>> though.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Ethan
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > >>>> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> http://git.apache.org/
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> If David was/is the only developer using git, then I
> > > >>>> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But
> > > >>>> if others use it, it makes sense to request support
> > > >>>> for git.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > > >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
> > > >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can
> just
> > > >>>>> delete
> > >
> > > it
> > >
> > > >>>>> now.
> > > >>>>> Or is anyone still using it?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > >>>>>> Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs
> > > >>>>>> are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
> > > >>>>>> so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
> > > >>>>>> github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
> > > >>>>>> mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
> > > >>>>>> The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
> > > >>>>>> the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested
> > > >>>>>> user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
> > > >>>>>> of svn.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> From: Joe Schaefer
> > > >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
> > > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends
> > > >>>>>>> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
> > > >>>>>>> need to be at the base directory of the package.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > > >>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
> > > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
> > > >>>>>>>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I
> > > >>>>>>>> assume? http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file
> to
> > > >>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>
> > > >>> trunk.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>>>>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as
> > > >>>>>>>> well. What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay
> > > >>>>>>>> where it is?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has
> > > >>>>>>>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
> > > >>>>>>>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
> > > >>>>>>>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > > >>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Joe.
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed
> ESME-47
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> "Some
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Licensing
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Nits".
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> issue!
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> /Anne
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's
> > >
> > > copyright
> > >
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> > > >>>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> > > >>>>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
> around
> > > >>>>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> > > >>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> > > >>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > > >>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > >>
> > > >> __________________________________________________
> > > >> Do You Yahoo!?
> > > >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > > >> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Wed January 27 2010 4:13:30 pm Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Not to overload this discussion with more extraneous information,
> but Gavin McDonald is the other contracted sysadmin at Apache
> who specializes in providing build/CI services with buildbot.
>
>
> That's also something this project would be well-advised to look
> into if it's not already participating in the hudson build farm
> at Apache.
It's already in Hudson:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/ESME/
I don't see any reason to change to buildbot if the Hudson stuff is working
fine.
Dan
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>
> > From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>
> > To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:36:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >
> > Well at least we can't say ESME-47 was good for nothing ;-)
> >
> > We now have a NOTICE and a LICENSE file where they should be, learned
> > that we can use git-svn and met a lot of awesome people on our list.
> >
> > On 27. jan. 2010, at 21.25, Ethan Jewett wrote:
> > > Clearly I should Google before assuming something can't be done.
> > > Thanks Joe and Daniel.
> > >
> > > Ethan
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > >> Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn
> > >> server. There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do
> > >> to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message ----
> > >>
> > >>> From: Ethan Jewett
> > >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM
> > >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > >>>
> > >>> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I
> > >>> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my
> > >>> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure
> > >>> though.
> > >>>
> > >>> Ethan
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > >>>> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
> > >>>>
> > >>>> http://git.apache.org/
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If David was/is the only developer using git, then I
> > >>>> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But
> > >>>> if others use it, it makes sense to request support
> > >>>> for git.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
> > >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just
> > >>>>> delete
> >
> > it
> >
> > >>>>> now.
> > >>>>> Or is anyone still using it?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > >>>>>> Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs
> > >>>>>> are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
> > >>>>>> so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
> > >>>>>> github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
> > >>>>>> mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
> > >>>>>> The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
> > >>>>>> the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested
> > >>>>>> user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
> > >>>>>> of svn.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> From: Joe Schaefer
> > >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
> > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends
> > >>>>>>> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
> > >>>>>>> need to be at the base directory of the package.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > >>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
> > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
> > >>>>>>>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I
> > >>>>>>>> assume? http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to
> > >>>>>>>> the
> > >>>
> > >>> trunk.
> > >>>
> > >>>>>>>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as
> > >>>>>>>> well. What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay
> > >>>>>>>> where it is?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has
> > >>>>>>>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
> > >>>>>>>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
> > >>>>>>>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > >>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
> > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Joe.
> > >>>>>>>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> "Some
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Licensing
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Nits".
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> issue!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> /Anne
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's
> >
> > copyright
> >
> > >>>>>>>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> > >>>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> > >>>>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > >>>>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> > >>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> > >>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > >>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >>
> > >> __________________________________________________
> > >> Do You Yahoo!?
> > >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > >> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
<yo...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Well at least we can't say ESME-47 was good for nothing ;-)
>
> We now have a NOTICE and a LICENSE file where they should be, learned that
> we can use git-svn and met a lot of awesome people on our list.
>
>
> On 27. jan. 2010, at 21.25, Ethan Jewett wrote:
>
> > Clearly I should Google before assuming something can't be done.
> > Thanks Joe and Daniel.
> >
> > Ethan
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >> Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn
> >> server. There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do
> >> to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability:
> >>
> >>
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----
> >>> From: Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>
> >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>>
> >>> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I
> >>> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my
> >>> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure
> >>> though.
> >>>
> >>> Ethan
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >>>> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
> >>>>
> >>>> http://git.apache.org/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> If David was/is the only developer using git, then I
> >>>> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But
> >>>> if others use it, it makes sense to request support
> >>>> for git.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
> >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just
> delete it
> >>>>> now.
> >>>>> Or is anyone still using it?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs
> >>>>>> are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
> >>>>>> so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
> >>>>>> github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
> >>>>>> mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
> >>>>>> The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
> >>>>>> the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested
> >>>>>> user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
> >>>>>> of svn.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>>>>>> From: Joe Schaefer
> >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends
> >>>>>>> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
> >>>>>>> need to be at the base directory of the package.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
> >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
> >>>>>>>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume?
> >>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to
> the
> >>> trunk.
> >>>>>>>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well.
> >>>>>>>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has
> >>>>>>>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
> >>>>>>>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
> >>>>>>>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
> >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Joe.
> >>>>>>>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >>>>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47
> "Some
> >>>>>>> Licensing
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nits".
> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> /Anne
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's
> copyright
> >>>>>>>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> >>>>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >>>>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> >>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> Do You Yahoo!?
> >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>
>
>
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
<yo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well at least we can't say ESME-47 was good for nothing ;-)
I'm happy that this can be said now ;-)
And I did learn quite a bit along the way as well.
Thanks everybody for hanging in there!
-Bertrand
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
Not to overload this discussion with more extraneous information,
but Gavin McDonald is the other contracted sysadmin at Apache
who specializes in providing build/CI services with buildbot.
That's also something this project would be well-advised to look
into if it's not already participating in the hudson build farm
at Apache.
----- Original Message ----
> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>
> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:36:09 PM
> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>
> Well at least we can't say ESME-47 was good for nothing ;-)
>
> We now have a NOTICE and a LICENSE file where they should be, learned that we
> can use git-svn and met a lot of awesome people on our list.
>
>
> On 27. jan. 2010, at 21.25, Ethan Jewett wrote:
>
> > Clearly I should Google before assuming something can't be done.
> > Thanks Joe and Daniel.
> >
> > Ethan
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >> Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn
> >> server. There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do
> >> to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability:
> >>
> >>
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----
> >>> From: Ethan Jewett
> >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>>
> >>> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I
> >>> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my
> >>> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure
> >>> though.
> >>>
> >>> Ethan
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >>>> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
> >>>>
> >>>> http://git.apache.org/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> If David was/is the only developer using git, then I
> >>>> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But
> >>>> if others use it, it makes sense to request support
> >>>> for git.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
> >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just delete
> it
> >>>>> now.
> >>>>> Or is anyone still using it?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs
> >>>>>> are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
> >>>>>> so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
> >>>>>> github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
> >>>>>> mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
> >>>>>> The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
> >>>>>> the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested
> >>>>>> user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
> >>>>>> of svn.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>>>>>> From: Joe Schaefer
> >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends
> >>>>>>> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
> >>>>>>> need to be at the base directory of the package.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
> >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
> >>>>>>>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume?
> >>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the
> >>> trunk.
> >>>>>>>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well.
> >>>>>>>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has
> >>>>>>>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
> >>>>>>>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
> >>>>>>>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
> >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Joe.
> >>>>>>>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >>>>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some
> >>>>>>> Licensing
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nits".
> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> /Anne
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's
> copyright
> >>>>>>>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> >>>>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >>>>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> >>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> Do You Yahoo!?
> >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>.
Well at least we can't say ESME-47 was good for nothing ;-)
We now have a NOTICE and a LICENSE file where they should be, learned that we can use git-svn and met a lot of awesome people on our list.
On 27. jan. 2010, at 21.25, Ethan Jewett wrote:
> Clearly I should Google before assuming something can't be done.
> Thanks Joe and Daniel.
>
> Ethan
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn
>> server. There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do
>> to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability:
>>
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> From: Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>
>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM
>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>>
>>> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I
>>> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my
>>> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure
>>> though.
>>>
>>> Ethan
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>>> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
>>>>
>>>> http://git.apache.org/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If David was/is the only developer using git, then I
>>>> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But
>>>> if others use it, it makes sense to request support
>>>> for git.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>>>>
>>>>> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just delete it
>>>>> now.
>>>>> Or is anyone still using it?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs
>>>>>> are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
>>>>>> so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
>>>>>> github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
>>>>>> mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
>>>>>> The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
>>>>>> the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested
>>>>>> user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
>>>>>> of svn.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>>>>> From: Joe Schaefer
>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends
>>>>>>> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
>>>>>>> need to be at the base directory of the package.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
>>>>>>>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume?
>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the
>>> trunk.
>>>>>>>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well.
>>>>>>>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has
>>>>>>>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
>>>>>>>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
>>>>>>>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Joe.
>>>>>>>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>>>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some
>>>>>>> Licensing
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nits".
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> /Anne
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's copyright
>>>>>>>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>>>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>>>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>.
Clearly I should Google before assuming something can't be done.
Thanks Joe and Daniel.
Ethan
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn
> server. There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do
> to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability:
>
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>
>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM
>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>
>> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I
>> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my
>> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure
>> though.
>>
>> Ethan
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> > What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
>> >
>> > http://git.apache.org/
>> >
>> >
>> > If David was/is the only developer using git, then I
>> > wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But
>> > if others use it, it makes sense to request support
>> > for git.
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message ----
>> >> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> >> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> >>
>> >> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just delete it
>> >> now.
>> >> Or is anyone still using it?
>> >>
>> >> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs
>> >> > are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
>> >> > so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
>> >> > github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
>> >> > mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
>> >> > The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
>> >> > the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested
>> >> > user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
>> >> > of svn.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > ----- Original Message ----
>> >> >> From: Joe Schaefer
>> >> >> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
>> >> >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends
>> >> >> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
>> >> >> need to be at the base directory of the package.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ----- Original Message ----
>> >> >>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> >> >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
>> >> >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
>> >> >>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume?
>> >> >>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the
>> trunk.
>> >> >>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well.
>> >> >>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has
>> >> >>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
>> >> >>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
>> >> >>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> ----- Original Message ----
>> >> >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> >> >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
>> >> >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Thanks Joe.
>> >> >>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> >> >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
>> >> >>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some
>> >> >> Licensing
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Nits".
>> >> >>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue!
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> /Anne
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's copyright
>> >> >>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> __________________________________________________
>> >> >>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> >> >>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> >> >>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> __________________________________________________
>> >> >> Do You Yahoo!?
>> >> >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> >> >> http://mail.yahoo.com
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn
server. There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do
to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability:
http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache
----- Original Message ----
> From: Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>
> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM
> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>
> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I
> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my
> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure
> though.
>
> Ethan
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
> >
> > http://git.apache.org/
> >
> >
> > If David was/is the only developer using git, then I
> > wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But
> > if others use it, it makes sense to request support
> > for git.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
> >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>
> >> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just delete it
> >> now.
> >> Or is anyone still using it?
> >>
> >> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >>
> >> > Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs
> >> > are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
> >> > so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
> >> > github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
> >> > mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
> >> > The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
> >> > the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested
> >> > user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
> >> > of svn.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> >> From: Joe Schaefer
> >> >> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
> >> >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >> >>
> >> >> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends
> >> >> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
> >> >> need to be at the base directory of the package.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> ----- Original Message ----
> >> >>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >> >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
> >> >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
> >> >>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume?
> >> >>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the
> trunk.
> >> >>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well.
> >> >>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has
> >> >>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
> >> >>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
> >> >>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >> >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >> >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
> >> >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Thanks Joe.
> >> >>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >> >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
> >> >>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some
> >> >> Licensing
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>> Nits".
> >> >>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue!
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> /Anne
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's copyright
> >> >>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> __________________________________________________
> >> >>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> >> >>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >> >>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> __________________________________________________
> >> >> Do You Yahoo!?
> >> >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >> >> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>.
Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I
do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my
git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure
though.
Ethan
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
>
> http://git.apache.org/
>
>
> If David was/is the only developer using git, then I
> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But
> if others use it, it makes sense to request support
> for git.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>
>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>
>> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just delete it
>> now.
>> Or is anyone still using it?
>>
>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>
>> > Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs
>> > are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
>> > so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
>> > github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
>> > mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
>> > The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
>> > the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested
>> > user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
>> > of svn.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message ----
>> >> From: Joe Schaefer
>> >> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> >>
>> >> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends
>> >> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
>> >> need to be at the base directory of the package.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message ----
>> >>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
>> >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> >>>
>> >>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
>> >>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume?
>> >>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
>> >>>
>> >>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the trunk.
>> >>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well.
>> >>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has
>> >>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
>> >>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
>> >>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----
>> >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
>> >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks Joe.
>> >>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
>> >>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some
>> >> Licensing
>> >>>
>> >>>>>>> Nits".
>> >>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue!
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> /Anne
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's copyright
>> >>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> __________________________________________________
>> >>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> >>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> >>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> __________________________________________________
>> >> Do You Yahoo!?
>> >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> >> http://mail.yahoo.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>
>
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
http://git.apache.org/
If David was/is the only developer using git, then I
wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But
if others use it, it makes sense to request support
for git.
----- Original Message ----
> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>
> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>
> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just delete it
> now.
> Or is anyone still using it?
>
> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> > Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs
> > are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
> > so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
> > github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
> > mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
> > The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
> > the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested
> > user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
> > of svn.
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: Joe Schaefer
> >> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
> >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>
> >> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends
> >> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
> >> need to be at the base directory of the package.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----
> >>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>>
> >>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
> >>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume?
> >>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> >>>
> >>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the trunk.
> >>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well.
> >>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has
> >>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
> >>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
> >>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
> >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks Joe.
> >>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
> >>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some
> >> Licensing
> >>>
> >>>>>>> Nits".
> >>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> /Anne
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's copyright
> >>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> >>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> Do You Yahoo!?
> >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>.
The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just delete it now.
Or is anyone still using it?
On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs
> are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
> so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
> github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
> mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
> The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
> the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested
> user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
> of svn.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>
>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>
>> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends
>> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
>> need to be at the base directory of the package.
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>>
>>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
>>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume?
>>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
>>>
>>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the trunk.
>>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well.
>>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>>
>>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has
>>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
>>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
>>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Joe.
>>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some
>> Licensing
>>>
>>>>>>> Nits".
>>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /Anne
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's copyright
>>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs
are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested
user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
of svn.
----- Original Message ----
> From: Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>
> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>
> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends
> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
> need to be at the base directory of the package.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
> > Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >
> > Good we are getting this sorted out now.
> > I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume?
> > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> >
> > I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the trunk.
> > At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well.
> > What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is?
> >
> >
> >
> > On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >
> > > The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has
> > > me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
> > > instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
> > > LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > >> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > >> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
> > >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > >>
> > >> Thanks Joe.
> > >> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> ----- Original Message ----
> > >>>
> > >>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > >>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
> > >>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some
> Licensing
> >
> > >>>> Nits".
> > >>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
> > >>>>
> > >>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> /Anne
> > >>>
> > >>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's copyright
> > >>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
> > >>>
> > >>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Joe!
Did another commit now with the changes.
On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.34, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends
> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
> need to be at the base directory of the package.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>
>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>
>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume?
>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
>>
>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the trunk.
>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well.
>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>
>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has
>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Joe.
>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some Licensing
>>
>>>>>> Nits".
>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Anne
>>>>>
>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's copyright
>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends
on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
need to be at the base directory of the package.
----- Original Message ----
> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>
> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>
> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume?
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
>
> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the trunk.
> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well.
> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is?
>
>
>
> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> > The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has
> > me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
> > instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
> > LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
> >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>
> >> Thanks Joe.
> >> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >>
> >>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>>
> >>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
> >>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>
> >>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some Licensing
>
> >>>> Nits".
> >>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
> >>>>
> >>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue!
> >>>>
> >>>> /Anne
> >>>
> >>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's copyright
> >>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
> >>>
> >>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>.
Good we are getting this sorted out now.
I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume? http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the trunk.
At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well.
What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is?
On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has
> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>
>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>
>> Thanks Joe.
>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
>>
>>
>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>
>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some Licensing
>>>> Nits".
>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
>>>>
>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue!
>>>>
>>>> /Anne
>>>
>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's copyright
>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
>>>
>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has
me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding
LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that.
----- Original Message ----
> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>
> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>
> Thanks Joe.
> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
>
>
> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >
> >> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
> >> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some Licensing
> >> Nits".
> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
> >>
> >> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue!
> >>
> >> /Anne
> >
> > Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's copyright
> > interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
> >
> > http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
> >
> >
> >
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Joe.
Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----
>
>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>
>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some Licensing
>> Nits".
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
>>
>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue!
>>
>> /Anne
>
> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's copyright
> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
>
> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
>
>
>
Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
----- Original Message ----
> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>
> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some Licensing
> Nits".
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
>
> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue!
>
> /Anne
Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's copyright
interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice