Fwd: Please double check board reports

["John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>]

I'm retrying this, got rejected last time.

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
Date: Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:41 PM
Subject: Please double check board reports
To: Log4CXX Dev <lo...@logging.apache.org>,
dev@taverna.incbuator.apache.org <de...@taverna.incbuator.apache.org>


Podlings,

I just manually updated the board reports.  Please double check that the
contents are correct.  You had heavy conflicts.

https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2016

John

Re: Fwd: Please double check board reports

[Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>]

Thanks for noticing, it seems part of my edits in the report had been
reverted, I fixed it now.


The incubator wiki is killing me..  I can't be alone. should we perhaps
suggest for the incubator to move to a git-based system for the reporting
(one file per project)? It's easy to cat them together with a shell script.

That is closer to how board reports work, isn't it? (But using svn)

The only challenge then is brand fresg podlings where no comitters have got
ICLAs and @apache.org accounts yet, but they could use pull requests.


On 8 Dec 2016 11:11 pm, "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org> wrote:

I'm retrying this, got rejected last time.

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
Date: Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:41 PM
Subject: Please double check board reports
To: Log4CXX Dev <lo...@logging.apache.org>,
dev@taverna.incbuator.apache.org <de...@taverna.incbuator.apache.org>


Podlings,

I just manually updated the board reports.  Please double check that the
contents are correct.  You had heavy conflicts.

https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2016

John