You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> on 2006/09/20 06:41:02 UTC
[lang] 2.2 RC1 rolled and ready for comments
I've gone ahead and done a first release candidate for 2.2.
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang/
Anyone have anything before I kick off a vote?
--
Bear in mind that to allow us to keep momentum with 2.3, I've created
a branch for Lang 2.2:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/lang/branches/LANG_2_2_X
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [lang] 2.2 RC1 rolled and ready for comments
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On 9/20/06, Stephen Colebourne <sc...@btopenworld.com> wrote:
> - Should we be using viewcvs.cgi still now we are on svn? Or is there a
> viewvc.cgi?
Fixed for next rc.
> - Tasks xdoc needs Stringbuf removing.
Fixed for next rc.
> - The release notes mentions changes from 2.0 to 2.1, which it probably
> shouldn't.
Leaving as is; will remove the 2.x notes in 3.0.
> - jar manifest doesn't include the X-... attributes detailed in the
> release docs for the build JDK.
Fixed for next rc.
> - there is no src-ide.zip in the binary download (io does this...)
Fixed for next rc, creates -javadoc.jar and -sources.jar.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [lang] 2.2 RC1 rolled and ready for comments
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On 9/20/06, Gary Gregory <gg...@seagullsoftware.com> wrote:
> > > - the jar is getting a little porky, at nearly 250K.
> >
> > 3.0 and removing deprecations might help a little there.
>
> Should we plan on delivering whatever we delete, like the enum package,
> in a separate jar for backwards binary compatibility?
Nope, life moves on. If we get some world shattering bug, we can
release 2.2.1, or 2.3.1 or something. Just as we would do 1.0.2 today
if there was need for a bugfix and lots of people couldn't move to
2.x.
A separate binary jar is just make-work I think, until we hit a time
when someone needs it. Better spent on dbcp, or cli, or ... :)
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: [lang] 2.2 RC1 rolled and ready for comments
Posted by Gary Gregory <gg...@seagullsoftware.com>.
> > - the jar is getting a little porky, at nearly 250K.
>
> 3.0 and removing deprecations might help a little there.
Should we plan on delivering whatever we delete, like the enum package,
in a separate jar for backwards binary compatibility?
Gary
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flamefew@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 2:37 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] 2.2 RC1 rolled and ready for comments
>
> On 9/20/06, Stephen Colebourne <sc...@btopenworld.com> wrote:
> > - Should we be using viewcvs.cgi still now we are on svn? Or is
there a
> > viewvc.cgi?
> >
> > - Tasks xdoc needs Stringbuf removing.
> >
> > - The release notes mentions changes from 2.0 to 2.1, which it
probably
> > shouldn't.
> >
> > - jar manifest doesn't include the X-... attributes detailed in the
> > release docs for the build JDK.
>
> Will change the above tonight. I left the 2.0->2.1 so people could
> figure out 2.0 to 2.2; but I was pretty vague on whether there was any
> value in that.
>
> > - there is no src-ide.zip in the binary download (io does this...)
>
> I've no itch to do that - though I do want to make a src.jar and
> javadoc.jar for the Maven-2 repository. I've been doing that by
> pulling the src out of all of the commons distros and making jars,
> rather than for just a single project.
>
> > - the jar is getting a little porky, at nearly 250K.
>
> 3.0 and removing deprecations might help a little there.
>
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [lang] 2.2 RC1 rolled and ready for comments
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On 9/20/06, Stephen Colebourne <sc...@btopenworld.com> wrote:
> - Should we be using viewcvs.cgi still now we are on svn? Or is there a
> viewvc.cgi?
>
> - Tasks xdoc needs Stringbuf removing.
>
> - The release notes mentions changes from 2.0 to 2.1, which it probably
> shouldn't.
>
> - jar manifest doesn't include the X-... attributes detailed in the
> release docs for the build JDK.
Will change the above tonight. I left the 2.0->2.1 so people could
figure out 2.0 to 2.2; but I was pretty vague on whether there was any
value in that.
> - there is no src-ide.zip in the binary download (io does this...)
I've no itch to do that - though I do want to make a src.jar and
javadoc.jar for the Maven-2 repository. I've been doing that by
pulling the src out of all of the commons distros and making jars,
rather than for just a single project.
> - the jar is getting a little porky, at nearly 250K.
3.0 and removing deprecations might help a little there.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: [lang] 2.2 RC1 rolled and ready for comments
Posted by Gary Gregory <gg...@seagullsoftware.com>.
> - The release notes mentions changes from 2.0 to 2.1, which it
probably
> shouldn't.
Personally, I like having the entire release history. When I upgrade
some old component and I am skipping a version, I like to know what I am
getting, not just what is in the latest.
> - the jar is getting a little porky, at nearly 250K.
This is not an issue for me. I certainly would not want >1 jar. Do we
compress the jar in the build? I'd even like to have a single commons
jar!
Gary
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:scolebourne@btopenworld.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 2:23 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] 2.2 RC1 rolled and ready for comments
>
> - Should we be using viewcvs.cgi still now we are on svn? Or is there
a
> viewvc.cgi?
>
> - Tasks xdoc needs Stringbuf removing.
>
> - The release notes mentions changes from 2.0 to 2.1, which it
probably
> shouldn't.
>
> - jar manifest doesn't include the X-... attributes detailed in the
> release docs for the build JDK.
>
> - there is no src-ide.zip in the binary download (io does this...)
>
> - the jar is getting a little porky, at nearly 250K.
>
> Stephen
>
>
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> > I've gone ahead and done a first release candidate for 2.2.
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang/
> >
> > Anyone have anything before I kick off a vote?
> >
> > --
> >
> > Bear in mind that to allow us to keep momentum with 2.3, I've
created
> > a branch for Lang 2.2:
> >
> >
>
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/lang/branches/LA
N
> G_2_2_X
> >
> >
> > Hen
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [lang] 2.2 RC1 rolled and ready for comments
Posted by Stephen Colebourne <sc...@btopenworld.com>.
- Should we be using viewcvs.cgi still now we are on svn? Or is there a
viewvc.cgi?
- Tasks xdoc needs Stringbuf removing.
- The release notes mentions changes from 2.0 to 2.1, which it probably
shouldn't.
- jar manifest doesn't include the X-... attributes detailed in the
release docs for the build JDK.
- there is no src-ide.zip in the binary download (io does this...)
- the jar is getting a little porky, at nearly 250K.
Stephen
Henri Yandell wrote:
> I've gone ahead and done a first release candidate for 2.2.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang/
>
> Anyone have anything before I kick off a vote?
>
> --
>
> Bear in mind that to allow us to keep momentum with 2.3, I've created
> a branch for Lang 2.2:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/lang/branches/LANG_2_2_X
>
>
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: [lang] 2.2 RC1 rolled and ready for comments
Posted by Gary Gregory <gg...@seagullsoftware.com>.
Our application builds and all tests pass with 2.2-rc1.
So, that's +1.
Gary
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flamefew@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 9:41 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: [lang] 2.2 RC1 rolled and ready for comments
>
> I've gone ahead and done a first release candidate for 2.2.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang/
>
> Anyone have anything before I kick off a vote?
>
> --
>
> Bear in mind that to allow us to keep momentum with 2.3, I've created
> a branch for Lang 2.2:
>
>
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/lang/branches/LA
N
> G_2_2_X
>
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: [lang] 2.2 RC1 rolled and ready for comments
Posted by Gary Gregory <gg...@seagullsoftware.com>.
I notice that the code coverage report was generated use Cobertura
version 1.6. How about migrating to the current version 1.8?
Gary
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flamefew@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 9:41 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: [lang] 2.2 RC1 rolled and ready for comments
>
> I've gone ahead and done a first release candidate for 2.2.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang/
>
> Anyone have anything before I kick off a vote?
>
> --
>
> Bear in mind that to allow us to keep momentum with 2.3, I've created
> a branch for Lang 2.2:
>
>
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/lang/branches/LA
N
> G_2_2_X
>
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org