You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/10/22 13:18:50 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (DERBY-974) ClientDriver can lose some connection properties

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Knut Anders Hatlen resolved DERBY-974.
--------------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 10.4.0.0
                   10.3.1.5
       Derby Info:   (was: [Patch Available])

Committed revision 587056 (trunk)
Committed revision 587058 (10.3)

> ClientDriver can lose some connection properties
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-974
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-974
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Network Client
>    Affects Versions: 10.1.2.1, 10.1.3.1, 10.4.0.0
>         Environment: Linux, Sun JRE 1.5
>            Reporter: Michael Hackett
>            Assignee: Jørgen Løland
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 10.3.1.5, 10.4.0.0
>
>         Attachments: ClientDriver.java-diff, derby-974-1.diff, derby-974-1.stat, derby-974-2.diff, derby-974-2.stat, derby-974-3.diff, PropertiesTest.java
>
>
> Internally, the ClientDriver class's appendDatabaseAttributes() method uses keys() on the connection properties to get a list of the property names. However, this misses any properties in the default set. The correct method for a Properties object is propertyNames(). This will return the same type of object as keys(), but will include all properties.
> (It is unfortunate that Sun chose to make Properties a subclass of Hashtable, instead of giving Properties a Hashtable, as the former exposes too much implementation.)
> The fix is to simply replace calls to keys() on all Property objects to use propertyNames(). A quick search revealed that this is not the only place in the code base where this is done, so a more thorough scan should be made.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.