You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> on 2015/11/04 01:57:04 UTC
Two backport issues pending for 0.98.16
Please have a look at HBASE-14611 and HBASE-14738 if you get a chance.
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Two backport issues pending for 0.98.16
Posted by Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org>.
Sounds reasonable.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> And mine.
>
> Ask for a review if patch has to change significantly from what is upstream
> I'd say. Otherwise, commit.
>
> St.Ack
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > You have my consent for auto-commit backports :)
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Waiting for reviews by committers for these two issues is holding up
> the
> > > 0.98.16 release. Any of yea, nay, or 'needs more work' will suffice.
> > > (smile)
> > >
> > > If there's little interest or available bandwidth in looking at such
> > > matters for the "LTS" 0.98 release going forward I would like your
> > consent
> > > to take the initiative to auto-commit backports after waiting one week
> > for
> > > review.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Please have a look at HBASE-14611 and HBASE-14738 if you get a
> chance.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>
Re: Two backport issues pending for 0.98.16
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
And mine.
Ask for a review if patch has to change significantly from what is upstream
I'd say. Otherwise, commit.
St.Ack
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
> You have my consent for auto-commit backports :)
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Waiting for reviews by committers for these two issues is holding up the
> > 0.98.16 release. Any of yea, nay, or 'needs more work' will suffice.
> > (smile)
> >
> > If there's little interest or available bandwidth in looking at such
> > matters for the "LTS" 0.98 release going forward I would like your
> consent
> > to take the initiative to auto-commit backports after waiting one week
> for
> > review.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Please have a look at HBASE-14611 and HBASE-14738 if you get a chance.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
Re: Two backport issues pending for 0.98.16
Posted by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>.
You have my consent for auto-commit backports :)
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> Waiting for reviews by committers for these two issues is holding up the
> 0.98.16 release. Any of yea, nay, or 'needs more work' will suffice.
> (smile)
>
> If there's little interest or available bandwidth in looking at such
> matters for the "LTS" 0.98 release going forward I would like your consent
> to take the initiative to auto-commit backports after waiting one week for
> review.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Please have a look at HBASE-14611 and HBASE-14738 if you get a chance.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
Re: Two backport issues pending for 0.98.16
Posted by Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Nick and Jon.
Going forward I will auto-commit backports issues (done whenever simple cherry picks don't apply) to 0.98 if unable to attract a review after one week. Thanks a lot! 0.98 will probably be in long term maintenance for at least all of next year. This will help me produce timely releases including changes that will improve the experience of users still on that version.
> On Nov 16, 2015, at 9:34 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Waiting for reviews by committers for these two issues is holding up the
>> 0.98.16 release. Any of yea, nay, or 'needs more work' will suffice.
>> (smile)
>>
>> If there's little interest or available bandwidth in looking at such
>> matters for the "LTS" 0.98 release going forward I would like your consent
>> to take the initiative to auto-commit backports after waiting one week for
>> review.
>>
>> +1 for the 0.98 branch.
>
>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Please have a look at HBASE-14611 and HBASE-14738 if you get a chance.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> - Andy
>>>
>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>>> (via Tom White)
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>
>
>
> --
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
Re: Two backport issues pending for 0.98.16
Posted by Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com>.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> Waiting for reviews by committers for these two issues is holding up the
> 0.98.16 release. Any of yea, nay, or 'needs more work' will suffice.
> (smile)
>
> If there's little interest or available bandwidth in looking at such
> matters for the "LTS" 0.98 release going forward I would like your consent
> to take the initiative to auto-commit backports after waiting one week for
> review.
>
> +1 for the 0.98 branch.
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Please have a look at HBASE-14611 and HBASE-14738 if you get a chance.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
Re: Two backport issues pending for 0.98.16
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Waiting for reviews by committers for these two issues is holding up the
0.98.16 release. Any of yea, nay, or 'needs more work' will suffice. (smile)
If there's little interest or available bandwidth in looking at such
matters for the "LTS" 0.98 release going forward I would like your consent
to take the initiative to auto-commit backports after waiting one week for
review.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> Please have a look at HBASE-14611 and HBASE-14738 if you get a chance.
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)