You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@accumulo.apache.org by "Josh Elser (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/04/30 23:29:09 UTC
[jira] [Created] (ACCUMULO-3766) Bulk ingest fails on volume
configuration mismatch
Josh Elser created ACCUMULO-3766:
------------------------------------
Summary: Bulk ingest fails on volume configuration mismatch
Key: ACCUMULO-3766
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3766
Project: Accumulo
Issue Type: Bug
Components: client
Reporter: Josh Elser
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 1.7.0
Saw this running the Bulk randomwalk module
{code}
error preparing the bulk import directory
java.io.IOException: hdfs://jelser-accumulo-6.novalocal:8020/tmp/bulk_15333dff-747b-47e2-ae23-781da54da3f4 is not in a volume configured for Accumulo
at org.apache.accumulo.master.tableOps.BulkImport.createNewBulkDir(BulkImport.java:149)
at org.apache.accumulo.master.tableOps.BulkImport.prepareBulkImport(BulkImport.java:178)
at org.apache.accumulo.master.tableOps.BulkImport.call(BulkImport.java:136)
at org.apache.accumulo.master.tableOps.BulkImport.call(BulkImport.java:70)
at org.apache.accumulo.master.tableOps.TraceRepo.call(TraceRepo.java:57)
at org.apache.accumulo.fate.Fate$TransactionRunner.run(Fate.java:73)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at org.apache.accumulo.fate.util.LoggingRunnable.run(LoggingRunnable.java:35)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
{code}
accumulo-site.xml has
{code}
<property>
<name>instance.volumes</name>
<value>hdfs://jelser-accumulo-6:8020/user/accumulo/data</value>
<description>comma separated list of URIs for volumes. example: hdfs://localhost:9000/accumulo</description>
</property>
{code}
My hunch is that I had issues because I put in the shortname instead of the FQDN in instance.volumes.
Some thoughts:
1. Can we make this error detection smarter?
2. Do we have this issue documented (where multiple names can refer to the same namenode)?
Marked as blocker against 1.7.0 to get visibility and discussion.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)