Re: [jira] Commented: (CXF-1390) Upgrade to Spring 2.5

[Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>]

I meant specifically  the CDATA versus java.lang.String complaint, which it
was hard for me to see as related  to CXF.

On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Wim Verreycken (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>
wrote:

>
>    [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12588566#action_12588566]
>
> Wim Verreycken commented on CXF-1390:
> -------------------------------------
>
> Sean O'Callaghan resolved CXF-1502.
> Resolution: Fixed
> Fix Version/s: 2.1
> Replaced org.apache.cxf.jaxws.javaee.String with
> org.apache.cxf.jaxws.javaee.CString
>
> do you mean a) compared with other frameworks used in combination with
> spring, or do you mean b) did this problem exist in celtix.
>
> a) yes
> b) don't know, never used celtix
>
> > Upgrade to Spring 2.5
> > ---------------------
> >
> >                 Key: CXF-1390
> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1390
> >             Project: CXF
> >          Issue Type: Bug
> >          Components: Core
> >    Affects Versions: 2.0.3
> >            Reporter: Dan Diephouse
> >         Attachments: cxf-spring-demo.war, cxf-spring-error.war,
> cxf-spring-error_stacktrace.rtf
> >
> >
> > CXF doesn't work correctly on Spring 2.5. For instance, you get this:
> > org.springframework.beans.factory.UnsatisfiedDependencyException: Error
> creating bean with name 'jrulesService': Unsatisfied dependency expressed
> through constructor argument with index 2 of type
> [org.apache.cxf.jaxws.JaxWsServerFactoryBean]: Ambiguous constructor
> argument types - did you specify the correct bean references as constructor
> arguments?
> > (What ever happened to the famed backward compatability!? :-) *sigh*)
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
>