You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by Fernando Wermus <fe...@gmail.com> on 2010/03/25 16:49:14 UTC
[wicket-stuff] project sitemap-xml
Hi all,
I need to develop sitemap for my web app. I see that there is a project
related to this problem. Which is its situation? Does anyone know?
thanks in advance
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
Re: [wicket-stuff] project sitemap-xml
Posted by Andreas Petersson <an...@petersson.at>.
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:49:14 -0300, Fernando Wermus
<fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I need to develop sitemap for my web app. I see that there is a
project
> related to this problem. Which is its situation? Does anyone know?
>
> thanks in advance
>
hi!
the sitemap-xml micro-project is a very simple thing that builds upon three
assumptions:
1) you want to build a sitemap according to
http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php - this is the language search engines
like.
2) the urls you want to expose in this xml are all mapped with wicket
bookmarkable strategies.
3) you want your xml to be generated on-the-fly as opposed to pre-rendered
then you can use the sitemap-xml from wicketstuff. it helps you with the
correct syntax.
unfortunately after some basic tests i have not yet seen it "in action"
being grabbed by the search engines to see if everything works fine. a bit
of feedback would be nice.
if there are request for enchancement or any uncertainties about it do not
hesitate to ask on the mailing list. as it stands now i have a bit spare
time at hand :)
best regards
andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: WicketFilter Config
Posted by Cemal Bayramoglu <jW...@cabouge.com>.
See if http://jweekend.com/dev/LegUp gives you an easy way to get started.
Regards - Cemal
jWeekend
OO & Java Technologies, Wicket
Consulting, Development, Training
http://jWeekend.com
On 25 March 2010 18:22, <MZ...@osc.state.ny.us> wrote:
> Due to the fact that SpringWebApplication is deprecated, we evaluated
> several ways of configuring Wicket using WicketFilter. I found
> ContextParamWebApplicationFactory to work with a Spring Annotation
> approach. SpringWebApplicationFactory also works with a Spring Annotation
> approach, but since it returns a SpringWebApplication (deprecated) should
> it be avoided?
>
> I would love to hear from the Wicket team as far as the recommended
> configuration.
>
>
>
> Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely
> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
> communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure
> under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if
> you have received this communication in error and delete this email from
> your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not
> to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the
> contents of this information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: WicketFilter Config
Posted by James Carman <jc...@carmanconsulting.com>.
Well, if you need to configure (i.e. set properties on, etc) your
application object via Spring, then you either need to use
SpringWebApplicationFactory or write your own class that does the same thing
(that's not deprecated).
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:36 PM, <MZ...@osc.state.ny.us> wrote:
> Yes we are using Spring. Our Spring configuration works with either the
> SpringWebApplicationFactory or ContextParamWebApplicationFactory.
>
>
>
>
> James Carman <jc...@carmanconsulting.com>
> 03/29/2010 04:31 PM
> Please respond to
> users@wicket.apache.org
>
>
> To
> users@wicket.apache.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: WicketFilter Config
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Do you want/need to configure your application via Spring?
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:27 PM, <MZ...@osc.state.ny.us> wrote:
>
> > Igor,
> > We are using WicketFilter with SpringWebApplicationFactory. This works
> > fine, but I've noticed SpringWebApplication has been deprecated, and
> since
> > SpringWebApplicationFactory returns a SpringWebApplication we tried the
> > ContextParamWebApplicationFactory which also works.
> >
> > Which is preferred, since SpringWebApplication is deprecated should we
> > avoid using it by using the ContextParamWebApplicationFactory?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>
> > 03/25/2010 05:03 PM
> > Please respond to
> > users@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
> > To
> > users@wicket.apache.org
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > Re: WicketFilter Config
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > recommended configuration is on our wiki's spring page
> >
> > -igor
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:22 AM, <MZ...@osc.state.ny.us> wrote:
> > > Due to the fact that SpringWebApplication is deprecated, we evaluated
> > > several ways of configuring Wicket using WicketFilter. I found
> > > ContextParamWebApplicationFactory to work with a Spring Annotation
> > > approach. SpringWebApplicationFactory also works with a Spring
> > Annotation
> > > approach, but since it returns a SpringWebApplication (deprecated)
> > should
> > > it be avoided?
> > >
> > > I would love to hear from the Wicket team as far as the recommended
> > > configuration.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended
> > solely
> > > for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
> > > communication may contain information that is protected from
> disclosure
> > > under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately
> if
> > > you have received this communication in error and delete this email
> from
> > > your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested
> > not
> > > to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the
> > > contents of this information.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended
> solely
> > for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
> > communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure
> > under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if
> > you have received this communication in error and delete this email from
> > your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested
> not
> > to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the
> > contents of this information.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely
> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
> communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure
> under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if
> you have received this communication in error and delete this email from
> your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not
> to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the
> contents of this information.
>
Re: WicketFilter Config
Posted by MZ...@osc.state.ny.us.
Yes we are using Spring. Our Spring configuration works with either the
SpringWebApplicationFactory or ContextParamWebApplicationFactory.
James Carman <jc...@carmanconsulting.com>
03/29/2010 04:31 PM
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org
To
users@wicket.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: WicketFilter Config
Do you want/need to configure your application via Spring?
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:27 PM, <MZ...@osc.state.ny.us> wrote:
> Igor,
> We are using WicketFilter with SpringWebApplicationFactory. This works
> fine, but I've noticed SpringWebApplication has been deprecated, and
since
> SpringWebApplicationFactory returns a SpringWebApplication we tried the
> ContextParamWebApplicationFactory which also works.
>
> Which is preferred, since SpringWebApplication is deprecated should we
> avoid using it by using the ContextParamWebApplicationFactory?
>
>
>
>
>
> Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>
> 03/25/2010 05:03 PM
> Please respond to
> users@wicket.apache.org
>
>
> To
> users@wicket.apache.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: WicketFilter Config
>
>
>
>
>
>
> recommended configuration is on our wiki's spring page
>
> -igor
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:22 AM, <MZ...@osc.state.ny.us> wrote:
> > Due to the fact that SpringWebApplication is deprecated, we evaluated
> > several ways of configuring Wicket using WicketFilter. I found
> > ContextParamWebApplicationFactory to work with a Spring Annotation
> > approach. SpringWebApplicationFactory also works with a Spring
> Annotation
> > approach, but since it returns a SpringWebApplication (deprecated)
> should
> > it be avoided?
> >
> > I would love to hear from the Wicket team as far as the recommended
> > configuration.
> >
> >
> >
> > Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended
> solely
> > for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
> > communication may contain information that is protected from
disclosure
> > under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately
if
> > you have received this communication in error and delete this email
from
> > your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested
> not
> > to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the
> > contents of this information.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended
solely
> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
> communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure
> under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if
> you have received this communication in error and delete this email from
> your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested
not
> to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the
> contents of this information.
>
Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure
under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if
you have received this communication in error and delete this email from
your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not
to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the
contents of this information.
Re: WicketFilter Config
Posted by James Carman <jc...@carmanconsulting.com>.
Do you want/need to configure your application via Spring?
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:27 PM, <MZ...@osc.state.ny.us> wrote:
> Igor,
> We are using WicketFilter with SpringWebApplicationFactory. This works
> fine, but I've noticed SpringWebApplication has been deprecated, and since
> SpringWebApplicationFactory returns a SpringWebApplication we tried the
> ContextParamWebApplicationFactory which also works.
>
> Which is preferred, since SpringWebApplication is deprecated should we
> avoid using it by using the ContextParamWebApplicationFactory?
>
>
>
>
>
> Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>
> 03/25/2010 05:03 PM
> Please respond to
> users@wicket.apache.org
>
>
> To
> users@wicket.apache.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: WicketFilter Config
>
>
>
>
>
>
> recommended configuration is on our wiki's spring page
>
> -igor
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:22 AM, <MZ...@osc.state.ny.us> wrote:
> > Due to the fact that SpringWebApplication is deprecated, we evaluated
> > several ways of configuring Wicket using WicketFilter. I found
> > ContextParamWebApplicationFactory to work with a Spring Annotation
> > approach. SpringWebApplicationFactory also works with a Spring
> Annotation
> > approach, but since it returns a SpringWebApplication (deprecated)
> should
> > it be avoided?
> >
> > I would love to hear from the Wicket team as far as the recommended
> > configuration.
> >
> >
> >
> > Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended
> solely
> > for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
> > communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure
> > under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if
> > you have received this communication in error and delete this email from
> > your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested
> not
> > to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the
> > contents of this information.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely
> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
> communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure
> under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if
> you have received this communication in error and delete this email from
> your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not
> to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the
> contents of this information.
>
Re: WicketFilter Config
Posted by MZ...@osc.state.ny.us.
Igor,
We are using WicketFilter with SpringWebApplicationFactory. This works
fine, but I've noticed SpringWebApplication has been deprecated, and since
SpringWebApplicationFactory returns a SpringWebApplication we tried the
ContextParamWebApplicationFactory which also works.
Which is preferred, since SpringWebApplication is deprecated should we
avoid using it by using the ContextParamWebApplicationFactory?
Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>
03/25/2010 05:03 PM
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org
To
users@wicket.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: WicketFilter Config
recommended configuration is on our wiki's spring page
-igor
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:22 AM, <MZ...@osc.state.ny.us> wrote:
> Due to the fact that SpringWebApplication is deprecated, we evaluated
> several ways of configuring Wicket using WicketFilter. I found
> ContextParamWebApplicationFactory to work with a Spring Annotation
> approach. SpringWebApplicationFactory also works with a Spring
Annotation
> approach, but since it returns a SpringWebApplication (deprecated)
should
> it be avoided?
>
> I would love to hear from the Wicket team as far as the recommended
> configuration.
>
>
>
> Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended
solely
> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
> communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure
> under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if
> you have received this communication in error and delete this email from
> your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested
not
> to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the
> contents of this information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure
under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if
you have received this communication in error and delete this email from
your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not
to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the
contents of this information.
Re: WicketFilter Config
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
recommended configuration is on our wiki's spring page
-igor
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:22 AM, <MZ...@osc.state.ny.us> wrote:
> Due to the fact that SpringWebApplication is deprecated, we evaluated
> several ways of configuring Wicket using WicketFilter. I found
> ContextParamWebApplicationFactory to work with a Spring Annotation
> approach. SpringWebApplicationFactory also works with a Spring Annotation
> approach, but since it returns a SpringWebApplication (deprecated) should
> it be avoided?
>
> I would love to hear from the Wicket team as far as the recommended
> configuration.
>
>
>
> Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely
> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
> communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure
> under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if
> you have received this communication in error and delete this email from
> your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not
> to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the
> contents of this information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
WicketFilter Config
Posted by MZ...@osc.state.ny.us.
Due to the fact that SpringWebApplication is deprecated, we evaluated
several ways of configuring Wicket using WicketFilter. I found
ContextParamWebApplicationFactory to work with a Spring Annotation
approach. SpringWebApplicationFactory also works with a Spring Annotation
approach, but since it returns a SpringWebApplication (deprecated) should
it be avoided?
I would love to hear from the Wicket team as far as the recommended
configuration.
Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure
under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if
you have received this communication in error and delete this email from
your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not
to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the
contents of this information.
Re: [wicket-stuff] project sitemap-xml
Posted by MZ...@osc.state.ny.us.
I would gather they are eluding to the fact that search engines may not
index url's with duplicate titles, so its a best practice to provide a
title unique to the url.
Fernando Wermus <fe...@gmail.com>
03/25/2010 01:46 PM
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org
To
users@wicket.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: [wicket-stuff] project sitemap-xml
Do you know why it is said in the page you mention, each pages should have
a
different title?
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Fernando Wermus
<fe...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Take a look at Xaloon project. It has a plug in about SEO. But It is a
plug
> in for Brix, I dont know much about it.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 2:03 PM, <MZ...@osc.state.ny.us> wrote:
>
>> I am also interested in a sitemap project. Check out the Wiki about
>> dynamic sitemap below. Would be nice if someone encapsulated this into
a
>> project for reuse.
>>
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/seo-search-engine-optimization.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Fernando Wermus <fe...@gmail.com>
>> 03/25/2010 11:49 AM
>> Please respond to
>> users@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>> To
>> users@wicket.apache.org
>> cc
>>
>> Subject
>> [wicket-stuff] project sitemap-xml
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>> I need to develop sitemap for my web app. I see that there is a
>> project
>> related to this problem. Which is its situation? Does anyone know?
>>
>> thanks in advance
>>
>> --
>> Fernando Wermus.
>>
>> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended
solely
>> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
>> communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure
>> under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if
>> you have received this communication in error and delete this email
from
>> your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested
not
>> to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the
>> contents of this information.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Fernando Wermus.
>
> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure
under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if
you have received this communication in error and delete this email from
your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not
to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the
contents of this information.
Re: [wicket-stuff] project sitemap-xml
Posted by Fernando Wermus <fe...@gmail.com>.
Do you know why it is said in the page you mention, each pages should have a
different title?
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Fernando Wermus
<fe...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Take a look at Xaloon project. It has a plug in about SEO. But It is a plug
> in for Brix, I dont know much about it.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 2:03 PM, <MZ...@osc.state.ny.us> wrote:
>
>> I am also interested in a sitemap project. Check out the Wiki about
>> dynamic sitemap below. Would be nice if someone encapsulated this into a
>> project for reuse.
>>
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/seo-search-engine-optimization.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Fernando Wermus <fe...@gmail.com>
>> 03/25/2010 11:49 AM
>> Please respond to
>> users@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>> To
>> users@wicket.apache.org
>> cc
>>
>> Subject
>> [wicket-stuff] project sitemap-xml
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>> I need to develop sitemap for my web app. I see that there is a
>> project
>> related to this problem. Which is its situation? Does anyone know?
>>
>> thanks in advance
>>
>> --
>> Fernando Wermus.
>>
>> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely
>> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
>> communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure
>> under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if
>> you have received this communication in error and delete this email from
>> your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not
>> to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the
>> contents of this information.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Fernando Wermus.
>
> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
Re: [wicket-stuff] project sitemap-xml
Posted by Fernando Wermus <fe...@gmail.com>.
Take a look at Xaloon project. It has a plug in about SEO. But It is a plug
in for Brix, I dont know much about it.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 2:03 PM, <MZ...@osc.state.ny.us> wrote:
> I am also interested in a sitemap project. Check out the Wiki about
> dynamic sitemap below. Would be nice if someone encapsulated this into a
> project for reuse.
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/seo-search-engine-optimization.html
>
>
>
>
> Fernando Wermus <fe...@gmail.com>
> 03/25/2010 11:49 AM
> Please respond to
> users@wicket.apache.org
>
>
> To
> users@wicket.apache.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> [wicket-stuff] project sitemap-xml
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
> I need to develop sitemap for my web app. I see that there is a
> project
> related to this problem. Which is its situation? Does anyone know?
>
> thanks in advance
>
> --
> Fernando Wermus.
>
> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>
>
>
>
>
> Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely
> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
> communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure
> under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if
> you have received this communication in error and delete this email from
> your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not
> to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the
> contents of this information.
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
Re: [wicket-stuff] project sitemap-xml
Posted by MZ...@osc.state.ny.us.
I am also interested in a sitemap project. Check out the Wiki about
dynamic sitemap below. Would be nice if someone encapsulated this into a
project for reuse.
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/seo-search-engine-optimization.html
Fernando Wermus <fe...@gmail.com>
03/25/2010 11:49 AM
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org
To
users@wicket.apache.org
cc
Subject
[wicket-stuff] project sitemap-xml
Hi all,
I need to develop sitemap for my web app. I see that there is a
project
related to this problem. Which is its situation? Does anyone know?
thanks in advance
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure
under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if
you have received this communication in error and delete this email from
your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not
to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the
contents of this information.