You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pulsar.apache.org by Christophe Bornet <bo...@gmail.com> on 2022/07/28 10:39:35 UTC
[VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
Hi, Pulsar community,
I'd like to start a vote on PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
You can find the proposal at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16739 and
the discussion thread at
https://lists.apache.org/thread/qn59jwn47w9ngxpkvq3kswbl1y882jth.
The vote will stay open for at least 48 hours.
Best regards.
Christophe Bornet
Re: [VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
Posted by Christophe Bornet <bo...@gmail.com>.
Thanks to you all,
Closing this vote with 8 +1s (4 bindings and 4 non-bindings) and no -1s.
We'll adjust the naming during the implementation.
Thanks,
Christophe
Le mar. 23 août 2022 à 07:04, Michael Marshall <mm...@apache.org> a
écrit :
> +1 (binding)
>
> I have some thoughts on naming, too.
>
> My preference is to call it a “mapper function”, though I think
> “decorator function” is a good name too. My concern with the
> preprocessing (and the correlated future postprocessing) name is that
> it's not clear to me what the "processing" step is. Converting a
> message to another message seems like the processing step for the
> source/sink.
>
> Either way, these are minor details. The feature looks good to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 12:55 PM Lari Hotari <lh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Good proposal. My only comment is about the naming. Instead of calling
> it a "preprocessing function" or "extra function", I'd propose calling it
> "decorator function".
> >
> > -Lari
> >
> > On 2022/07/28 10:39:35 Christophe Bornet wrote:
> > > Hi, Pulsar community,
> > >
> > > I'd like to start a vote on PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
> > >
> > > You can find the proposal at
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16739 and
> > > the discussion thread at
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/qn59jwn47w9ngxpkvq3kswbl1y882jth.
> > >
> > > The vote will stay open for at least 48 hours.
> > >
> > > Best regards.
> > >
> > > Christophe Bornet
> > >
>
Re: [VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
Posted by Michael Marshall <mm...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
I have some thoughts on naming, too.
My preference is to call it a “mapper function”, though I think
“decorator function” is a good name too. My concern with the
preprocessing (and the correlated future postprocessing) name is that
it's not clear to me what the "processing" step is. Converting a
message to another message seems like the processing step for the
source/sink.
Either way, these are minor details. The feature looks good to me.
Thanks,
Michael
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 12:55 PM Lari Hotari <lh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Good proposal. My only comment is about the naming. Instead of calling it a "preprocessing function" or "extra function", I'd propose calling it "decorator function".
>
> -Lari
>
> On 2022/07/28 10:39:35 Christophe Bornet wrote:
> > Hi, Pulsar community,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote on PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
> >
> > You can find the proposal at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16739 and
> > the discussion thread at
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/qn59jwn47w9ngxpkvq3kswbl1y882jth.
> >
> > The vote will stay open for at least 48 hours.
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
> > Christophe Bornet
> >
Re: [VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
Posted by Lari Hotari <lh...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
Good proposal. My only comment is about the naming. Instead of calling it a "preprocessing function" or "extra function", I'd propose calling it "decorator function".
-Lari
On 2022/07/28 10:39:35 Christophe Bornet wrote:
> Hi, Pulsar community,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
>
> You can find the proposal at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16739 and
> the discussion thread at
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/qn59jwn47w9ngxpkvq3kswbl1y882jth.
>
> The vote will stay open for at least 48 hours.
>
> Best regards.
>
> Christophe Bornet
>
Re: [VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
Posted by Baodi Shi <ba...@icloud.com.INVALID>.
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Baodi Shi
> On Jul 28, 2022, at 22:2028, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thank you
>
> I am sure that this feature will have a huge impact on Pulsar IO users
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno gio 28 lug 2022 alle ore 12:39 Christophe Bornet
> <bo...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>
>> Hi, Pulsar community,
>>
>> I'd like to start a vote on PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
>>
>> You can find the proposal at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16739 and
>> the discussion thread at
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/qn59jwn47w9ngxpkvq3kswbl1y882jth.
>>
>> The vote will stay open for at least 48 hours.
>>
>> Best regards.
>>
>> Christophe Bornet
Re: [VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
Thank you
I am sure that this feature will have a huge impact on Pulsar IO users
Enrico
Il giorno gio 28 lug 2022 alle ore 12:39 Christophe Bornet
<bo...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
> Hi, Pulsar community,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
>
> You can find the proposal at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16739 and
> the discussion thread at
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/qn59jwn47w9ngxpkvq3kswbl1y882jth.
>
> The vote will stay open for at least 48 hours.
>
> Best regards.
>
> Christophe Bornet
Re: [VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
Posted by Qiang Huang <qi...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non binding)
Nicolò Boschi <bo...@gmail.com> 于2022年8月16日周二 17:28写道：
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Nicolò Boschi
>
>
> Il giorno mer 10 ago 2022 alle ore 01:34 Neng Lu <fr...@gmail.com> ha
> scritto:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Not sure if this is too late or not, I replied in the discussion thread
> > about some thinking.
> > Whether we tweak the sink connector or we allow a flexible and general
> > function creation.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 5:03 PM mattison chao <ma...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Mattison
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 01:56, Dave Fisher <wa...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > On 2022/07/28 10:39:35 Christophe Bornet wrote:
> > > > > Hi, Pulsar community,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to start a vote on PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
> > > > >
> > > > > You can find the proposal at
> > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16739 and
> > > > > the discussion thread at
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/qn59jwn47w9ngxpkvq3kswbl1y882jth.
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will stay open for at least 48 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards.
> > > > >
> > > > > Christophe Bornet
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Neng
> >
>
--
BR,
Qiang Huang
Re: [VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
Posted by Nicolò Boschi <bo...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non binding)
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 10 ago 2022 alle ore 01:34 Neng Lu <fr...@gmail.com> ha
scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure if this is too late or not, I replied in the discussion thread
> about some thinking.
> Whether we tweak the sink connector or we allow a flexible and general
> function creation.
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 5:03 PM mattison chao <ma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Mattison
> >
> > On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 01:56, Dave Fisher <wa...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On 2022/07/28 10:39:35 Christophe Bornet wrote:
> > > > Hi, Pulsar community,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to start a vote on PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
> > > >
> > > > You can find the proposal at
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16739 and
> > > > the discussion thread at
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/qn59jwn47w9ngxpkvq3kswbl1y882jth.
> > > >
> > > > The vote will stay open for at least 48 hours.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards.
> > > >
> > > > Christophe Bornet
> > > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Neng
>
Re: [VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
Posted by Neng Lu <fr...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Not sure if this is too late or not, I replied in the discussion thread
about some thinking.
Whether we tweak the sink connector or we allow a flexible and general
function creation.
On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 5:03 PM mattison chao <ma...@apache.org>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Mattison
>
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 01:56, Dave Fisher <wa...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On 2022/07/28 10:39:35 Christophe Bornet wrote:
> > > Hi, Pulsar community,
> > >
> > > I'd like to start a vote on PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
> > >
> > > You can find the proposal at
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16739 and
> > > the discussion thread at
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/qn59jwn47w9ngxpkvq3kswbl1y882jth.
> > >
> > > The vote will stay open for at least 48 hours.
> > >
> > > Best regards.
> > >
> > > Christophe Bornet
> > >
>
--
Best Regards,
Neng
Re: [VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
Posted by mattison chao <ma...@apache.org>.
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Mattison
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 01:56, Dave Fisher <wa...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 2022/07/28 10:39:35 Christophe Bornet wrote:
> > Hi, Pulsar community,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote on PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
> >
> > You can find the proposal at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16739 and
> > the discussion thread at
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/qn59jwn47w9ngxpkvq3kswbl1y882jth.
> >
> > The vote will stay open for at least 48 hours.
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
> > Christophe Bornet
> >
Re: [VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
Posted by Dave Fisher <wa...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
On 2022/07/28 10:39:35 Christophe Bornet wrote:
> Hi, Pulsar community,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
>
> You can find the proposal at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16739 and
> the discussion thread at
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/qn59jwn47w9ngxpkvq3kswbl1y882jth.
>
> The vote will stay open for at least 48 hours.
>
> Best regards.
>
> Christophe Bornet
>