You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> on 2003/07/01 15:05:22 UTC
Re: LimitInternalRecursion for 1.3
Noted in Apache 1.3's STATUS file... There is also
a question (MMN bump) and we need docs for it.
On Monday, June 30, 2003, at 05:37 PM, André Malo wrote:
> Call for votes ;-)
>
> There's a patch residing in the 2.0 STATUS file (for some reason),
> which
> manages infinite loops of internal redirects and subrequests. It's
> already
> acked for 2.0 includsion and it would be nice, if someone could review
> the
> 1.3 patch (<http://cvs.apache.org/~nd/recursion13.patch>) so it can be
> included in 1.3.28 (missing just one vote).
>
> Thanks, nd
>
Re: LimitInternalRecursion for 1.3
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com>.
On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at 04:16 PM, André Malo wrote:
> * Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Noted in Apache 1.3's STATUS file... There is also
>> a question (MMN bump)
>
> Hmm, in 2.x we decided that core_server_conf isn't public so we don't
> need
> such a bump. Perhaps for the ap_is_recursion_limit_exceeded function?
> Then
> we'd need to bump in 2.x, too.
>
> Opinions?
>
I also agree that we don't officially export it, so a bump
isn't 100% required, but it was something that needed
to be brought up.
Re: LimitInternalRecursion for 1.3
Posted by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>.
* Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Noted in Apache 1.3's STATUS file... There is also
> a question (MMN bump)
Hmm, in 2.x we decided that core_server_conf isn't public so we don't need
such a bump. Perhaps for the ap_is_recursion_limit_exceeded function? Then
we'd need to bump in 2.x, too.
Opinions?
> and we need docs for it.
Yep... I'm going to commit it soon.
nd