You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hivemind.apache.org by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> on 2005/02/23 22:57:52 UTC
Rename ServiceModel to ServiceLifecycleModel...
All,
While writing my article, I was having a difficult time describing "service
models" in HiveMind. To me, they're more logically described as "service
lifecycle models" or more succinctly "lifecycle models." Should we change
the documentation/code to reflect such a distinction? For these core
concept changes, it'd be better to make the changes earlier rather than
later. I think it would make the framework easier to understand. Any
thoughts?
James
Re: Rename ServiceModel to ServiceLifecycleModel...
Posted by Johan Lindquist <jo...@kawoo.co.uk>.
I'd say go for LifecycleModel ... Has a better ring to it ;)
Johan
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:58:49 -0500, James Carman
<ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> Do you like ServiceLifecycleModel or LifecycleModel?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Howard Lewis Ship [mailto:hlship@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 5:15 PM
> To: hivemind-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Rename ServiceModel to ServiceLifecycleModel...
>
> Go for it! My weakness is naming things, and this is hidden under the
> covers enough that changes are not a problem.
>
>
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:57:52 -0500, James Carman
> <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> All,
>>
>>
>>
>> While writing my article, I was having a difficult time describing
> "service
>> models" in HiveMind. To me, they're more logically described as
>> "service
>> lifecycle models" or more succinctly "lifecycle models." Should we
>> change
>> the documentation/code to reflect such a distinction? For these core
>> concept changes, it'd be better to make the changes earlier rather than
>> later. I think it would make the framework easier to understand. Any
>> thoughts?
>>
>>
>>
>> James
>
>
--
you too?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hivemind-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hivemind-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: Rename ServiceModel to ServiceLifecycleModel...
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
Do you like ServiceLifecycleModel or LifecycleModel?
-----Original Message-----
From: Howard Lewis Ship [mailto:hlship@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 5:15 PM
To: hivemind-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rename ServiceModel to ServiceLifecycleModel...
Go for it! My weakness is naming things, and this is hidden under the
covers enough that changes are not a problem.
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:57:52 -0500, James Carman
<ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> While writing my article, I was having a difficult time describing
"service
> models" in HiveMind. To me, they're more logically described as "service
> lifecycle models" or more succinctly "lifecycle models." Should we change
> the documentation/code to reflect such a distinction? For these core
> concept changes, it'd be better to make the changes earlier rather than
> later. I think it would make the framework easier to understand. Any
> thoughts?
>
>
>
> James
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work. http://howardlewisship.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hivemind-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hivemind-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hivemind-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hivemind-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Rename ServiceModel to ServiceLifecycleModel...
Posted by Howard Lewis Ship <hl...@gmail.com>.
Go for it! My weakness is naming things, and this is hidden under the
covers enough that changes are not a problem.
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:57:52 -0500, James Carman
<ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> While writing my article, I was having a difficult time describing "service
> models" in HiveMind. To me, they're more logically described as "service
> lifecycle models" or more succinctly "lifecycle models." Should we change
> the documentation/code to reflect such a distinction? For these core
> concept changes, it'd be better to make the changes earlier rather than
> later. I think it would make the framework easier to understand. Any
> thoughts?
>
>
>
> James
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work. http://howardlewisship.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hivemind-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hivemind-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org