You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2014/09/08 16:00:10 UTC
Re: [users@httpd] Rewritemap External Rewriting Program
On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:37 AM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>
> Using prg on a high-volume site is discouraged, as all requests will be fed through a single instance of the prg, creating a significant bottleneck. The dash2under.pl example is just that - an example - and there are better ways to accomplish what it does ... as there are, usually, better ways to accomplish things that prg can be used for.
Idea: we should consider keeping that prg open as a forked child, ala fcgi.
Seems like a reasonable improvement :)
>
> Consider mod_lua as an alternative way to do rewritemap-ish things
++1
Re: [users@httpd] Rewritemap External Rewriting Program
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> Idea: we should consider keeping that prg open as a forked child, ala fcgi.
> Seems like a reasonable improvement :)
It does that part already, but httpd uses a global lock to send
requests to stdin and read responses on stdout.
Re: [users@httpd] Rewritemap External Rewriting Program
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> Idea: we should consider keeping that prg open as a forked child, ala fcgi.
> Seems like a reasonable improvement :)
It does that part already, but httpd uses a global lock to send
requests to stdin and read responses on stdout.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org